Literature DB >> 28954210

Gonial angle growth patterns according to age and gender.

Carolina Larrazabal-Moron1, Juan A Sanchis-Gimeno2.   

Abstract

Currently there are controversial results about gender and age differences in human gonial angle values. In this context we aimed to ascertain the gender and age differences in the gonial angle values of young Caucasian Mediterranean subjects. We tested the hypothesis of a relation between the gonial angle values and the gender and age of the subjects by means of a prospective study involving 266 subjects. Panoramic radiographs (Cranex Novus®, XMIND Novus® Soredex, France) were carried out in order to measure the gonial angle values. We found significant differences between females and males in the subgroups aged ≤10years old (128.6±3.4 vs 126.8±4.5, p=0.017), 16-20 years old (119.1±5.6 vs 122.3±7.7, p=0.011), 21-25 years old (117.6±5.2 vs 120.8±7.0, p=0.016) and 26-30 years old (117.5±5.4 vs 120.6±5.4, p=0.019) but not in the subgroup aged 11-15 years old (123.4±5.2 vs 123.5±5.4, p=0.927). A significant negative correlation was found between age and gonial angle values (r=-0.365, p<0.001). In sum, females under 10 years of age have significantly higher values than males. The angle values decreased until the age of 11-15 years of age when there were no significant gender differences. Thus, the males aged over 16 years old presented significantly higher values than the females. The decrease in gonial angle values seems to slow or stop from 21 years onwards. Knowledge of the pattern differences will serve for age and gender determination when analyzing human remains.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Gender; Gonial angle; Mandible; Quantitative anatomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28954210     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  4 in total

1.  Magnitude of Gonial Angle Influence on the Commonness of Mandibular Angle Fractures.

Authors:  Preeti Tiwari; Rathindra Nath Bera; Nishtha Chauhan
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

2.  Comparison of the Gonial Angle With Age and Gender Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images.

Authors:  Ayşe Bakan; Piraye Kervancıoğlu; İlhan Bahşi; Eda Didem Yalçın
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-14

3.  Influence of tooth loss on mandibular morphology: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Shaimaa-Mohamed Fouda; Mohammed M Gad; Maha El Tantawi; Jorma I Virtanen; Kirsi Sipila; Aune Raustia
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-09-01

4.  Gonial Angle by Lateral Cephalogram in Orthodontic Patients of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Manju Bajracharya; Anjana Rajbhandari; Resina Pradhan; Pushkar Manandhar; Surendra Maharjan; Bashu Dev Pant
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 0.406

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.