Literature DB >> 28956787

The current total economic burden of diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands.

M L Peters1, E L Huisman, M Schoonen, B H R Wolffenbuttel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Insight into the total economic burden of diabetes mellitus (DM) is essential for decision makers and payers. Currently available estimates for the Netherlands only include part of the total burden or are no longer up-to-date. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the current total economic burden of DM and its complications in the Netherlands, by including all the relevant cost components.
METHODS: The study combined a systematic literature review to identify all relevant published information and a targeted review to identify relevant information in the grey literature. The identified evidence was then combined to estimate the current total economic burden.
RESULTS: In 2016, there were an estimated 1.1 million DM patients in the Netherlands, of whom approximately 10% had type 1 and 90% had type 2 DM. The estimated current total economic burden of DM was € 6.8 billion in 2016. Healthcare costs (excluding costs of complications) were € 1.6 billion, direct costs of complications were € 1.3 billion and indirect costs due to productivity losses, welfare payments and complications were € 4.0 billion.
CONCLUSION: DM and its complications pose a substantial economic burden to the Netherlands, which is expected to rise due to changing demographics and lifestyle. Indirect costs, such as welfare payments, accounted for a large portion of the current total economic burden of DM, while these cost components are often not included in cost estimations. Publicly available data for key cost drivers such as complications were scarce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28956787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth J Med        ISSN: 0300-2977            Impact factor:   1.422


  14 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pumps Versus Multiple Daily Injections Plus Intermittently Scanned Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Erik H Serné; Stéphane Roze; Maria I Buompensiere; William J Valentine; Simona De Portu; Harold W de Valk
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  An Innovative Approach for Decision-Making on Designing Lifestyle Programs to Reduce Type 2 Diabetes on Dutch Population Level Using Dynamic Simulations.

Authors:  Teun Sluijs; Lotte Lokkers; Serdar Özsezen; Guido A Veldhuis; Heleen M Wortelboer
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Plasma phosphate and all-cause mortality in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes: the Dutch population-based lifelines cohort study.

Authors:  Amarens van der Vaart; Qingqing Cai; Ilja M Nolte; André P J van Beek; Gerjan Navis; Stephan J L Bakker; Peter R van Dijk; Martin H de Borst
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 8.949

4.  Metformin and statin use associate with plasma protein N-glycosylation in people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sunny S Singh; Annemieke Naber; Viktoria Dotz; Emma Schoep; Elham Memarian; Roderick C Slieker; Petra J M Elders; Gerda Vreeker; Simone Nicolardi; Manfred Wuhrer; Eric J G Sijbrands; Aloysius G Lieverse; Leen M 't Hart; Mandy van Hoek
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-07

5.  Factors of occurrence and improvement methods of presenteeism attributed to diabetes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Koji Mori; Takahiro Mori; Tomohisa Nagata; Masako Nagata; Mahoko Iwasaki; Hiroki Sakai; Koki Kimura; Natsumi Shinzato
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Once-weekly semaglutide for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Barnaby Hunt; Samuel J P Malkin; Robert G J Moes; Eline L Huisman; Tom Vandebrouck; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2019-10-01

7.  Clinical effectiveness of liraglutide vs basal insulin in a real-world setting: Evidence of improved glycaemic and weight control in obese people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jetty A Overbeek; Edith M Heintjes; Eline L Huisman; Christian K Tikkanen; Arnout W van Diermen; Fernie J A Penning-van Beest; Ron M C Herings
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 6.577

8.  Drug utilization in the Maastricht Study: A comparison with nationwide data.

Authors:  Johannes T H Nielen; Johanna H M Driessen; Pieter C Dagnelie; Annelies Boonen; Bart van den Bemt; Hein A W van Onzenoort; Cees Neef; Ronald M A Henry; Andrea M Burden; Simone J S Sep; Carla J van der Kallen; Miranda T Schram; Nicolaas Schaper; Coen D A Stehouwer; Luc Smits; Frank de Vries
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  A personalised screening strategy for diabetic retinopathy: a cost-effectiveness perspective.

Authors:  Sajad Emamipour; Amber A W A van der Heijden; Giel Nijpels; Petra Elders; Joline W J Beulens; Maarten J Postma; Job F M van Boven; Talitha L Feenstra
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Burden of disease of type 2 diabetes mellitus: cost of illness and quality of life estimated using the Maastricht Study.

Authors:  L M M Janssen; M Hiligsmann; A M J Elissen; M A Joore; N C Schaper; J H A Bosma; C D A Stehouwer; S J S Sep; A Koster; M T Schram; S M A A Evers
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.