Brenda J Svensson1,2, Elizabeth S Dylke1, Leigh C Ward1,3, Sharon L Kilbreath1. 1. 1 Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia . 2. 2 Occupational Therapy Department, Lourdes Hospital and Community Health Service , Dubbo, Australia . 3. 3 School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, Australia .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Detection of lymphedema, particularly its mild stage, is clinically challenging. The aim of this study was to determine whether segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) provided additional information to whole arm BIS in assessing women with or at risk of lymphedema following breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants (n = 66), aged 61.6 ± 10.5 years (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), were grouped according to lymphedema status: (1) at-risk (n = 24) had no indicators of lymphedema and (2) lymphedema (n = 42) were suspected to be developing lymphedema or had previously met lymphedema diagnostic criteria and undergone treatment. For each upper limb, impedance was measured for the whole arm, hand and four 10 cm segments of the arm, commencing at the ulnar styloid. Interlimb impedance ratios for corresponding locations were calculated and compared to previously determined, normatively based thresholds based on 2SD and 3SD above the mean. Segmental BIS classified 19% more women with lymphedema than 3SD whole arm thresholds and the same number as 2SD whole arm thresholds. Segmental BIS identified localized lymphedema and patterns in lymphedema distribution that were undetectable by whole arm BIS. Neither 3SD whole arm nor segmental BIS thresholds found lymphedema where it was not present; however, 2SD whole arm thresholds alone classified one woman in the at-risk group as having lymphedema. CONCLUSION: Segmental BIS classified as many or more cases of lymphedema than whole arm BIS thresholds without finding lymphedema where it was likely not present while also providing additional information regarding the distribution of lymphedema within the limb.
BACKGROUND: Detection of lymphedema, particularly its mild stage, is clinically challenging. The aim of this study was to determine whether segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) provided additional information to whole arm BIS in assessing women with or at risk of lymphedema following breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS:Participants (n = 66), aged 61.6 ± 10.5 years (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), were grouped according to lymphedema status: (1) at-risk (n = 24) had no indicators of lymphedema and (2) lymphedema (n = 42) were suspected to be developing lymphedema or had previously met lymphedema diagnostic criteria and undergone treatment. For each upper limb, impedance was measured for the whole arm, hand and four 10 cm segments of the arm, commencing at the ulnar styloid. Interlimb impedance ratios for corresponding locations were calculated and compared to previously determined, normatively based thresholds based on 2SD and 3SD above the mean. Segmental BIS classified 19% more women with lymphedema than 3SD whole arm thresholds and the same number as 2SD whole arm thresholds. Segmental BIS identified localized lymphedema and patterns in lymphedema distribution that were undetectable by whole arm BIS. Neither 3SD whole arm nor segmental BIS thresholds found lymphedema where it was not present; however, 2SD whole arm thresholds alone classified one woman in the at-risk group as having lymphedema. CONCLUSION: Segmental BIS classified as many or more cases of lymphedema than whole arm BIS thresholds without finding lymphedema where it was likely not present while also providing additional information regarding the distribution of lymphedema within the limb.
Authors: Fangdi Sun; Alexander Hall; Megan P Tighe; Cheryl L Brunelle; Hoda E Sayegh; Tessa C Gillespie; Kayla M Daniell; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 4.872