This study examines major wildfires in the western United States between 2005 and 2015 to determine which species exhibit the highest percent change in mass concentration on day of peak fire influence relative to preceding nonfire days. Forty-one fires were examined using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) data set. Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) constituents exhibited the highest percent change increase. The sharpest enhancements were for the volatile (OC1) and semivolatile (OC2) OC fractions, suggestive of secondary organic aerosol formation during plume transport. Of the noncarbonaceous constituents, Cl, P, K, NO3-, and Zn levels exhibited the highest percent change. Dust was significantly enhanced in wildfire plumes, based on significant enhancements in fine soil components (i.e., Si, Ca, Al, Fe, and Ti) and PMcoarse (i.e., PM10-PM2.5). A case study emphasized how transport of wildfire plumes significantly impacted downwind states, with higher levels of fine soil and PMcoarse at the downwind state (Arizona) as compared to the source of the fires (California). A global model (Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System, NAAPS) did not capture the dust influence over California or Arizona during this case event because it is not designed to resolve dust dynamics in fires, which motivates improved treatment of such processes. Significant chloride depletion was observed on the peak EC day for almost a half of the fires examined. Size-resolved measurements during two specific fires at a coastal California site revealed significant chloride reductions for particle aerodynamic diameters between 1 and 10 μm.
This study examines major wildfires in the western United States between 2005 and 2015 to determine which spn class="Chemical">ecies exhibit the highest percent change in mn class="Chemical">ass concentration on day of peak fire influence relative to preceding nonfire days. Forty-one fires were examined using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) data set. Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) constituents exhibited the highest percent change increase. The sharpest enhancements were for the volatile (OC1) and semivolatile (OC2) OC fractions, suggestive of secondary organic aerosol formation during plume transport. Of the noncarbonaceous constituents, Cl, P, K, NO3-, and Zn levels exhibited the highest percent change. Dust wassignificantly enhanced in wildfire plumes, based on significant enhancements in fine soil components (i.e., Si, Ca, Al, Fe, and Ti) and PMcoarse (i.e., PM10-PM2.5). A case study emphasized how transport of wildfire plumes significantly impacted downwind states, with higher levels of fine soil and PMcoarse at the downwind state (Arizona) as compared to the source of the fires (California). A global model (Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System, NAAPS) did not capture the dust influence over California or Arizona during this case event because it is not designed to resolve dust dynamics in fires, which motivates improved treatment of such processes. Significant chloride depletion was observed on the peak EC day for almost a half of the fires examined. Size-resolved measurements during two specific fires at a coastal California site revealed significant chloride reductions for particle aerodynamic diameters between 1 and 10 μm.
Authors: M-C Chalbot; G Nikolich; V Etyemezian; D W Dubois; J King; D Shafer; G Gamboa da Costa; J F Hinton; I G Kavouras Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Andrzej Bytnerowicz; Yu-Mei Hsu; Kevin Percy; Allan Legge; Mark E Fenn; Susan Schilling; Witold Frączek; Diane Alexander Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Armin Sorooshian; Ewan Crosbie; Lindsay C Maudlin; Jong-Sang Youn; Zhen Wang; Taylor Shingler; Amber M Ortega; Scott Hersey; Roy K Woods Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 4.261
Authors: Ali Hossein Mardi; Hossein Dadashazar; Alexander B MacDonald; Ewan Crosbie; Matthew M Coggon; Mojtaba Azadi Aghdam; Roy K Woods; Haflidi H Jonsson; Richard C Flagan; John H Seinfeld; Armin Sorooshian Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 4.261
Authors: Alexander B MacDonald; Hossein Dadashazar; Patrick Y Chuang; Ewan Crosbie; Hailong Wang; Zhen Wang; Haflidi H Jonsson; Richard C Flagan; John H Seinfeld; Armin Sorooshian Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 4.261
Authors: Abdulmonam M Aldhaif; David H Lopez; Hossein Dadashazar; David Painemal; Andrew J Peters; Armin Sorooshian Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 4.261
Authors: Armin Sorooshian; Andrea F Corral; Rachel A Braun; Brian Cairns; Ewan Crosbie; Richard Ferrare; Johnathan Hair; Mary M Kleb; Ali Hossein Mardi; Hal Maring; Allison McComiskey; Richard Moore; David Painemal; Amy Jo Scarino; Joseph Schlosser; Taylor Shingler; Michael Shook; Hailong Wang; Xubin Zeng; Luke Ziemba; Paquita Zuidema Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 4.261
Authors: Gregory P Schill; Paul J DeMott; Ethan W Emerson; Anne Marie C Rauker; John K Kodros; Kaitlyn J Suski; Thomas C J Hill; Ezra J T Levin; Jeffrey R Pierce; Delphine K Farmer; Sonia M Kreidenweis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Leif G Jahn; Michael J Polen; Lydia G Jahl; Thomas A Brubaker; Joshua Somers; Ryan C Sullivan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alexander B MacDonald; Ali Hossein Mardi; Hossein Dadashazar; Mojtaba Azadi Aghdam; Ewan Crosbie; Haflidi H Jonsson; Richard C Flagan; John H Seinfeld; Armin Sorooshian Journal: Atmos Chem Phys Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 6.133
Authors: Ewan Crosbie; Matthew D Brown; Michael Shook; Luke Ziemba; Richard H Moore; Taylor Shingler; Edward Winstead; K Lee Thornhill; Claire Robinson; Alexander B MacDonald; Hossein Dadashazar; Armin Sorooshian; Andreas Beyersdorf; Alexis Eugene; Jeffrey Collett; Derek Straub; Bruce Anderson Journal: Atmos Meas Tech Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.176