| Literature DB >> 28955800 |
Stephen S Wanyonyi1,2, Amit Kumar2,3, Ryan Du Preez1, Christophe Lefevre2,3, Kevin R Nicholas2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The unique lactation strategy of the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugeni) has been invaluable in evaluating the role of lactogenic hormones and the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the local control of mammary gland function. However molecular pathways through which hormones and ECM exert their effect on wallaby mammary gland function remain unclear. This study undertakes transcriptome analysis of wallaby mammary epithelial cells (WallMEC) following treatment with mammary ECM from two distinct stages of lactation.Entities:
Keywords: Milk lipid composition
Year: 2017 PMID: 28955800 PMCID: PMC5613237 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.08.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Fig. 2: Acini morphology after culturing WallMEC on ECM extracted from MID and LATE ECM. A: Acini after culturing WallMEC on MID ECM for 13 days (before treatment with hormones). A represents mature acini. WM represents WallMEC cells in a monolayer. B: Acini cultured on MID ECM after 5 days of treatment with hormones. C: Acini after culturing WallMEC on LATE ECM for 13 days (before treatment with hormones). D: Acini cultured on LATE ECM after 5 days of treatment with hormones. Acini images were captured at 40x magnification in a bright field setting of the Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems).
Fig. 3Volcano plots comparing the fold change in gene expression of WallMEC cultured on MID and LATE ECM. A: MID ECM without hormones (NH) versus MID ECM in the presence of hormones (H). B: LATE ECM without hormones (NH) versus LATE ECM in the presence of hormones (H). C: MID ECM without hormones (NH) versus LATE ECM without hormones (NH). D: MID ECM in the presence of hormones (H) versus LATE ECM in the presence of hormones (H). The dots on the left side of zero represent down regulated genes while the dots on the right side represent up-regulated genes. Blue dots represent genes whose expression level is significantly different. The statistical significance of the difference between treatments expressed as –log10(p value) is shown on the y-axis. In order to enhance the level of confidence only genes with –log10(p value) higher than 2.5 were considered to be differentially expressed between the treatments.
Fig. 1Summary of the experimental protocol.
: Genes down-regulated by ECM grouped according to functional pathways.
| No pathway | – |
| Lysosome | cathepsins, ACP5, ASAH1, LAPTM |
| Complement and coagulation pathway | C1S, C2, C3, |
| Cell adhesion molecules | PVRL1, CNTN1, CDH3, |
: Genes up-regulated by ECM grouped according to functional pathways.
| Jak-STAT signaling pathway | IL6, CytokineR, PI3K, CycD |
| Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction | IL6, IL11, LIF, BSF3, CSF3, GHR, CSF2RB, SF11B, SF21, IL1R2, HGF, FLT, IL18 |
| Complement and coagulation cascades | F3, THBD, serpinE1 |
| Hematopoietic cell lineage | G-SCF, IL−6, IL−11,CD121 |
| TGF-beta signaling pathway | THBS1, BMP, FST, Smad1/5/8 |
| Cell cycle | Bub1, BubR1, cd20, cyclinB, Plk1, cyclinD, MCM5 |
| oocyte meiosis | IGF−1, Bub1, PI3K, cdc20, Plk1, CycB1, AC |
| Neurotrophin signaling pathway | TrkC, PI3K, IkB, PKCδ, RIMID, IRAK |
| Wnt signaling pathway | FRP, Wnt, Frizzled, Nkd, NFAT |
| Jak-STAT signaling pathway | IL6, CytokineR, PI3K, CyclinD |
| Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction | IL6, IL11, LIF, BSF3, CSF3, GHR, CSF2RB, SF11B, SF21, IL1R2 |
| Complement and coagulation cascades | F3, THBD, serpinE1, PLAU, DF |
| Hematopoietic cell lineage | G-SCF, IL−6, IL−11,CD121 |
| TGF-beta signaling pathway | Smad2,3, THBS1, BMP, FST, Smad1/5/8 |
| p53 signaling pathway | CyclinD, CyclinB, IGF, PAI, p53R2 |
| Cell cycle | Bub1, BubR1, Smad2,3, cd20, cyclinB, Plk1, cyclinD, |
| Oocyte meiosis | IGF−1, Bub1, PI3K, cdc20, Plk1, CycB1, AC |
| Neurotrophin signaling pathway | TrkC, PI3K, IkB |
| NOD-like receptor signaling pathway | RIMID, IkB, IL−6 |
| Wnt signaling pathway | FRP, Wnt, Frizzled, Nkd, Smad3, NFAT, fra1, CycD, uterine |
| Galactose metabolism | Glucose phosphomutase, Glucose−1-phosphate, Hexokinase, uridylyltransferase UDP-galactose 4-epimerase |
Fig. 4A: Galactose metabolism pathway. Genes that were up-regulated after culturing WallMEC on LATE ECM relative to MID ECM are marked in blue and underlined. An enrichment score of greater than 1.3 (calculated as the geometric mean of all the enrichment p-values (EASE scores), was used to determine differentially expressed genes in the pathway. The p-value (EASE score) was determined using a modified Fisher's exact test with a default cut-off of 0.1. 4B:Lysosome pathway: Genes that were down-regulated following treatment of WallMEC with LATE_H relative to MID_H are marked in blue and underlined. Criteria for determining differentially expressed genes in the pathway are explained in the legend for Fig. 3A. 4C:p53 signaling pathway: Genes that were up-regulated following treatment of WallMEC with LATE_H relative to MID_H are marked in blue ovals. Criteria for determining differentially expressed genes in the pathway are explained in the legend for Fig. 3A. 4D:Wnt signaling pathway. Genes that were up-regulated following treatment of WallMEC with LATE_H relative to MID_H are marked in blue. Criteria for determining differentially expressed genes in the pathway are explained in the legend for Fig. 3A.