Literature DB >> 28954826

Randomised controlled trial of two advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

Madoka Sunamura1, Nienke Ter Hoeve1,2, Rita J G van den Berg-Emons2, Marcel L Geleijnse3, Mirjam Haverkamp4, Henk J Stam2, Eric Boersma3, Ron T van Domburg3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The OPTICARE (OPTImal CArdiac REhabilitation) randomised controlled trial compared two advanced and extended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes to standard CR for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These programmes were designed to stimulate permanent adoption of a heart-healthy lifestyle. The primary outcome was the SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk function at 18 months follow-up.
METHODS: In total, 914 patients with ACS (age, 57 years; 81% men) were randomised to: (1) 3 months standard CR (CR-only); (2) standard CR including three additional face-to-face active lifestyle counselling sessions and extended with three group fitness training and general lifestyle counselling sessions in the first 9 months after standard CR (CR+F); or (3) standard CR extended for 9 months with five to six telephone general lifestyle counselling sessions (CR+T).
RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, we found no difference in the SCORE risk function at 18 months between CR+F and CR-only (3.30% vs 3.47%; p=0.48), or CR+T and CR-only (3.02% vs 3.47%; p=0.39). In a per-protocol analysis, two of three modifiable SCORE parameters favoured CR+F over CR-only: current smoking (13.4% vs 21.3%; p<0.001) and total cholesterol (3.9 vs 4.3 mmol/L; p<0.001). The smoking rate was also lower in CR+T compared with the CR-only (12.9% vs 21.3%; p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Extending CR with extra behavioural counselling (group sessions or individual telephone sessions) does not confer additional benefits with respect to SCORE parameters. Patients largely reach target levels for modifiable risk factors with few hospital readmissions already following standard CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01395095; results. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac rehabilitation; lifestyle modification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28954826     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  4 in total

1.  A secondary analysis of data from the OPTICARE randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of extended cardiac rehabilitation on functional capacity, fatigue, and participation in society.

Authors:  Nienke Ter Hoeve; Madoka Sunamura; Henk J Stam; Ron T van Domburg; Rita Jg van den Berg-Emons
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 2.  Relationships between Psychoeducational Rehabilitation and Health Outcomes-A Systematic Review Focused on Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Sabina Alexandra Cojocariu; Alexandra Maștaleru; Radu Andy Sascău; Cristian Stătescu; Florin Mitu; Elena Cojocaru; Laura Mihaela Trandafir; Maria-Magdalena Leon-Constantin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-21

3.  Interventions to promote patient utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Carolina Santiago de Araújo Pio; Gabriela Ss Chaves; Philippa Davies; Rod S Taylor; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-01

4.  Optimizing Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nienke Ter Hoeve
Journal:  J Rehabil Med Clin Commun       Date:  2019-01-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.