Literature DB >> 28957517

Who Are the "Lazy" Ants? The Function of Inactivity in Social Insects and a Possible Role of Constraint: Inactive Ants Are Corpulent and May Be Young and/or Selfish.

Daniel Charbonneau1, Corey Poff2, Hoan Nguyen3, Min C Shin3, Karen Kierstead4, Anna Dornhaus4.   

Abstract

Social insect colonies are commonly thought of as highly organized and efficient complex systems, yet high levels of worker inactivity are common. Although consistently inactive workers have been documented across many species, very little is known about the potential function or costs associated with this behavior. Here we ask what distinguishes these "lazy" individuals from their nestmates. We obtained a large set of behavioral and morphological data about individuals, and tested for consistency with the following evolutionary hypotheses: that inactivity results from constraint caused by worker (a) immaturity or (b) senescence; that (c) inactive workers are reproducing; that inactive workers perform a cryptic task such as (d) acting as communication hubs or (e) food stores; and that (f) inactive workers represent the "slow-paced" end of inter-worker variation in "pace-of-life." We show that inactive workers walk more slowly, have small spatial fidelity zones near the nest center, are more corpulent, are isolated in colony interaction networks, have the smallest behavioral repertoires, and are more likely to have oocytes than other workers. These results are consistent with the hypotheses that inactive workers are immature and/or storing food for the colony; they suggest that workers are not inactive as a consequence of senescence, and that they are not acting as communication hubs. The hypotheses listed above are not mutually exclusive, and likely form a "syndrome" of behaviors common to inactive social insect workers. Their simultaneous contribution to inactivity may explain the difficulty in finding a simple answer to this deceptively simple question. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology 2017. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28957517     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icx029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  6 in total

1.  When being flexible matters: Ecological underpinnings for the evolution of collective flexibility and task allocation.

Authors:  Merlijn Staps; Corina E Tarnita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Costs of task allocation with local feedback: Effects of colony size and extra workers in social insects and other multi-agent systems.

Authors:  Tsvetomira Radeva; Anna Dornhaus; Nancy Lynch; Radhika Nagpal; Hsin-Hao Su
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Who needs 'lazy' workers? Inactive workers act as a 'reserve' labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed.

Authors:  Daniel Charbonneau; Takao Sasaki; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ant workers produce males in queenless parts of multi-nest colonies.

Authors:  Julia Giehr; Lisa Senninger; Katja Ruhland; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Parasite Presence Induces Gene Expression Changes in an Ant Host Related to Immunity and Longevity.

Authors:  Marah Stoldt; Linda Klein; Sara Beros; Falk Butter; Evelien Jongepier; Barbara Feldmeyer; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Colony specificity and starvation-driven changes in activity patterns of the red ant Myrmica rubra.

Authors:  Oscar Vaes; Claire Detrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.