Jackie Robinson1,2, Merryn Gott1, Rosemary Frey1, Clare Gardiner1, Christine Ingleton3. 1. 1 School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. 2 Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. 3 The School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research exploring patient experience of palliative care in the hospital setting has previously been limited to negative aspects of care. However, recent studies have shown that patients with palliative care needs experience benefits being in hospital. Little is known about how experiences of benefit and burden vary according to socio-demographic and illness-related factors and how these experiences influence patient preferences to return to hospital. AIM: To identify factors influencing experiences of benefit and burden and the predictors associated with a preference to return to hospital in palliative care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design using a questionnaire survey. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In total, 116 hospital inpatients admitted with palliative care needs in an urban hospital in New Zealand. Recruitment was from an oncology ward, four general medical wards and a respiratory ward. RESULTS: Those living in more deprived areas experienced more benefit being in hospital ( F(4, 109) = 3.15, p = 0.017), while younger people ( F(4, 109) = 4.44, p = 0.00) and those from Asian or Pacific cultures ( F(2, 111) = 7.78, p = 0.000) experienced more burden. Those with a non-cancer diagnosis felt less safe in hospital ( p = 0.04). 'Feeling safe' was a significant ( B = 0.14, p = 0.03) predictor for a preference to return to hospital. CONCLUSION: Deprivation, diagnosis, age and ethnicity influenced experiences of benefit and burden in hospital. 'Feeling safe' was a significant predictor for a preference to return to hospital. Further research is needed to understand why certain patient factors influence experiences of hospitalisation and how 'feeling safe' can be replicated in other care environments.
BACKGROUND: Research exploring patient experience of palliative care in the hospital setting has previously been limited to negative aspects of care. However, recent studies have shown that patients with palliative care needs experience benefits being in hospital. Little is known about how experiences of benefit and burden vary according to socio-demographic and illness-related factors and how these experiences influence patient preferences to return to hospital. AIM: To identify factors influencing experiences of benefit and burden and the predictors associated with a preference to return to hospital in palliative care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design using a questionnaire survey. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In total, 116 hospital inpatients admitted with palliative care needs in an urban hospital in New Zealand. Recruitment was from an oncology ward, four general medical wards and a respiratory ward. RESULTS: Those living in more deprived areas experienced more benefit being in hospital ( F(4, 109) = 3.15, p = 0.017), while younger people ( F(4, 109) = 4.44, p = 0.00) and those from Asian or Pacific cultures ( F(2, 111) = 7.78, p = 0.000) experienced more burden. Those with a non-cancer diagnosis felt less safe in hospital ( p = 0.04). 'Feeling safe' was a significant ( B = 0.14, p = 0.03) predictor for a preference to return to hospital. CONCLUSION: Deprivation, diagnosis, age and ethnicity influenced experiences of benefit and burden in hospital. 'Feeling safe' was a significant predictor for a preference to return to hospital. Further research is needed to understand why certain patient factors influence experiences of hospitalisation and how 'feeling safe' can be replicated in other care environments.
Authors: Katharina van Baal; Sophie Schrader; Nils Schneider; Birgitt Wiese; Jona Theodor Stahmeyer; Sveja Eberhard; Siegfried Geyer; Stephanie Stiel; Kambiz Afshar Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Tamsin McGlinchey; Stephen R Mason; Ruthmarijke Smeding; Anne Goosensen; Inmaculada Ruiz-Torreras; Dagny Faksvåg Haugen; Miša Bakan; John E Ellershaw Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 4.762