Julie Adam1, Reshma Ramracheya2, Margarita V Chibalina2, Nicola Ternette3, Alexander Hamilton2, Andrei I Tarasov2, Quan Zhang2, Eduardo Rebelato4, Nils J G Rorsman2, Rafael Martín-Del-Río5, Amy Lewis6, Gizem Özkan7, Hyun Woong Do2, Peter Spégel8, Kaori Saitoh9, Keiko Kato9, Kaori Igarashi9, Benedikt M Kessler10, Christopher W Pugh11, Jorge Tamarit-Rodriguez12, Hindrik Mulder13, Anne Clark2, Norma Frizzell14, Tomoyoshi Soga9, Frances M Ashcroft15, Andrew Silver6, Patrick J Pollard16, Patrik Rorsman17. 1. Radcliffe Department of Medicine, OCDEM, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Henry Wellcome Building for Molecular Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, NDMRB, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FZ, UK. Electronic address: julie.adam@ndm.ox.ac.uk. 2. Radcliffe Department of Medicine, OCDEM, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK. 3. The Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FZ, UK. 4. Radcliffe Department of Medicine, OCDEM, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; Department of Biophysics, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 04023-062, Brazil. 5. Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain. 6. Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK. 7. Nuffield Department of Medicine, Henry Wellcome Building for Molecular Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK. 8. Centre for Analysis and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. 9. Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, 246-2 Mizukami, Tsuruoka, Yamagata 997-0052, Japan. 10. Target Discovery Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FZ, UK. 11. Nuffield Department of Medicine, Henry Wellcome Building for Molecular Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, NDMRB, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FZ, UK. 12. Biochemistry Department, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain. 13. Lund University Diabetes Centre, Unit of Molecular Metabolism, Clinical Research Centre, Malmo University Hospital, 20502 Malmo, Sweden. 14. Department of Pharmacology, Physiology & Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. 15. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. 16. Nuffield Department of Medicine, Henry Wellcome Building for Molecular Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK; Department of Physiology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Göteborg, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden. 17. Radcliffe Department of Medicine, OCDEM, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; Department of Physiology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Göteborg, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden. Electronic address: patrik.rorsman@hmc.ox.ac.uk.
Abstract
We explored the role of the Krebs cycle enzyme fumarate hydratase (FH) in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Mice lacking Fh1 in pancreatic β cells (Fh1βKO mice) appear normal for 6-8 weeks but then develop progressive glucose intolerance and diabetes. Glucose tolerance is rescued by expression of mitochondrial or cytosolic FH but not by deletion of Hif1α or Nrf2. Progressive hyperglycemia in Fh1βKO mice led to dysregulated metabolism in β cells, a decrease in glucose-induced ATP production, electrical activity, cytoplasmic [Ca2+]i elevation, and GSIS. Fh1 loss resulted in elevated intracellular fumarate, promoting succination of critical cysteines in GAPDH, GMPR, and PARK 7/DJ-1 and cytoplasmic acidification. Intracellular fumarate levels were increased in islets exposed to high glucose and in islets from human donors with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The impaired GSIS in islets from diabetic Fh1βKO mice was ameliorated after culture under normoglycemic conditions. These studies highlight the role of FH and dysregulated mitochondrial metabolism in T2D.
We explored the role of the Krebs cycle enzyme fumarate hydratase (FH) in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Mice lacking Fh1 in pancreatic β cells (Fh1βKO mice) appear normal for 6-8 weeks but then develop progressive glucose intolerance and diabetes. Glucose tolerance is rescued by expression of mitochondrial or cytosolic FH but not by deletion of Hif1α or Nrf2. Progressive hyperglycemia in Fh1βKO mice led to dysregulated metabolism in β cells, a decrease in glucose-induced ATP production, electrical activity, cytoplasmic [Ca2+]i elevation, and GSIS. Fh1 loss resulted in elevated intracellular fumarate, promoting succination of critical cysteines in GAPDH, GMPR, and PARK 7/DJ-1 and cytoplasmic acidification. Intracellular fumarate levels were increased in islets exposed to high glucose and in islets from human donors with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The impaired GSIS in islets from diabetic Fh1βKO mice was ameliorated after culture under normoglycemic conditions. These studies highlight the role of FH and dysregulated mitochondrial metabolism in T2D.
Diabetes is an increasing and serious global health and financial problem (Ashcroft and Rorsman, 2012), characterized by defective insulin secretion from the β cells of the pancreatic islets, which causes elevated blood glucose. Mitochondrial production of ATP plays a key role in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) (Maechler and Wollheim, 1999); an increase in intracellular ATP closes ATP-sensitive K+ channels (KATP channels) in the β cell plasma membrane, triggering depolarization and Ca2+-dependent electrical activity. The resulting rise in cytoplasmic Ca2+ initiates exocytosis of insulin granules. In addition to this “triggering” effect, glucose amplifies insulin secretion at a stage subsequent to Ca2+ influx. Several intracellular factors might mediate this amplifying effect, including ATP, NADPH, and glutamate (Henquin, 2011).The Krebs-cycle enzyme fumarate hydratase (FH) catalyzes the hydration of fumarate to malate. FH is also a tumor suppressor, mutated in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) (Launonen et al., 2001). Loss of FH activity results in the intracellular accumulation of fumarate, the stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α), and activation of HIF-dependent pathways, including glucose metabolism (Adam et al., 2014).The high levels of fumarate that accumulate in FH-deficient cells cause post-translational modification of cysteine residues in proteins to form S-(2-succino)-cysteine (2SC), a process known as succination (Alderson et al., 2006). This induces loss of activity of the mitochondrial Krebs-cycle enzyme aconitase (Ternette et al., 2013), activation of the antioxidant response sensor nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2) (Adam et al., 2011), and elevation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling (Sullivan et al., 2013, Zheng et al., 2015). Succination has been described in fat and skeletal muscle cells of some diabetic animal models (Nagai et al., 2007, Thomas et al., 2012). Its functional consequences include inactivation of the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Merkley et al., 2014, Blatnik et al., 2008).HIF1α is a known regulator of GSIS (Girgis et al., 2012, Spégel et al., 2011). Deletion of von Hippel-Lindau protein (Vhl), an integral component of the HIF1α degradation pathway, in β cells leads to HIF1α stabilization, a switch from oxidative to glycolytic metabolism and consequent glucose intolerance (Zehetner et al., 2008, Cantley et al., 2009). The high levels of fumarate that result from FH loss competitively inhibit the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases that catalyze HIF prolyl hydroxylation. This allows HIF to escape degradation and results in the activation of HIF target genes (Isaacs et al., 2005, O’Flaherty et al., 2010), raising the possibility that FH loss might impair insulin secretion via HIF1α stabilization.We explored the role of FH in insulin secretion using a mouse model in which Fh1 was deleted specifically in pancreatic β cells (Fh1βKO mice). These mice had normal glucose tolerance for the first 6–8 weeks of life, and their β cells had essentially normal properties, including GSIS, despite the lack of a key Krebs-cycle enzyme. However, Fh1βKO mice subsequently developed rapidly progressing diabetes, culminating in severe glucose intolerance, reduced islet insulin content, and almost complete loss of GSIS.
We generated animals in which Fh1 was deleted specifically in pancreatic β cells (Fh1fl/flRip2-Cre+/−; Fh1βKO mice) by intercrossing an Fh1 conditional knockout mouse (Pollard et al., 2007) with mice expressing Cre recombinase driven by the rat insulin promoter (Rip2-Cre mice; Herrera, 2000). Control (CTL) mice were either Fh1Rip2-Cre−/− or Fh1Rip2-Cre+/− littermates. Deletion of Fh1 in β cells was confirmed at the protein level in islets of 9- to 12-week-old mice (Figure 1). No marked differences were seen in gross histology between CTL and Fh1βKO mice in islets (Figures 1A and 1F). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed that all cells in CTL islets exhibited uniform expression of FH, which was lost within the core of Fh1βKO islets. However, some islet cells, most likely α and β cells, retained FH (Figures 1B, 1G, and 1J). Fh1 loss and elevated fumarate lead to stabilization of HIF1α and subsequent nuclear localization (Isaacs et al., 2005, Pollard et al., 2005). Figures 1C and 1H show nuclear localization of HIF1α in most cells of Fh1βKO islets, but not in CTL islets or the exocrine pancreas. No marked differences were observed in insulin or glucagon IHC between CTL and Fh1βKO islets (Figures 1D, 1E, 1I, and 1J).
