Literature DB >> 28957023

Dopamine, Inference, and Uncertainty.

Samuel J Gershman1.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that the phasic dopamine response reports a reward prediction error has become deeply entrenched. However, dopamine neurons exhibit several notable deviations from this hypothesis. A coherent explanation for these deviations can be obtained by analyzing the dopamine response in terms of Bayesian reinforcement learning. The key idea is that prediction errors are modulated by probabilistic beliefs about the relationship between cues and outcomes, updated through Bayesian inference. This account can explain dopamine responses to inferred value in sensory preconditioning, the effects of cue preexposure (latent inhibition), and adaptive coding of prediction errors when rewards vary across orders of magnitude. We further postulate that orbitofrontal cortex transforms the stimulus representation through recurrent dynamics, such that a simple error-driven learning rule operating on the transformed representation can implement the Bayesian reinforcement learning update.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28957023     DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_01023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  15 in total

1.  Rethinking dopamine as generalized prediction error.

Authors:  Matthew P H Gardner; Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The Successor Representation: Its Computational Logic and Neural Substrates.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Believing in dopamine.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Naoshige Uchida
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Model-based predictions for dopamine.

Authors:  Angela J Langdon; Melissa J Sharpe; Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Yael Niv
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Quantity versus quality: Convergent findings in effort-based choice tasks.

Authors:  Evan E Hart; Alicia Izquierdo
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Dissecting EXIT.

Authors:  Samuel Paskewitz; Matt Jones
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 1.387

7.  Uncertainty-guided learning with scaled prediction errors in the basal ganglia.

Authors:  Moritz Möller; Sanjay Manohar; Rafal Bogacz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 8.  Adaptive learning under expected and unexpected uncertainty.

Authors:  Alireza Soltani; Alicia Izquierdo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  The effects of positive or negative self-talk on the alteration of brain functional connectivity by performing cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Junhyung Kim; Joon Hee Kwon; Joohan Kim; Eun Joo Kim; Hesun Erin Kim; Sunghyon Kyeong; Jae-Jin Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Variability in Action Selection Relates to Striatal Dopamine 2/3 Receptor Availability in Humans: A PET Neuroimaging Study Using Reinforcement Learning and Active Inference Models.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Michael Moutoussis; Matthew M Nour; Tarik Dahoun; Declan Lewis; Benjamin Illingworth; Mattia Veronese; Christoph Mathys; Lieke de Boer; Marc Guitart-Masip; Karl J Friston; Oliver D Howes; Jonathan P Roiser
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.