Literature DB >> 28954802

Henry Ford HEART Score Randomized Trial: Rapid Discharge of Patients Evaluated for Possible Myocardial Infarction.

Tiberio M Frisoli1, Richard Nowak2, Kaleigh L Evans2, Michael Harrison2, Maath Alani2, Saira Varghese2, Mehnaz Rahman2, Samantha Noll2, Katherine R Flannery2, Alex Michaels2, Mishel Tabaku2, Gordon Jacobsen2, James McCord2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital evaluation of patients with chest pain is common and costly. The HEART score risk stratification tool that merges troponin testing into a clinical risk model for evaluation emergency department patients with possible acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to effectively identify a substantial low-risk subset of patients possibly safe for early discharge without stress testing, a strategy that could have tremendous healthcare savings implications. METHOD AND
RESULTS: A total of 105 patients evaluated for AMI in the emergency departments of 2 teaching hospitals in the Henry Ford Health System (Detroit and West Bloomfield, MI), between February 2014 and May 2015, with a modified HEART score ≤3 (which includes cardiac troponin I <0.04 ng/mL at 0 and 3 hours) were randomized to immediate discharge (n=53) versus management in an observation unit with stress testing (n=52). The primary end points were 30-day total charges and length of stay. Secondary end points were all-cause death, nonfatal AMI, rehospitalization for evaluation of possible AMI, and coronary revascularization at 30 days. Patients randomized to early discharge, compared with those who were admitted for observation and cardiac testing, spent less time in the hospital (median 6.3 hours versus 25.9 hours; P<0.001) with an associated reduction in median total charges of care ($2953 versus $9616; P<0.001). There were no deaths, AMIs, or coronary revascularizations in either group. One patient in each group was lost to follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients evaluated for possible AMI in the emergency department with a modified HEART score ≤3, early discharge without stress testing as compared with transfer to an observation unit for stress testing was associated with significant reductions in length of stay and total charges, a finding that has tremendous potential national healthcare expenditure implications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03058120.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; chest pain; length of stay; myocardial infarction; troponin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28954802     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  7 in total

Review 1.  The HEART score: A guide to its application in the emergency department.

Authors:  William Brady; Katya de Souza
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-06-14

2.  Combined Use of High-Sensitive Cardiac Troponin, Copeptin, and the Modified HEART Score for Rapid Evaluation of Chest Pain Patients.

Authors:  Beata Morawiec; Brygida Przywara-Chowaniec; Piotr Muzyk; Mariusz Opara; Lam Ho; Lui Chun Tat; Olivier Muller; Ewa Nowalany-Kozielska; Damian Kawecki
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  The HEART score in predicting major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Byrne; Cristian Toarta; Barbra Backus; Tim Holt
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-02

4.  Potential impact of cardiology phone-consultation for patients risk-stratified by the HEART pathway.

Authors:  Ken Monahan; Margaret Pan; Chinonso Opara; Maame Yaa A B Yiadom; Daniel Munoz; Benjamin B Holmes; Davis Stephen; Kristopher J Swiger; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-12

5.  Efficacy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Nuclear Perfusion Stress in Preventing Downstream Imaging and Prolonged Inpatient Length of Stay in Low to Medium Risk Patients With Chest Pain.

Authors:  Mileydis Alonso; Radhika K Neicheril; Shruti Shettigar; Allen Lavina; Yelenis Seijo de Armas; Avery Carter; Hong Liang; Ashley Alonso; Jared S Piotrkowski
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-27

6.  Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Paul I Musey; Fernanda Bellolio; Suneel Upadhye; Anna Marie Chang; Deborah B Diercks; Michael Gottlieb; Erik P Hess; Michael C Kontos; Bryn E Mumma; Marc A Probst; John H Stahl; Jason P Stopyra; Jeffrey A Kline; Christopher R Carpenter
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 7.  Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Nicklaus P Ashburn; James C O'Neill; Jason P Stopyra; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.