Figure 1
Fh1 Loss in Pancreatic β Cells Results in Progressive Hif1α-Independent Glucose Intolerance
(A–J) Histological analysis of pancreatic islets from stage II CTL (A–E) and Fh1βKO (F–J) mice (n = at least 10 islets from each of 10 mice per genotype). (A and F) H&E staining of CTL and Fh1βKO, respectively. (B–E and G–J) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for FH (B and G), HIF1α (C and H), insulin (D and I), and glucagon (E and J) in CTL (B–E) and Fh1βKO (G–J). Scale bar, 50 μm (all panels).
(K) mRNA levels of Fh1, Pdk1, and Egln3 relative to Actb (β-actin) in stage II CTL (black) and Fh1βKO islets (gray). (n = 30–50 islets in 5 experiments from a total of 10 animals of each genotype). §§§p < 0.0001.
(L) Free-fed blood glucose measured in different aged CTL (blue) and Fh1βKO mice (red). Stages I, II, and III are identified (n > 200 Fh1βKO mice, and n > 50 CTL mice). §p < 0.0001.
(M and N) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) performed in (M) stage II CTL (blue; n = 15) and Fh1βKO (red; n = 10) mice and (N) stage III mice (n = 7 per group). §p < 0.05.
(O) IHC for HIF1α in pancreas of stage III Fh1βKO (top) and Fh1HifαβKO (bottom) mice (n = at least 10 islets from each of 4 mice per genotype). Scale bar, 50 μm.
(P) IPGTT performed in stage III CTL, Fh1βKO, Hif1αKO, and Fh1Hif1αβKO mice. #p < 0.05, comparing Fh1βKO or Fh1Hif1αβKO versus CTL or Hif1αKO; Fh1βKO versus Fh1Hif1αβKO and CTL versus Hif1αKO are not significant (n = at least 5 mice per genotype).
(Q) Reintroduction of FH or FHcyt rescued the glucose intolerance of Fh1βKO mice. IPGTT performed on stage III CTL, Fh1βKO, CTL+FH, CTL+FHcyt, Fh1βKO+FH, and Fh1βKO+FHcyt mice. #p < 0.0001, Fh1βKO versus all other groups (n = 6–8 mice per genotype).
Arrows in (H) and (O) point to nuclei. Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figure S1.
Fh1 Loss in Pancreatic β Cells Results in Progressive Hif1α-Independent Glucose Intolerance(A–J) Histological analysis of pancreatic islets from stage II CTL (A–E) and Fh1βKO (F–J) mice (n = at least 10 islets from each of 10 mice per genotype). (A and F) H&E staining of CTL and Fh1βKO, respectively. (B–E and G–J) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for FH (B and G), HIF1α (C and H), insulin (D and I), and glucagon (E and J) in CTL (B–E) and Fh1βKO (G–J). Scale bar, 50 μm (all panels).(K) mRNA levels of Fh1, Pdk1, and Egln3 relative to Actb (β-actin) in stage II CTL (black) and Fh1βKO islets (gray). (n = 30–50 islets in 5 experiments from a total of 10 animals of each genotype). §§§p < 0.0001.(L) Free-fed blood glucose measured in different aged CTL (blue) and Fh1βKO mice (red). Stages I, II, and III are identified (n > 200 Fh1βKO mice, and n > 50 CTL mice). §p < 0.0001.(M and N) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) performed in (M) stage II CTL (blue; n = 15) and Fh1βKO (red; n = 10) mice and (N) stage III mice (n = 7 per group). §p < 0.05.(O) IHC for HIF1α in pancreas of stage III Fh1βKO (top) and Fh1HifαβKO (bottom) mice (n = at least 10 islets from each of 4 mice per genotype). Scale bar, 50 μm.(P) IPGTT performed in stage III CTL, Fh1βKO, Hif1αKO, and Fh1Hif1αβKO mice. #p < 0.05, comparing Fh1βKO or Fh1Hif1αβKO versus CTL or Hif1αKO; Fh1βKO versus Fh1Hif1αβKO and CTL versus Hif1αKO are not significant (n = at least 5 mice per genotype).(Q) Reintroduction of FH or FHcyt rescued the glucose intolerance of Fh1βKO mice. IPGTT performed on stage III CTL, Fh1βKO, CTL+FH, CTL+FHcyt, Fh1βKO+FH, and Fh1βKO+FHcyt mice. #p < 0.0001, Fh1βKO versus all other groups (n = 6–8 mice per genotype).Arrows in (H) and (O) point to nuclei. Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figure S1.Deletion of Fh1 was confirmed in Fh1βKO islets from 9- to 12-week-old mice at the mRNA level. A small amount of Fh1 mRNA remained in Fh1βKO islets, likely reflecting its presence in non-β cells (Figure 1K). Expression of the Hif1α target genes pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (Pdk1) and prolyl hydroxylase dehydrogenase 3 (Phd3/Egln3) was increased in Fh1βKO islets (Figure 1K).Blood glucose levels were measured in free-fed CTL and Fh1βKO littermates from 6 to 20 weeks. While young (6–8 weeks of age) Fh1βKO mice were nearly normoglycemic, they subsequently (at >9 weeks of age) developed severe hyperglycemia (>20 mM) (Figure 1L). Plasma glucose in CTL mice was stable at all ages (<10 mM). For simplicity, here we refer to CTL and Fh1βKO littermates at 6–8, 9–12, and >15 weeks of age as stages I–III, respectively, to match the progressive diabetes in Fh1βKO mice. Stages I (non-diabetic [ND]), II (diabetic), and III (severely diabetic) have free-fed blood glucose levels of 12.8 mM ± 0.6 mM, 22.6 mM ± 1.2 mM, and 30.4 mM ± 0.9 mM (Figure 1L). The progression of diabetes was confirmed in glucose tolerance tests, which revealed mild intolerance between 9 and 12 weeks of age (stage II) and severe intolerance by 15 weeks (stage III) (Figures 1M and 1N). No age-dependent deterioration of glucose tolerance was observed in CTL mice.To assess whether the glucose intolerance of Fh1βKO mice is mediated by HIF1α stabilization, we crossed Fh1βKO and Hif1α mice (Cramer et al., 2003) to produce β cell-specific deletion of both Fh1 and Hif1α (Fh1Hif1αβKO mice). Deletion of Hif1α, confirmed by loss of HIF1α staining in all nuclei of Fh1Hif1αβKO islets (Figure 1O), did not ameliorate the glucose intolerance of Fh1βKO mice (Figure 1P). Loss of Fh1 also leads to stabilization of NRF2 and activation of downstream pathways, typified by increased expression of Hmox1 (confirmed in Figure S1D) (Adam et al., 2011). The role of Nrf2 in β cell function is unclear, proposed to protect from oxidative damage and blunt GSIS (Uruno et al., 2013). To determine the contribution of Nrf2 to glucose homeostasis, we crossed Fh1βKO with a constitutive knockout of Nrf2 (Itoh et al., 1997) to delete both Fh1 and Nrf2 in the β cell (Fh1βNrf2DKO). The glucose intolerance of Fh1βKO mice was unaltered in the Fh1βNrf2DKO mice (Figure S1A). In contrast, crossing Fh1βKO mice with mice stably expressing either full-length human FH (Fh1βKO+FH) or cytoplasmic FH (FHcyt) (Fh1βKO+FHcyt) (Adam et al., 2013) fully reversed the glucose intolerance tested in stage III mice and restored the mRNA expression of Egln3 and Hmox1 (Figures 1Q and S1B–S1D), and these mice were normoglycemic for >1 year.
Deletion of Fh1 in β Cells Results in Progressive Loss of GSIS
To explore the cause of glucose intolerance in Fh1βKO mice, we examined insulin secretion from the perfused pancreas. Glucose elevation from 1 mM to 6 mM transiently stimulated insulin release ∼10-fold in stage II CTL mice but not in Fh1βKO littermates (Figure 2A). Nevertheless, the response to 20 mM glucose was almost superimposable in both genotypes. In stage III Fh1βKO mice, the response to both 6 mM and 20 mM glucose was 85% less than in CTL (Figure 2B). Similar effects on GSIS were obtained in static incubations (Figure S2). The mitochondrial substrate α-ketoisocaproic acid (α-KIC) stimulated insulin secretion ∼5-fold in CTL islets but had no effect in Fh1βKO islets (Figure S2).
Figure 2
Deletion of Fh1 in β Cells Impairs Insulin Secretion
(A and B) Insulin secretion from the perfused pancreata of stage II (A) and stage III (B) Fh1βKO mice (red) and CTL mice (black) (n = 3 mice for each genotype and age) in response to 1, 6, and 20 mM glucose. Statistical significances are omitted for clarity.
