| Literature DB >> 28955353 |
Jihye Jung1,2, Sang Chul Choi2, Sunghee Jung2,3, Byung-Kwan Cho1, Gwang-Hwan Ahn4, Stephen B Ryu2,3.
Abstract
Persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb.), which is a climacteric fruit, softens in 3-5 weeks after harvest. However, little is known regarding the transcriptional changes that underlie persimmon ripening. In this study, high-throughput de novo RNA sequencing was performed to examine differential expression between freshly harvested (FH) and softened (ST) persimmon fruit peels. Using the Illumina HiSeq platform, we obtained 259,483,704 high quality reads and 94,856 transcripts. After the removal of redundant sequences, a total of 31,258 unigenes were predicted, 1,790 of which were differentially expressed between FH and ST persimmon (1,284 up-regulated and 506 down-regulated in ST compared with FH). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were further subjected to KEGG pathway analysis. Several pathways were found to be up-regulated in ST persimmon, including "amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism." Pathways down-regulated in ST persimmon included "photosynthesis" and "carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms." Expression patterns of genes in these pathways were further confirmed using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Ethylene gas production during persimmon softening was monitored with gas chromatography and found to be correlated with the fruit softening. Transcription involved in ethylene biosynthesis, perception and signaling was up-regulated. On the whole, this study investigated the key genes involved in metabolic pathways of persimmon fruit softening, especially implicated in increased sugar metabolism, decreased photosynthetic capability, and increased ethylene production and other ethylene-related functions. This transcriptome analysis provides baseline information on the identity and modulation of genes involved in softening of persimmon fruits and can underpin the future development of technologies to delay softening in persimmon.Entities:
Keywords: Diospyros kaki; de novo RNA sequencing; ethylene; persimmon softening; transcriptional events
Year: 2017 PMID: 28955353 PMCID: PMC5601038 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Statistical summary of de novo assembly of D. kaki transcripts.
| Total transcripts | 94,856 | 145,748,163 | 200 | 10,510 | 1,536 | 2,190 |
| Unigenes | 31,258 | 30,524,524 | 200 | 10,510 | 976 | 1,695 |
Annotation summary of the assembled transcripts.
| Total unigenes | 31,258 (100.00%) |
| Nr (viridiplantae) | 16,806 (53.76%) |
| Phytozome | 18,424 (58.94%) |
| KOG | 16,574 (53.02%) |
| KEGG | 2,115 (6.76%) |
| Total annotation | 18,446 (59.01%) |
Figure 1KOG functional classification of D. kaki. The unigenes of persimmon fruit peels were aligned to the KOG database to predict and classify possible functions. A total of 16,574 unigenes were assigned to functional orthologs.
Figure 2KEGG pathway mapping for D. kaki. The unigenes of persimmon fruit peels were functionally classified according to metabolic function.
Figure 3Differential gene expression between freshly harvested (FH) and softened (ST) persimmon. (A) MA plot of DEGs between FH and ST. Genes up- and down-regulated in ST are shown in red and green, respectively. (B) Numbers of up- and down-regulated genes in ST compared with FH persimmon.
Figure 4Persimmon softening and production of ethylene gas. Persimmon softening is shown in terms of unsoftened persimmon (%) with a black dotted line. Ethylene abundance is indicated with a solid black line. Arrows indicate sampling points for qRT-PCR. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD).
Figure 5Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of representative DEGs of KEGG pathways modulated during persimmon fruit softening. (A) “Sugar metabolism,” (B) “Photosynthesis,” and (C) “Carbon fixation.” Transcription is shown relative to day 1 (expression level = 1) with the DkActin gene as an internal reference. Each qRT-PCR analysis was repeated three times. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD).
Summary of DEGs annotated using KEGG.
| 1,501 | 5,132 | 3.42 | UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase family protein | 0 | 94.59 | ||
| 150 | 525 | 3.51 | Chitinase A | 1.00E-144 | 78.57 | ||
| 190 | 2,261 | 11.88 | Basic chitinase | 1.00E-153 | 73.42 | ||
| 2,221 | 254 | 0.11 | Photosystem II subunit P-1 | 2.00E-120 | 77.82 | ||
| 2,416 | 433 | 0.18 | Chlorophyll A-B-binding family protein | 1.00E-108 | 76.51 | ||
| 2,951 | 428 | 0.15 | Ferredoxin-NADP(+)-oxido-reductase 1 | 0 | 89.86 | ||
| 3,629 | 917 | 0.25 | Photosystem I subunit D-1 | 8.00E-126 | 85.12 | ||
| 483 | 52 | 0.11 | Photosystem I subunit G | 3.00E-79 | 78.57 | ||
| 3,128 | 752 | 0.24 | Photosystem II BY | 2.00E-43 | 79.05 | ||
| 2,835 | 129 | 0.05 | Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chain 1A | 3.00E-53 | 77.14 | ||
| 1,848 | 254 | 0.14 | Phosphoribulokinase | 0 | 91.87 | ||
| 1,201 | 86 | 0.07 | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 2 | 0 | 93.23 | ||
| 1,219 | 157 | 0.13 | Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydro-genase A subunit 2 | 0.00E+00 | 90.17 | ||
| 791 | 68 | 0.09 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase B subunit | 0.00E+00 | 90.87 | ||
Average of three replicates.
Transcripts encoding predicted ethylene-related genes.
| 37 | 293 | 7.85 | ethylene response factor 1-like protein ERF1–2 | 2.00E-84 | 57.98 | ||
| 463 | 3,106 | 6.71 | EIN3-binding F-box protein 1-like | 0 | 70.72 | ||
| 503 | 3,691 | 7.34 | Ethylene receptor | 0 | 99.34 | ||
| 572 | 4,070 | 7.11 | Ethylene receptor | 0 | 99.84 | ||
| 119 | 529 | 4.46 | Ethylene response factor 14 | 1.00E-52 | 65.52 | ||
| 1576 | 7,826 | 4.97 | Ethylene receptor 2 | 0 | 73.9 | ||
Average of three replicates.
Previously identified genes.
Figure 6Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of DEGs involved in ethylene-perception and signaling during persimmon fruit softening. Transcription is shown relative to day 1 (expression level = 1) with the DkActin gene as an internal reference. Each qRT-PCR analysis was repeated three times. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD).
Figure 7Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of ethylene-biosynthesizing genes during persimmon fruit softening. Transcription is shown relative to day 1 (expression level = 1) with the DkActin gene as an internal reference. Each qRT-PCR analysis was repeated three times. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD).