Literature DB >> 28956139

The effects of 'activating' almonds on consumer acceptance and gastrointestinal tolerance.

Heidi Taylor1, Kirsten Webster1, Andrew R Gray2, Siew Ling Tey1, Alex Chisholm1, Karl Bailey1, Shivani Kumari1, Rachel C Brown3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recommendations to soak nuts prior to consumption to reduce phytate concentrations and improve gastrointestinal tolerance have received much attention in the popular press. This is despite no supporting scientific evidence for the practice. There is also a lack of information about how soaking nuts might affect consumer acceptability. This study primarily assessed the effects of soaking almonds on consumer acceptance and secondly assessed effects on gastrointestinal tolerance.
METHODS: In this 8-week randomised crossover trial, 76 participants were allocated in balanced order to receive 30 g/day of four different preparations of almonds for 12 days: whole unsoaked, whole soaked, sliced unsoaked, and sliced soaked. Ratings of overall liking, desire to consume, and likelihood of future consumption, and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms were measured daily on visual analogue scales. The phytate concentrations were measured in all four nut types using high-performance liquid chromatography.
RESULTS: Mean acceptance ratings of all nut types were above the neutral point indicating they were acceptable. However, sliced soaked almonds were rated significantly lower overall for all three acceptance scales compared to the other treatments (all P ≤ 0.003). The sliced unsoaked almonds were rated lower than both whole nut treatments (all P ≤ 0.006), while there were no significant differences between the two whole nut treatments (all P ≥ 0.511). Gastrointestinal symptoms were minimal, but flatulence was rated significantly higher for all time points combined for soaked whole nuts compared to unsoaked whole nuts (P = 0.005). Compared to the whole unsoaked nuts (mean [SD] 531 [9] mg/100 g), phytate concentration was higher for the whole soaked almonds (563 [38] mg/100 g, P = 0.016), with no evidence of a difference for the sliced soaked almonds (548 [27] mg/100 g, P = 0.197) and no difference between the soaked forms (P = 0.262).
CONCLUSIONS: This research supports previous results suggesting nuts, including different forms, are an acceptable food. They are also well tolerated gastrointestinally, but soaking does not improve gastrointestinal tolerance or acceptance as claimed in the lay literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activating; Almonds; Consumer acceptance; Gastrointestinal tolerance; Nuts; Phytate; Soaking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28956139     DOI: 10.1007/s00394-017-1543-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nutr        ISSN: 1436-6207            Impact factor:   5.614


  28 in total

1.  Do dry roasting, lightly salting nuts affect their cardioprotective properties and acceptability?

Authors:  Siew Ling Tey; Terryn Robinson; Andrew R Gray; Alexandra W Chisholm; Rachel Clare Brown
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Bioavailability of iron, zinc, phytate and phytase activity during soaking and germination of white sorghum varieties.

Authors:  Abd El-Moneim M R Afify; Hossam S El-Beltagi; Samiha M Abd El-Salam; Azza A Omran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Nut-enriched bread is an effective and acceptable vehicle to improve regular nut consumption.

Authors:  Asika Devi; Alexandra Chisholm; Andrew Gray; Siew Ling Tey; Destynee Williamson-Poutama; Sonya L Cameron; Rachel C Brown
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Assessment of home-based processing methods to reduce the phytate content and phytate/zinc molar ratio of white maize (Zea mays).

Authors:  C Hotz; R S Gibson
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Out-of-hand nut consumption is associated with improved nutrient intake and health risk markers in US children and adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004.

Authors:  Carol E O'Neil; Debra R Keast; Theresa A Nicklas; Victor L Fulgoni
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Reduction of phytic acid and enhancement of bioavailable micronutrients in food grains.

Authors:  Raj Kishor Gupta; Shivraj Singh Gangoliya; Nand Kumar Singh
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  Nuts: source of energy and macronutrients.

Authors:  Gemma Brufau; Josep Boatella; Magda Rafecas
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  The dose of hazelnuts influences acceptance and diet quality but not inflammatory markers and body composition in overweight and obese individuals.

Authors:  Siew Ling Tey; Andrew R Gray; Alexandra W Chisholm; Conor M Delahunty; Rachel C Brown
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Nuts improve diet quality compared to other energy-dense snacks while maintaining body weight.

Authors:  Siew Ling Tey; Rachel Brown; Andrew Gray; Alexandra Chisholm; Conor Delahunty
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2011-08-10

10.  Tree nut consumption is associated with better nutrient adequacy and diet quality in adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2010.

Authors:  Carol E O'Neil; Theresa A Nicklas; Victor L Fulgoni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 5.717

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Can Nuts Mitigate Malnutrition in Older Adults? A Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Sze-Yen Tan; Siew Ling Tey; Rachel Brown
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 5.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.