(C) Insulin content of islets from stage II CTL mice (black; n = 10 experiments; n = 10 mice) and Fh1βKO mice (gray; n = 14 experiments; n = 22 mice). §§§p < 0.0001.
(D) Electron micrographs of β cells from CTL and Fh1βKO mice. Abbreviations: g, insulin secretory granules; m, mitochondrion; n, nucleus. Scale bars, 500 nm.
(E) Insulin granule density measured in electron micrographs of β cells from stage II Fh1βKO (gray) and CTL (black) mice (25–30 β cells in 3–5 islets per genotype), §§§p < 0.001.
(F) Pancreatic insulin content of stage III CTL (black, n = 5) and Fh1βKO (gray, n = 10) mice. §§§§p < 0.0001.
(G) Representative examples of insulin IHC in stage III Fh1βKO and CTL islets (n > 100 islets from n > 10 mice of each genotype). Scale bar, 50 μm.
Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figure S2.
Deletion of Fh1 in β Cells Impairs Insulin Secretion(A and B) Insulin secretion from the perfused pancreata of stage II (A) and stage III (B) Fh1βKO mice (red) and CTL mice (black) (n = 3 mice for each genotype and age) in response to 1, 6, and 20 mM glucose. Statistical significances are omitted for clarity.(C) Insulin content of islets from stage II CTL mice (black; n = 10 experiments; n = 10 mice) and Fh1βKO mice (gray; n = 14 experiments; n = 22 mice). §§§p < 0.0001.(D) Electron micrographs of β cells from CTL and Fh1βKO mice. Abbreviations: g, insulin secretory granules; m, mitochondrion; n, nucleus. Scale bars, 500 nm.(E) Insulin granule density measured in electron micrographs of β cells from stage II Fh1βKO (gray) and CTL (black) mice (25–30 β cells in 3–5 islets per genotype), §§§p < 0.001.(F) Pancreatic insulin content of stage III CTL (black, n = 5) and Fh1βKO (gray, n = 10) mice. §§§§p < 0.0001.(G) Representative examples of insulin IHC in stage III Fh1βKO and CTL islets (n > 100 islets from n > 10 mice of each genotype). Scale bar, 50 μm.Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figure S2.These differences in insulin release correlated with a reduction in insulin content. In islets from stage II mice, insulin content and insulin granule density were reduced by ∼50% in Fh1βKO islets (Figures 2C–2E). Pancreatic insulin content was 97% less in stage III Fh1βKO mice, compared to CTL littermates (Figure 2F), and there was a marked decrease in insulin-positive cells (Figure 2G). When insulin secretion data are normalized to basal values, secretion from stage II Fh1βKO islets remains strongly reduced, suggesting that there is a functional defect (Figure S2).
Fh1βKO Islets Exhibit Dysregulated Metabolism
As mitochondrial metabolism plays a key role in GSIS (Ashcroft and Rorsman, 2012) and Fh1 deletion disrupts the Krebs cycle, we analyzed glucose utilization (3H2O production, reflecting combined flux through the glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathways) and oxidation (CO2 production, reflecting mitochondrial metabolism) (Hellman et al., 1971). In both CTL and Fh1βKO stage II islets, glucose oxidation increased 4-fold when glucose was increased from 1 to 20 mM (Figure 3A). Glucose utilization also increased 4-fold, but the effect was 35%–40% greater in Fh1βKO than CTL islets (Figure 3B), suggestive of increased aerobic glycolysis (O’Flaherty et al., 2010).
Figure 3
Ablation of Fh1 Causes Dysregulated Metabolism
(A) Glucose oxidation in stage II Fh1βKO and CTL islets (n = 7 CTL and n = 16 Fh1βKO mice in 3 experiments) at 1 mM and 20 mM glucose. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus 1 mM glucose; not significant between CTL and Fh1βKO islets.
(B) Glucose utilization in CTL and Fh1βKO islets from stage II mice (n = 7 mice of each genotype in 3 experiments) at 1 mM and 20 mM glucose. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 versus 1 mM glucose; §§p < 0.01 between CTL and Fh1βKO at 20 mM glucose.
(C) Heatmap of metabolites (measured by CE-TOFMS) that show significant concentration differences between islets from stage II CTL (n = 8 mice) and Fh1βKO (n = 7 mice) mice incubated at 5 mM glucose for 1 hr. Red and green for Fh1βKO islets indicate metabolites that are significantly increased or decreased, respectively, versus CTL islets (p < 0.05); Student’s t test. Each column represents values for islets from one animal. Absolute values are given in Table S1. Branch points indicate metabolites linked in common pathways.
(D) Amino acid content in islets of stage II Fh1βKO (gray; n = 12) and CTL (black; n = 8) mice at 20 mM glucose, expressed relative to that at 1 mM glucose (20G/1G) (n = 30 islets per group analyzed in triplicate in 5 experiments). Abbreviations: Asp, aspartate; Glu, glutamic acid; Ser, serine;Gln, glutamine; His, histidine; Gly, glycine; Thr, threonine; Arg, arginine; Tau, taurine; Ala, alanine; Tyr, tyrosine; GABA, gamma aminobutyric acid; Val, valine; Phe, phenylalanine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine.
(E) Insulin secretion from islets from stage II Fh1βKO (gray) and CTL (black) islets (n = 4 experiments; n = 3 mice per genotype) in the presence of 70 mM KCl and 2 mM or 20 mM glucose and 5 mM dimethylglutamate (DMG), as indicated. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus 2 mM glucose in Fh1βKO; ∗∗∗p < 0.0001 versus 2 mM glucose (CTL); §§p < 0.01 CTL versus Fh1βKO in 20 mM glucose.
(F) Insulin secretion in wild-type islets (n = 13 experiments; n = 3 mice) at 1 mM and 20 mM glucose with the addition of dimethyl fumarate (5 mM DMF). ∗∗p < 0.001 or better versus 1 mM glucose.
Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figures S3 and S4 and Table S1.
Ablation of Fh1 Causes Dysregulated Metabolism(A) Glucose oxidation in stage II Fh1βKO and CTL islets (n = 7 CTL and n = 16 Fh1βKO mice in 3 experiments) at 1 mM and 20 mM glucose. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus 1 mM glucose; not significant between CTL and Fh1βKO islets.(B) Glucose utilization in CTL and Fh1βKO islets from stage II mice (n = 7 mice of each genotype in 3 experiments) at 1 mM and 20 mM glucose. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 versus 1 mM glucose; §§p < 0.01 between CTL and Fh1βKO at 20 mM glucose.(C) Heatmap of metabolites (measured by CE-TOFMS) that show significant concentration differences between islets from stage II CTL (n = 8 mice) and Fh1βKO (n = 7 mice) mice incubated at 5 mM glucose for 1 hr. Red and green for Fh1βKO islets indicate metabolites that are significantly increased or decreased, respectively, versus CTL islets (p < 0.05); Student’s t test. Each column represents values for islets from one animal. Absolute values are given in Table S1. Branch points indicate metabolites linked in common pathways.(D) Amino acid content in islets of stage II Fh1βKO (gray; n = 12) and CTL (black; n = 8) mice at 20 mM glucose, expressed relative to that at 1 mM glucose (20G/1G) (n = 30 islets per group analyzed in triplicate in 5 experiments). Abbreviations: Asp, aspartate; Glu, glutamic acid; Ser, serine;Gln, glutamine; His, histidine; Gly, glycine; Thr, threonine; Arg, arginine; Tau, taurine; Ala, alanine; Tyr, tyrosine; GABA, gamma aminobutyric acid; Val, valine; Phe, phenylalanine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine.(E) Insulin secretion from islets from stage II Fh1βKO (gray) and CTL (black) islets (n = 4 experiments; n = 3 mice per genotype) in the presence of 70 mM KCl and 2 mM or 20 mM glucose and 5 mM dimethylglutamate (DMG), as indicated. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus 2 mM glucose in Fh1βKO; ∗∗∗p < 0.0001 versus 2 mM glucose (CTL); §§p < 0.01 CTL versus Fh1βKO in 20 mM glucose.(F) Insulin secretion in wild-type islets (n = 13 experiments; n = 3 mice) at 1 mM and 20 mM glucose with the addition of dimethyl fumarate (5 mM DMF). ∗∗p < 0.001 or better versus 1 mM glucose.Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figures S3 and S4 and Table S1.Metabolite analysis in islets from stage II mice confirmed an overall pattern of changes similar to that observed in other FH-deficient cells (Adam et al., 2011, Frezza et al., 2011). In particular, levels of fumarate, argininosuccinate, and adenylosuccinate were increased, and aspartate was reduced (Figure 3C; Table S1), indicating that FH loss leads to stimulation of the urea cycle/arginine biosynthesis pathway (Adam et al., 2013, Zheng et al., 2013). Levels of AMP, uridine monophosphate (UMP), and guanosine monophosphate (GMP) were decreased, suggesting both purine and pyrimidine metabolism are compromised as a consequence of aspartate depletion, but likely reflect altered adenylosuccinate metabolism due to elevated fumarate (Bulusu et al., 2011). Importantly, no difference was observed in oxidized or reduced glutathione between CTL and Fh1βKO islets, suggesting no major change in ROS or ROS signaling (Sullivan et al., 2013). Islet fumarate and argininosuccinate content were normalized following re-expression of either FH or FHcyt in mice (Figures S3A and S3B).The lack of FH means there is a loss of Krebs-cycle intermediates for every glucose molecule entering the mitochondria. Since metabolism might be maintained by enhanced utilization of amino acids (anaplerosis), we measured 16 key amino acids in islets at both 1 mM and 20 mM glucose. Glucose elevation increased levels of 15 amino acids in CTL islets but had little effect in stage II Fh1βKO islets (Figures 3D, S3C, and S3D).Glutamate may play a key role in both glucose- and incretin-induced insulin secretion, via the amplifying (non-KATP-dependent) pathway (Maechler and Wollheim, 1999). Because the glucose-induced increase in glutamate was lower in Fh1βKO islets than in CTL islets (Figure 3D), we investigated the amplifying pathway of insulin secretion using islets from stage II animals depolarized with 70 mM extracellular K+ (to test the amplifying effect of glucose). Increasing glucose from 2 mM to 20 mM amplified insulin secretion by 600% in CTL islets but only by 150% in Fh1βKO islets (Figure 3E). Addition of exogenous membrane-permeable dimethyl glutamate (DMG; 5 mM) had no effect in CTL islets at either 2 mM or 20 mM glucose but potentiated GSIS in Fh1βKO islets in response to 20 mM glucose (Figure 3E). This suggests that the lack of intermediates, including glutamate, may underlie the impaired insulin release of Fh1βKO islets. Exogenous membrane-permeable dimethyl fumarate (DMF; 5 mM) did not inhibit insulin secretion in CTL islets (Figure 3F), indicating that the acute increase of intracellular fumarate in Fh1βKO islets is not the cause of the impaired GSIS.Some aspects of altered metabolism in Fh1βKO islets were also investigated by comparing glutamine (m0 to m+5) and glucose (m0 to m+6) isotopomers in islets from stage II Fh1βKO and CTL mice incubated in 1 mM or 20 mM glucose with either [U-13C5]-glutamine or 13C6-glucose (Figure S4). Increased levels of fumarate and argininosuccinate, derived from glutamine, were observed in islets subsequently exposed to 20 mM glucose (Figures S4C and S4D). Islets cultured at 20 mM glucose utilized glutamine to generate uridine 5'-diphosphate (UDP)-N-acetylglucosamine (Figures S4H and S4M), a precursor for synthesis of glycosaminoglycans, proteoglycans, and glycolipids (Bond and Hanover, 2013). Substitution of the isotopomers m+2, m+3, m+4, and m+5 for the naturally occurring m+0 and m+1 forms was increased significantly in both glutamate and aspartate in both CTL and Fh1βKO in islets incubated with 20 mM glucose (Figures S4J, S4L, S4N, and S4O).
Progressive Loss of GSIS in Fh1βKO Mice Correlates with Reduced ATP Production and β Cell Electrical Activity
Next, we compared the effects of glucose on ATP production and electrical activity in CTL and Fh1βKO mice. The glucose-induced increase in the ATP/ADP ratio was identical in stage I Fh1βKO and CTL islets (Figure 4A). However, β cells in islets from stage III Fh1βKO mice exhibited far smaller glucose-induced increases in the ATP/ADP ratio than age-matched CTL β cells (Figures 4B and 4C).
Figure 4
Fh1βKO β Cells Exhibit Impaired Electrical Activity and Reduced ATP Production with Age
(A) Glucose-induced changes in the ATP/ADP ratio in β cells from stage I CTL (black) and Fh1βKO (red) mice. Each trace is the average of >200 cells.
(B) Same as in (A) but using islets from stage III CTL and hyperglycemic Fh1βKO mice. Each trace is the average of >200 cells.
(C) Cytoplasmic ATP/ADP ratio at 1 mM and 20 mM glucose in islets from stage I and stage III Fh1βKO and age-matched CTL mice (n = 4 mice per genotype, >200 cells per mouse). Responses are normalized to the ratio at 1 mM glucose. ∗p < 0.05 versus CTL; #p < 0.05 versus basal (3 mM glucose). Error bars represent ± SEM.
(D) Glucose-induced electrical activity in β cells of stage II CTL or Fh1βKO β cells. Traces are representative of 5 (CTL) or 4 (Fh1βKO) β cells from at least 3 mice of each genotype.
(E) Same as in (D) but using islets from stage III CTL and Fh1βKO mice. Traces are representative of 5 (CTL) or 4 (Fh1βKO) β cells from at least 3 mice of each genotype.
Fh1βKO β Cells Exhibit Impaired Electrical Activity and Reduced ATP Production with Age(A) Glucose-induced changes in the ATP/ADP ratio in β cells from stage I CTL (black) and Fh1βKO (red) mice. Each trace is the average of >200 cells.(B) Same as in (A) but using islets from stage III CTL and hyperglycemic Fh1βKO mice. Each trace is the average of >200 cells.(C) Cytoplasmic ATP/ADP ratio at 1 mM and 20 mM glucose in islets from stage I and stage III Fh1βKO and age-matched CTL mice (n = 4 mice per genotype, >200 cells per mouse). Responses are normalized to the ratio at 1 mM glucose. ∗p < 0.05 versus CTL; #p < 0.05 versus basal (3 mM glucose). Error bars represent ± SEM.(D) Glucose-induced electrical activity in β cells of stage II CTL or Fh1βKO β cells. Traces are representative of 5 (CTL) or 4 (Fh1βKO) β cells from at least 3 mice of each genotype.(E) Same as in (D) but using islets from stage III CTL and Fh1βKO mice. Traces are representative of 5 (CTL) or 4 (Fh1βKO) β cells from at least 3 mice of each genotype.Glucose-induced electrical activity in β cells from stage II Fh1βKO mice was similar to that of CTL islets (Figure 4D). However, clear differences were observed in stage III mice. Whereas CTL β cells responded to 20 mM glucose with membrane depolarization and action potential firing, β cells in stage III Fh1βKO islets were refractory to glucose stimulation (Figure 4E). In such glucose-unresponsive Fh1βKO β cells, electrical activity was elicited by the KATP-channel blocker tolbutamide. Together, these data suggest that glucose is unable to inhibit KATP channels in stage III Fh1-deficient β cells, because ATP generation is reduced.
Fh1 Deletion Causes Disruption of β Cell Mitochondrial Ultrastructure
The morphology, size, and distribution of mitochondria in β cells of stage II mice were analyzed by electron microscopy. Whereas mitochondria in CTL β cells had normal morphology with clear cristae, many mitochondria in Fh1βKO β cells were swollen without clear cristae, and some were very large (>1.25 μm in diameter). There was larger range in the mitochondrial area in Fh1βKO β cells, suggesting an imbalance between mitochondrial fission and fusion (Figures S5A and S5B). Mitochondria in islets from Fh1βKO+FH (full-length FH rescue) or Fh1βKO+FHcyt (cytoplasmic FH rescue) mice were similar to those of CTL mice (Figure S5B).
Protein Succination in Diabetic Islets
Fumarate reacts with cysteine residues in proteins in a non-enzymatic process known as succination. Using an antibody (2SC) that labels succinated proteins specifically (Blatnik et al., 2008), we confirmed that succination was detected in Fh1βKO β cells and not in CTL β cells (Figures 5A and 5B).
Figure 5
Succination Is a Feature of Elevated Fumarate
(A) IHC for 2SC in islets from stage II CTL (left) and Fh1βKO (right) islets (n > 300 islets from 10 mice of each genotype). Scale bar, 20 μm.
(B) Immunofluorescence for 2SC (green), insulin (red), glucagon (purple), nuclei (blue), and overlay in a representative islet from a stage III Fh1βKO mouse (n > 100 islets from n > 10 Fh1βKO mice). Scale bar, 20 μm.
(C) Fumarate content determined by CE-TOFMS in islets from stage II Fh1βKO mice (gray; all islets from n = 6 mice) and CTL mice (black; all islets from n = 6 mice) incubated for 1 hr at 1 mM or 20 mM glucose. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus 1 mM glucose; §§§p < 0.01 versus CTL.
(D) Western blot of FH protein in islets from stage II CTL mice (all islets from n = 3 mice) cultured for 24 hr at 5 mM or 20 mM glucose. Cnx, calnexin, loading control.
(E) Fumarate content measured by CE-TOFMS of islets from human ND donors (4 donors) incubated for 1 hr at 1 mM or 20 mM glucose. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus 1 mM glucose.
(F) Fumarate content determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in human ND (31 donors) or T2D (7 donors) islets cultured at 2.8 mM and 16.7 mM glucose. Content is expressed relative to that of ND islets at 2.8 mM glucose.
(G and H) MS/MS spectra for the GAPDH-derived peptide IVSNASCTTNCLAPLAK in its non-succinated (G) and succinated (H) forms in stage II Fh1βKO and CTL islets (at least 150 islets per genotype). The calculated peptide mass based on the detected m/z (m, mass; z, charge) value of the doubly charged precursor peptide ion ([M+2H]2+) and the calculated ([M] calc.) and theoretical peptide mass ([M] theor.) are stated for both peptide species. Detected N- and C-terminal fragment ions are indicated in the peptide sequence, assigned in the spectrum and depicted as follows: b: N-terminal fragment ion; y: C-terminal fragment ion; ∗: fragment ion minus NH3; and 2+: doubly charged fragment ion. Both theoretical mass (in brackets) and detected mass are given for each assigned fragment ion. Peptide fragments that include the succinated cysteine residue are highlighted in red, while unsuccinated fragments are depicted in green.
Insets in (G) and (H) show the extracted ion chromatograms of the precursor peptide from a representative triplicate run of analyzed pancreatic islets. Quantification of the peptide, corresponding to residues 144–160 of Gapdh, succinated at C150, indicate that the succinated peptide was enriched by 270%, while the unmodified peptide was decreased by 70%. PE indicates the modification of cysteine residues at C150 and C154 to pyridylethyl-cysteine in the inset in (G) and only C154 in (H). Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figure S6 and Table S2.
Succination Is a Feature of Elevated Fumarate(A) IHC for 2SC in islets from stage II CTL (left) and Fh1βKO (right) islets (n > 300 islets from 10 mice of each genotype). Scale bar, 20 μm.(B) Immunofluorescence for 2SC (green), insulin (red), glucagon (purple), nuclei (blue), and overlay in a representative islet from a stage III Fh1βKO mouse (n > 100 islets from n > 10 Fh1βKO mice). Scale bar, 20 μm.(C) Fumarate content determined by CE-TOFMS in islets from stage II Fh1βKO mice (gray; all islets from n = 6 mice) and CTL mice (black; all islets from n = 6 mice) incubated for 1 hr at 1 mM or 20 mM glucose. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus 1 mM glucose; §§§p < 0.01 versus CTL.(D) Western blot of FH protein in islets from stage II CTL mice (all islets from n = 3 mice) cultured for 24 hr at 5 mM or 20 mM glucose. Cnx, calnexin, loading control.(E) Fumarate content measured by CE-TOFMS of islets from human ND donors (4 donors) incubated for 1 hr at 1 mM or 20 mM glucose. ∗∗p < 0.01 versus 1 mM glucose.(F) Fumarate content determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in human ND (31 donors) or T2D (7 donors) islets cultured at 2.8 mM and 16.7 mM glucose. Content is expressed relative to that of ND islets at 2.8 mM glucose.(G and H) MS/MS spectra for the GAPDH-derived peptide IVSNASCTTNCLAPLAK in its non-succinated (G) and succinated (H) forms in stage II Fh1βKO and CTL islets (at least 150 islets per genotype). The calculated peptide mass based on the detected m/z (m, mass; z, charge) value of the doubly charged precursor peptide ion ([M+2H]2+) and the calculated ([M] calc.) and theoretical peptide mass ([M] theor.) are stated for both peptide species. Detected N- and C-terminal fragment ions are indicated in the peptide sequence, assigned in the spectrum and depicted as follows: b: N-terminal fragment ion; y: C-terminal fragment ion; ∗: fragment ion minus NH3; and 2+: doubly charged fragment ion. Both theoretical mass (in brackets) and detected mass are given for each assigned fragment ion. Peptide fragments that include the succinated cysteine residue are highlighted in red, while unsuccinated fragments are depicted in green.Insets in (G) and (H) show the extracted ion chromatograms of the precursor peptide from a representative triplicate run of analyzed pancreatic islets. Quantification of the peptide, corresponding to residues 144–160 of Gapdh, succinated at C150, indicate that the succinated peptide was enriched by 270%, while the unmodified peptide was decreased by 70%. PE indicates the modification of cysteine residues at C150 and C154 to pyridylethyl-cysteine in the inset in (G) and only C154 in (H). Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figure S6 and Table S2.Culture of adipocytes in high glucose elevates fumarate and results in protein succination (Nagai et al., 2007). Therefore, we determined quantitatively whether hyperglycemia would increase fumarate in islets. Fumarate levels were ∼100-fold higher in stage II Fh1βKO islets, even after 1 hr incubation at 1 mM glucose, yet they were further increased at 20 mM glucose (Figure 5C). Glucose also increased fumarate levels in CTL islets; 1 hr incubation at 20 mM glucose increased fumarate levels 12-fold, compared to islets incubated at 1 mM glucose. This was not due to a reduction in FH (Figure 5D) and, thus, is likely a consequence of the enhanced glucose metabolism. Similar acute (1 hr) effects of high glucose on fumarate content were observed in ND human islets (Figures 5E and 5F). Interestingly, the fumarate content of islets from donors with type 2 diabetes (T2D) was higher than that in ND islets, and high glucose produced no further increase (Figure 5F).Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis of islets from stage II Fh1βKO mice islets detected succination of key cysteine residues in glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; residue C150) (Figures 5G and 5H), guanosine monophosphate reductase (GMPR; C186) (Figure S6A; Table S2), and Parkinson’s disease (autosomal recessive, early onset) 7 (PARK 7/DJ-1; C106). Succination of PARK7/DJ-1 (C106) was also observed in islets from a human T2D donor (Figure S6B; Table S2).Succination of residue C150 of GAPDH was increased by 270% in Fh1βKO islets (Figures 5G and 5H). Succination of GAPDH, detected in the gastrocnemius muscle of diabetic rats, has been shown to reduce enzyme activity (Blatnik et al., 2008). This might limit glucose flux through glycolysis, leading to accumulation of upstream glycolytic 3- and 6-carbon intermediates. We tested the possible functional consequences by culturing CTL islets for 24 hr in the presence of 10 mM of the triose D-glyceraldehyde. This resulted in the complete loss of GSIS and correlated with a slight increase in islet insulin content (Figures S7A and S7B).
Impact of Fh1 Deletion on Cytosolic Calcium and pH
Links have been proposed between glucose and pHi (Shepherd and Henquin, 1995). The loss of glucose- and Ca2+-dependent electrical activity in stage III Fh1βKO β cells is predicted to cause an alteration in Ca2+ handling. Intracellular accumulation of fumarate, the anion of fumaric acid, may lower cytoplasmic pH (pHi) and thereby compromise GSIS, effects compounded by the inhibition of GAPDH and accumulation of acidic trioses. Therefore, we performed parallel measurements of [Ca2+]i and pHi in stages I and III Fh1βKO β cells and CTL cells. Changes in [Ca2+]i were similar in stage I CTL and Fh1βKO β cells (Figures 6A and 6B). Thus, glucose, glyceraldehyde, and high K+-induced membrane depolarization increased [Ca2+]i. Tolbutamide had little additional stimulatory effect on [Ca2+]i when tested in the presence of 20 mM glucose (cf. Figure 4E). Although basal pHi was slightly lower in β cells from stage I Fh1βKO mice than in CTL cells (as expected from the elevated fumarate), the responses to glucose and glyceraldehyde were similar (Figures 6A, 6B, and 6E): glucose and glyceraldehyde lowered pHi reversibly in both CTL and Fh1βKO β cells, and high-[K+]o depolarization produced a further drop in pHi.
Figure 6
Effect of Fh1 Deletion on [Ca2+]i and pHi in β Cells
(A and B) Top: simultaneous measurements of [Ca2+]i (green) and pHi (red) in β-cells within intact pancreatic islets from stage I CTL (A) and Fh1βKO (B) mice exposed to 3 mM or 20 mM glucose, 10 mM D-glyceraldehyde, 30 mM K+, or 0.1 mM tolbutamide. The dashed line indicates basal pHi. Bottom: heatmaps showing pHi (red) and [Ca2+]i (green) responses for individual cells (>20 cells within a single islet). Color intensity indicates concentration range from low (black) to high (white). See calibration bars at right.
(C and D) Same as in (A) and (B) but using islets from stage III CTL (C) and Fh1βKO (D) mice.
(E) Mean ± SEM fluorescence ratio (left) at 3 mM glucose, with or without 10 mM D-glyceraldehyde or 20 mM glucose in β cells from stage I (gray bars) Fh1βKO (n = 95 cells from 2 mice) and stage III (white bars) Fh1βKO (n = 39 cells from 4 mice) mouse islets. #p < 0.05 versus basal (3 mM) glucose and CTL (n = 163 cells from 6 mice; there was no difference between stage I and stage III CTL β cells, and data have been pooled for display). ∗p < 0.05 versus CTL; ¶p < 0.05 versus stage I Fh1βKO β cells. Approximate changes in calibrated pHi are shown (right).
Effect of Fh1 Deletion on [Ca2+]i and pHi in β Cells(A and B) Top: simultaneous measurements of [Ca2+]i (green) and pHi (red) in β-cells within intact pancreatic islets from stage I CTL (A) and Fh1βKO (B) mice exposed to 3 mM or 20 mM glucose, 10 mM D-glyceraldehyde, 30 mM K+, or 0.1 mM tolbutamide. The dashed line indicates basal pHi. Bottom: heatmaps showing pHi (red) and [Ca2+]i (green) responses for individual cells (>20 cells within a single islet). Color intensity indicates concentration range from low (black) to high (white). See calibration bars at right.(C and D) Same as in (A) and (B) but using islets from stage III CTL (C) and Fh1βKO (D) mice.(E) Mean ± SEM fluorescence ratio (left) at 3 mM glucose, with or without 10 mM D-glyceraldehyde or 20 mM glucose in β cells from stage I (gray bars) Fh1βKO (n = 95 cells from 2 mice) and stage III (white bars) Fh1βKO (n = 39 cells from 4 mice) mouse islets. #p < 0.05 versus basal (3 mM) glucose and CTL (n = 163 cells from 6 mice; there was no difference between stage I and stage III CTL β cells, and data have been pooled for display). ∗p < 0.05 versus CTL; ¶p < 0.05 versus stage I Fh1βKO β cells. Approximate changes in calibrated pHi are shown (right).The [Ca2+]i and pHi responses of CTL β cells did not change with age, in contrast to the responses of those of stage III Fh1KβO mice (Figures 6C–6E). Both glucose and D-glyceraldehyde were without effect on [Ca2+]I, and tolbutamide was only effective in some β cells. However, high [K+]o depolarization (which bypasses metabolism) consistently increased [Ca2+]i. Basal pHi was lower in stage III Fh1βKO β cells than either CTL or stage I Fh1βKO β cells (Figures 6C–6E). Increasing glucose to 20 mM or the addition of 10 mM D-glyceraldehyde reduced pHi in CTL β cells but did not cause further acidification in stage III Fh1βKO β cells (Figures 6D and 6E).
Impaired GSIS in Fh1βKO Islets Is a Consequence of Hyperglycemia
We reasoned that the deterioration of GSIS in Fh1βKO islets over time might be a consequence of the progressive hyperglycemia (Brereton et al., 2014). We tested whether the impairment of GSIS could be reversed. Freshly isolated islets from stage III Fh1βKO mice were refractory to 6 mM glucose, and the response to 20 mM glucose was only 30% of that seen in CTL islets (Figure 7A), echoing the data from the perfusion experiments (Figure 2B).
Figure 7
GSIS Dysfunction in Diabetic Fh1βKO Islets Can Be Reversed by “Normoglycemia”
(A) Insulin secretion from freshly isolated islets from stage III Fh1βKO (gray) and CTL (black) littermates at 1 mM, 6 mM, or 20 mM glucose during static incubation (n = 12–18 experimental groups of islets from at least 8 mice of each genotype in a total of 3 experiments). ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 versus 1 mM glucose; ¶¶¶¶p < 0.0001 versus 6 mM glucose; §§§§p < 0.0001 versus 20 mM glucose in CTL.
(B) Insulin secretion from the same islets as in (A) after 65-hr culture at 12 mM glucose. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 versus 1 mM glucose; ¶¶p < 0.01 versus 6 mM glucose; §§§§p < 0.0001 versus 20 mM glucose in CTL.
(C) Insulin content of islets used in (B). §§§§p < 0.0001.
(D) Insulin secretion in islets isolated from stage III Fh1βKO mice measured in static incubations at 1 mM or 20 mM glucose after 72-hr culture at 20 mM glucose with or without 10 mM mannoheptulose (n = 3 mice). ¶¶¶p < 0.001 versus 1 mM glucose; #p < 0.05, and ###p < 0.001 versus corresponding condition without prior culture in the presence of mannoheptulose.
Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figure S7.
GSIS Dysfunction in Diabetic Fh1βKO Islets Can Be Reversed by “Normoglycemia”(A) Insulin secretion from freshly isolated islets from stage III Fh1βKO (gray) and CTL (black) littermates at 1 mM, 6 mM, or 20 mM glucose during static incubation (n = 12–18 experimental groups of islets from at least 8 mice of each genotype in a total of 3 experiments). ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 versus 1 mM glucose; ¶¶¶¶p < 0.0001 versus 6 mM glucose; §§§§p < 0.0001 versus 20 mM glucose in CTL.(B) Insulin secretion from the same islets as in (A) after 65-hr culture at 12 mM glucose. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 versus 1 mM glucose; ¶¶p < 0.01 versus 6 mM glucose; §§§§p < 0.0001 versus 20 mM glucose in CTL.(C) Insulin content of islets used in (B). §§§§p < 0.0001.(D) Insulin secretion in islets isolated from stage III Fh1βKO mice measured in static incubations at 1 mM or 20 mM glucose after 72-hr culture at 20 mM glucose with or without 10 mM mannoheptulose (n = 3 mice). ¶¶¶p < 0.001 versus 1 mM glucose; #p < 0.05, and ###p < 0.001 versus corresponding condition without prior culture in the presence of mannoheptulose.Error bars represent ± SEM. See also Figure S7.After culture at 12 mM glucose for ∼65 hr, secretory responses in CTL islets were essentially the same as in freshly isolated islets. However, GSIS at 20 mM glucose was dramatically improved in Fh1βKO islets and approached that of the CTL islets (Figure 7B). Insulin content was 35% lower in Fh1βKO than in CTL islets (Figure 7C).Finally, we tested whether the loss of GSIS in stage III Fh1βKO islets reflects a direct “glucotoxic” effect or is related to accelerated glucose metabolism. Distinct from what was seen following culture at 12 mM glucose (Figures 7A and 7B), islets from stage III Fh1βKO mice cultured for 3 days at 20 mM glucose showed no recovery of GSIS. By contrast, islets cultured in the presence of the glucokinase inhibitor mannoheptulose (Zelent et al., 2005, Coore and Randle, 1964) exhibited some (limited) glucose responsiveness (Figure 7D).
Discussion
We show here that lack of the Krebs-cycle enzyme FH causes a progressive deterioration of β cell function, resulting in severe diabetes associated with impaired oxidative metabolism, ATP production, intracellular calcium handling, and cytosolic acidification.Distinct from the mouse model in which Vhl is deleted in β cells (Zehetner et al., 2008, Cantley et al., 2009), we found that the diabetes associated with Fh1 loss is Hif1α and Nrf2 independent. Our data are consistent with earlier observations that, while Fh1 deletion leads to the accumulation of fumarate, and HIF1α is stabilized, many associated functional changes are independent of HIF1α (O’Flaherty et al., 2010, Adam et al., 2013, Ternette et al., 2013). Similar to previous studies, we were unable to detect HIF1α in normal β cells, and deletion of Hif1α alone did not disrupt glucose homeostasis (Zehetner et al., 2008, Cantley et al., 2009). However, it remains unclear whether β cell dysfunction and diabetes are caused by HIF1α stabilization or vice versa (Cantley et al., 2010, Girgis et al., 2012). In the Fh1βKO mouse, loss of glucose regulation appears entirely attributable to FH. The hyperglycemia that develops may drive HIF1α stabilization, perhaps compounding GSIS impairment further in a feedback loop.
Why Do Young (Stage 1) Fh1βKO Mice Have Normal Glucose Tolerance?
Given the importance of mitochondrial metabolism for insulin secretion, the mild phenotype of stage I Fh1βKO mice was surprising, not least as Fh1 deletion led to >100-fold accumulation of fumarate, consistent with arrest of the Krebs cycle at FH. Because insulin secretion was unimpaired, this suggests that refilling of Krebs-cycle intermediates (anaplerosis) must occur distal to FH. Labeling experiments in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking Fh1 show that fumarate exits the mitochondria to the cytoplasm but is then metabolized to aspartate via the urea cycle, which re-enters the Krebs cycle (Adam et al., 2013). Studying metabolism in murine pancreatic islets is difficult because of the limited amounts of material available, especially from the diabetic islets. Our analyses of Fh1βKO islets by capillary electrophoresis time of flight MS (CE-TOFMS) indicate similar disruption of the urea cycle and purine metabolism and explain, in part, why the diabetic phenotype of Fh1βKO mice can be rescued by re-expression of cytosolic FH. Moreover, Fh1βKO islets exhibit increased utilization and oxidation of glucose, consistent with aerobic glycolysis, recapitulating previous observations made when Fh1 was deleted in MEFs and mouse kidney (O’Flaherty et al., 2010, Adam et al., 2013).Normally, excess Krebs-cycle reactants are used to produce amino acids via cataplerosis (Choi et al., 2011, MacDonald et al., 2005). However, in Fh1βKO islets, amino acid content tended to be reduced, and glucose did not increase the content of several amino acids; for example, glutamate. This is of interest because glutamate has been implicated in the amplification of GSIS (Maechler and Wollheim, 2000). Exogenous dimethyl glutamate restored GSIS in Fh1βKO islets but had no effect in CTL islets. These data support the idea that glutamate functions as an “amplification signal.” Another possibility is that exogenous glutamate may restore GSIS by feeding into the Krebs cycle and partially restoring mitochondrial metabolism (Frezza et al., 2011).Despite the ∼50% reduction in insulin content, the response to 20 mM glucose was maintained in stage II Fh1βKO mice. We speculate that Fh1βKO β cells may compensate for the reduction of insulin content by stimulation of insulin exocytosis. Fh1βKO islets contain significantly elevated levels of adenylosuccinate, which has been proposed to stimulate exocytosis by inhibition of the sentrin/SUMO-specific protease 1 (Gooding et al., 2015).
Rapid Progression to Diabetes in Stage II Fh1βKO Mice
Once slight hyperglycemia developed, rapid deterioration of glycemic control was observed (up to 10 mM/week). We speculate that a small elevation of plasma glucose induces a vicious cycle of impaired insulin secretion and hyperglycemia. In part, this arises because, as blood glucose increases, more glucose enters metabolism, causing even greater stress on the β cell with increased fumarate levels. It is possible that metabolism of cytosolic fumarate and anaplerosis eventually become unable to maintain the Krebs cycle and that, once this occurs, rapid deterioration of both GSIS and glucose tolerance occurs.
Why Do Fh1βKO Mice Become Glucose Intolerant?
Our results indicate that Fh1βKO mice eventually develop diabetes because glucose is no longer able to stimulate insulin secretion. This is because of a failure of mitochondrial metabolism that culminates in impaired ATP production, defective KATP-channel closure, and suppression of electrical activity and [Ca2+]i.Why does ATP production fail? Pumping H+ across the inner mitochondrial membrane, the electron transport chain produces the alkalinization of the mitochondrial matrix (Wiederkehr et al., 2009) and membrane hyperpolarization, which are needed to drive ATP synthesis in β cells. Fumaric acid (C4H4O4) is an acid with two hydroxyl groups with pKa of 3.0 and 4.4; thus, loss of FH activity can accordingly be expected to result in acidification not just of the cytoplasm (experimentally measured) but also of the mitochondrial matrix.There is a sigmoidal relationship between glucose concentration and mitochondrial metabolism (Ashcroft et al., 1970, Hellman et al., 1971). At low glucose concentrations, the Krebs cycle runs at a fairly low rate, and the amount of fumarate generated and deposited in the cytosol will be low. Thus, if Fh1βKO mice remain normoglycemic, cytoplasmic acidification will be modest. In agreement with this idea, glucose-responsive β-cells from stage I Fh1βKO mice had a higher pHi than β cells from stage III mice. At higher plasma glucose levels, mitochondrial glucose metabolism will accelerate due to the increased substrate, leading to greater fumarate generation, acidification of both cytoplasmic and mitochondrial matrices, and a progressive impairment of ATP production. Also, acidification may influence the activity of other enzymes involved in β cell metabolism with optimal activity at alkaline pH (e.g., Bernstein and Everse, 1978, Lai and Cooper, 1986, Willson and Tipton, 1980). These effects may be aggravated by downregulation of key genes involved in mitochondrial metabolism, as seen in a mouse model of diabetes caused by a gain-of-function mutation in the KATP channel (βV59M mice; Brereton et al., 2016). These scenarios are not mutually exclusive, and it is possible that they operate in parallel and that both contribute to the loss of ATP production and GSIS. Both these hypotheses predict that inhibition of glucose metabolism should exert a protective effect on β cell metabolism. This proved to be the case, as GSIS was restored in Fh1βKO islets following “normoglycemic” culture or culture in high glucose with the glucokinase inhibitor mannoheptulose.
Fumarate Accumulation Leads to Protein Succination
Our data demonstrate that elevation of intracellular fumarate is associated with “hyperglycemia” in both mouse and human islets. We detected succination of critical cysteines in GAPDH, GMPR, and PARK7/DJ-1 proteins in Fh1βKO islets. Succination of GAPDH has been reported previously in adipocytes in diabetic db/db and ob/ob mice. It is a marker of impaired mitochondrial metabolism and has functional effects (Blatnik et al., 2008, Frizzell et al., 2011). Reduced PARK7/DJ1 activity is compatible with the small mitochondria (suggestive of mitochondrial fragmentation and impaired function) seen in Fh1βKO islets. Interestingly, we found that fumarate levels are elevated in islets from T2D donors and may, via succination, explain why expression of PARK7 is reduced in T2D islets (Jain et al., 2012). Importantly, it also suggests that mitochondrial metabolism is impaired in islets, leading to elevated fumarate and succination.
Conclusions
Our studies suggest a cycle in which progressive hyperglycemia in Fh1βKO mice leads to the deterioration of metabolism, culminating in the loss of GSIS and frank diabetes. Although β cells from young Fh1βKO mice are glucose responsive, subtle differences exist between Fh1βKO and CTL islets. Thus, GSIS is impaired at 6 mM glucose in Fh1βKO mice, compared to CTL mice. This defect may underlie the slight elevation in plasma glucose that precedes the more rapid deterioration in glucose tolerance. Our hypothesis is consistent with the proposal that hyperglycemia, via β cell decompensation, initiates a cycle of progressive hyperglycemia and impaired GSIS (Weir and Bonner-Weir, 2004).In severely diabetic mice expressing the gain-of-function KATP channel mutation V59M (Brereton et al., 2014), the adverse effects on β cell function and insulin content were reversed following restoration of normoglycemia. Similarly, the severe impairment of GSIS seen in diabetic (stage III) Fh1βKO islets was almost fully corrected simply by culturing the islets under “normoglycemic” conditions. This agrees with the report that GSIS is restored in long-term T2D patients following normalization of plasma glucose levels and suppression of hepatic glucose production induced by a low-calorie diet (Lim et al., 2011).We propose that the Fh1βKO mouse provides a valuable new model for T2D. In particular, it is not obese, and the glucose intolerance develops in an age-dependent fashion. Thus, it provides a useful tool for studying the progression observed in T2D and to interrogate the systemic and cellular consequences of metabolic dysfunction in the pancreatic β cell without the complications of altered diet and/or obesity.
Experimental Procedures
See also Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
Mice
Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the UK Animals Scientific Procedures Act (1986) and University of Oxford local ethical guidelines. We used male and female adult mice of the following strains: Fh1Rip2-Cre+/− (Fh1 crossed with Tg(Ins2-Cre)Cre recombinase, Rip2-Cre+/−), Fh1tm1PjpHif1αRip2-Cre+/−, Fh1Rip2-Cre+/−Gt(ROSA)26Sor;Tg(Cdh16-cre)91Igr, Fh1Gt(ROSA)26SorTg(Cdh16-cre)91Igr, and Fh1Rip2-Cre+/−Nrf2−/− mice (designated Fh1βKO, Fh1Hif1αβKO, Fh1βKO+FH, Fh1βKO+FHcyt, and Fh1β/Nrf2KO, respectively) and littermate controls (designated CTL). The constitutive Nrf2 KO mouse was generated from an embryonic stem cell (ESC) clone obtained from Riken, Japan. Genotyping was performed by Transnetyx, but primer details and PCR conditions can be obtained from J.A. NMRI and C57BL/6J mice (designated wild-type) purchased commercially were used in a few cases.
IHC
Mouse tissues were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, dehydrated, and processed for paraffin wax embedding and sectioning (3 μm). H&E sections were generated for all samples. IHC was carried out using the EnVision Kit (Dako) as per the manufacturer’s protocol, with the following antibodies: FH (Autogen Bioclear), HIF1α (Cayman), insulin (MP Biomedicals), glucagon (MP Biomedicals and Sigma), and 2SC (Nagai et al., 2007).
Intraperitoneal Glucose Tolerance Test
Blood glucose levels were determined with an Accuchek Aviva meter after 16 hr of fasting and at time points following intraperitoneal injection of 2 g glucose per kilogram of body weight. Animals were culled at the end of the test, and pancreata were processed as described earlier.
Hormone Secretion and Content Measurements
Insulin secretion was measured by in situ pancreas perfusion or in static incubations of isolated islets (Zhang et al., 2013). Insulin content was determined in parallel from isolated islets or from mouse pancreata harvested separately.
Quantitative Imaging of ATP, Ca2+, and pHi
Time-lapse imaging of the ATP/ADP ratio in mouse islets was performed using 10×–14× magnification on a Zeiss AxioZoom.V16 microscope. Islets were infected with an adenovirus (3 × 104 plaque-forming units [PFUs] per islet) delivering Perceval, a recombinant sensor of ATP/ADP (Berg et al., 2009). Groups of islets isolated from CTL and Fh1βKO animals were imaged simultaneously 24 hr post-infection at glucose concentrations as indicated, with single-cell resolution. Time-lapse images were collected every 30 s, and the bath solution was perifused at 60 μL/min at 34°C.Simultaneous time-lapse imaging of [Ca2+]i and pHi in mouse islets was performed on the inverted Zeiss AxioVert 200 microscope, equipped with the Zeiss LSM 510-META laser confocal scanning system, using a 40×/1.3 NA objective. Mouse islets were loaded with 6 μM of the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fluo-4 for 90 min before being transferred to a separate solution containing 6 μM of the pH-sensitive dye SNARF-5F (both dyes from Molecular Probes) for a further 50 min at room temperature and imaged using an open chamber at 34°C. The bath solution containing various stimuli was perifused continuously at the rate of 200 μL/min. The ratiometric dye SNARF-5F was excited at 543 nm, and emission was collected at 650 nm and 600 nm. Fluo-4 was excited at 488 nm and imaged at 530 nm. Images were acquired at the frequency of 0.03 Hz. The pH calibration of each trace was performed using the high K+-nigericin technique. Valinomycin (5 μM) was added to the extracellular solution to abolish the K+ gradient (Tarasov et al., 2012, Tarasov et al., 2013).
Statistical Analysis
Image sequences were analyzed (registration, background subtraction, ROI intensity versus time analysis) using open-source FIJI software (http://fiji.sc/Fiji). The numerical time series data were analyzed using the IgorPro package (Wavemetrics). Statistical significance of the differences between paired or unpaired samples was tested using Friedman or Kruskall-Wallis tests, respectively, with Nemenyi post hoc analysis, as implemented in the R package (R Development Core Team, 2016). Basal pHi was calculated by taking the mean of the first 15 SNARF-5F ratio values from each cell. After glyceraldehyde and 20 mM glucose application, pHi was calculated by taking a mean of the values when the SNARF-5F ratio reached a nadir. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered significant. Cells that were not active at 3 mM glucose and that responded to high glucose with the characteristic [Ca2+]i oscillations were taken as β cells.All data are given as mean ± SEM unless indicated that they are mean ± SD. Other than for image analysis, as indicated earlier, statistical significance was determined with significance set at <0.05, using either ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison or Student’s t test (where indicated). Statistical significance was determined using GraphPad Prism v.6.0d (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA; http://www.graphpad.com).
Human Islets and Ethics
Pancreatic islets were isolated from deceased donors under ethical approval obtained from the local human research ethics committees in both Oxford and Lund. All donors gave informed research consent. Islets were obtained from the Diabetes Research & Wellness Foundation Human Islet Isolation Facility, OCDEM, University of Oxford, and the Nordic Center for Clinical Islet Transplantation (http://www.nordicislets.com; Uppsala, Sweden) via the Human Tissue Laboratory at Lund University Diabetes Centre. Islets were hand picked, and their quality was assessed prior to research use. Experiments in Oxford were performed using islets from donors (5 females and 1 male) with the following parameters: age, 47.8 years ± 6.7 years; BMI, 28.4 ± 5.8. In Lund, the characteristics of ND (n = 31, CTL) and diabetic (n = 7, T2D) islet donors were as follows: age (years), 61.24 ± 10.45 (CTL) and 60.43 ± 7.72 (T2D), p = 0.82; sex, expressed as male/female, 14/7 (CTL) and 2/5 (T2D), p = 0.44; BMI, 27.11 ± 3.06 (CTL) and 28.9 ± 5.35 (T2D), p = 0.42; and HbA1c, 5.85 ± 0.45 (CTL) and 6.41 ± 0.56, p = 0.04. Data are given as mean ± SD; groups were compared using the Student’s t test or using two-tailed Fisher’s exact test.
Author Contributions
J.A., P.J.P., and P.R. designed the study. J.A., R.R., M.V.C., N.T., A.H., A.I.T., Q.Z., E.R., N.J.G.R., R.M.d.R., G.O., H.W.D., P.S., K.S., K.K., K.I., B.M.K., J.T.-R., H.M., A.C., T.S., and P.J.P. collected and analyzed the data. A.L., A.S., C.W.P., N.F., and P.R. analyzed data and contributed expertise. P.J.P., M.V.C., A.S., A.I.T., and J.A. made the final figures. J.A., A.S., P.J.P., P.R., and F.M.A. wrote the manuscript, which was critically edited by all authors.
Authors: Thorsten Cramer; Yuji Yamanishi; Björn E Clausen; Irmgard Förster; Rafal Pawlinski; Nigel Mackman; Volker H Haase; Rudolf Jaenisch; Maripat Corr; Victor Nizet; Gary S Firestein; Hans Peter Gerber; Napoleone Ferrara; Randall S Johnson Journal: Cell Date: 2003-03-07 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: K Itoh; T Chiba; S Takahashi; T Ishii; K Igarashi; Y Katoh; T Oyake; N Hayashi; K Satoh; I Hatayama; M Yamamoto; Y Nabeshima Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1997-07-18 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Jens Zehetner; Carsten Danzer; Stephan Collins; Katrin Eckhardt; Philipp A Gerber; Pia Ballschmieter; Juris Galvanovskis; Kenju Shimomura; Frances M Ashcroft; Bernard Thorens; Patrik Rorsman; Wilhelm Krek Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Jessica R Gooding; Mette V Jensen; Xiaoqing Dai; Brett R Wenner; Danhong Lu; Ramamani Arumugam; Mourad Ferdaoussi; Patrick E MacDonald; Christopher B Newgard Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Julie Adam; Emine Hatipoglu; Linda O'Flaherty; Nicola Ternette; Natasha Sahgal; Helen Lockstone; Dilair Baban; Emma Nye; Gordon W Stamp; Kathryn Wolhuter; Marcus Stevens; Roman Fischer; Peter Carmeliet; Patrick H Maxwell; Chris W Pugh; Norma Frizzell; Tomoyoshi Soga; Benedikt M Kessler; Mona El-Bahrawy; Peter J Ratcliffe; Patrick J Pollard Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 38.585
Authors: Melissa F Brereton; Michaela Iberl; Kenju Shimomura; Quan Zhang; Alice E Adriaenssens; Peter Proks; Ioannis I Spiliotis; William Dace; Katia K Mattis; Reshma Ramracheya; Fiona M Gribble; Frank Reimann; Anne Clark; Patrik Rorsman; Frances M Ashcroft Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Thomas D Niehaus; Jacob Folz; Donald R McCarty; Arthur J L Cooper; David Moraga Amador; Oliver Fiehn; Andrew D Hanson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Sooyeon Lee; Haixia Xu; Aidan Van Vleck; Alex M Mawla; Albert Mao Li; Jiangbin Ye; Mark O Huising; Justin P Annes Journal: Diabetes Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 9.337
Authors: Hu Zhu; Olivia W Lee; Pranav Shah; Ajit Jadhav; Xin Xu; Samarjit Patnaik; Min Shen; Matthew D Hall Journal: SLAS Discov Date: 2019-09-14 Impact factor: 3.341