Minh D Nguyen1,2,3, Evert P Houwman1, Huiyu Yuan1, Ben J Wylie-van Eerd1, Matthijn Dekkers2, Gertjan Koster1, Johan E Ten Elshof1, Guus Rijnders1. 1. MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente , P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, The Netherlands. 2. Solmates B.V. , Drienerlolaan 5, 7522NB Enschede, The Netherlands. 3. International Training Institute for Materials Science (ITIMS), Hanoi University of Science and Technology , No. 1 Dai Co Viet Road, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam.
Abstract
Nanosheet Ca2Nb3O10 (CNOns) layers were deposited on ultralow expansion glass substrates by the Langmuir-Blodgett method to obtain preferential (001)-oriented growth of Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 (PZT) thin films using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) to enhance the ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of the films. The PLD deposition temperature and repetition frequency used for the deposition of the PZT films were found to play a key role in the precise control of the microstructure and therefore of the ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties. A film deposited at a high repetition frequency has a columnar grain structure, which helps to increase the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient (d33f). An enhanced d33f value of 356 pm V-1 was obtained for 2-μm-thick PZT films on CNOns/glass substrates. This high value is ascribed to the preferential alignment of the crystalline [001] axis normal to the substrate surface and the open columnar structure. Large displacement actuators based on such PZT films grown on CNOns/glass substrates should be useful in smart X-ray optics applications.
Nanosheet Ca2Nb3O10 (CNOns) layers were deposited on ultralow expansion glass substrates by the Langmuir-Blodgett method to obtain preferential (001)-oriented growth of Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 (PZT) thin films using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) to enhance the ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of the films. The PLD deposition temperature and repetition frequency used for the deposition of the PZT films were found to play a key role in the precise control of the microstructure and therefore of the ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties. A film deposited at a high repetition frequency has a columnar grain structure, which helps to increase the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient (d33f). An enhanced d33f value of 356 pm V-1 was obtained for 2-μm-thick PZT films on CNOns/glass substrates. This high value is ascribed to the preferential alignment of the crystalline [001] axis normal to the substrate surface and the open columnar structure. Large displacement actuators based on such PZT films grown on CNOns/glass substrates should be useful in smart X-ray optics applications.
Recently there has
been an increased demand for high performance
piezoelectric and ferroelectric thin films for sensors and actuators,
such as the transparent touch panel[1,2] and adaptive
optics for telescopes.[3] For these applications,
lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin films have received much attention
because of the strong intrinsic piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties.In a previous paper we showed that the use of Ca2Nb3O10 nanosheets (CNOns) as a seed layer is a promising
route for achieving highly (001)-oriented, textured PZT films on Si
substrates.[4] The high crystalline quality
of the PZT films can significantly improve the performance of envisaged
microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices. However, the use of
Si substrates limits the applications of PZT films for optical and
electro-optic applications because Si is not transparent.[5] Similar to Si in the semiconductor industry,
transparent glass plays a very important role in optical systems.
Especially the very low thermal expansion of ultralow expansion (ULE)
glass has made it the material of choice for X-ray optics applications,
such as lightweight mirror blanks for astronomical telescopes, interferometry
space satellite applications, and extreme UV mirrors for lithography.[6−9]There have been some studies on the fabrication and optimization
of PZT films on glass substrates. In order to fabricate dense and
uniform PZT films on such substrates, conductive metal oxide LaNiO3 (LNO) was developed as a buffer layer.[10] The application of nanosheets as a seed layer on glass
substrate has been of great interest for the orientation control of
perovskite films. Kikuta et al.[11] and Bayraktar
et al.[12] deposited highly (001)-oriented
PZT films on glass substrates, using CNOns as a buffer layer. They
reported improved ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties in these
films. However, the observed piezoelectric coefficients were much
lower (∼100 pm V–1) than those of the respective
bulk PZT ceramics (223 pm V–1),[13] which was explained by the substrate clamping of the film.[14] Recently, Bayraktar et al.[9] observed a very high piezoelectric coefficient (d33 = 250 pm V–1) in 2-μm-thick
PZT films on CNOns/ULE glass, using LaNiO3 electrodes.
This observation is of great interest for smart X-ray optics applications.The control of the microstructure and orientation of the PZT film
is very important for device performance. In film growth processes,
the microstructure of a film is usually determined by the nucleation
and initial growth phase. The former is mainly controlled by the substrate
used, such as crystallinity, surface orientation, and lattice mismatch,
while the latter is usually controlled by the process conditions.
Therefore, for the complete control of a film microstructure, it is
required to understand the effects of both substrate and processing
parameters on the nucleation and growth of the film. This eventually
will provide ways to improve the device performance. So far there
have been many studies on the effect of deposition conditions, such
as deposition temperature and deposition pressure, on the microstructure
and the ferroelectric and the piezoelectric properties of PZT films
prepared by the pulsed laser deposition (PLD) technique.[15−19] It was found that the deposition conditions play an important role
in the nucleation and formation of the perovskite phase.[20] For the deposition of PZT films, especially
on substrate materials with a low phase transition temperature (e.g.,
glass), one of the most important problems is the deposition temperature.
This temperature not only determines the initial growth of a film,
but also its subsequent growth and therefore its microstructure and
properties. The most practical MEMS device structures available today
are probably piezoelectric MEMS. However, the high process temperature
is an obstacle for integration of the MEMS device directly onto a
complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) device. A CMOS device,
especially on a glass substrate, due to its nature, can only withstand
a process temperature of at the most 500 °C. The typical crystallization/deposition
temperature of PZT films is in the range 550–600 °C for
sputtering,[21,22] and 600–650 °C for
sol-gel deposition.[23,24] With PLD a smooth film surface
can be obtained by varying the number of laser pulses per second,
keeping the amount of material deposited per shot constant.[25] In that case a lower deposition rate or a longer
growth time (a lower laser pulse repetition frequency) for a fixed
pulse intensity (laser power density) means that the nuclei have more
time to ripen, and one expects the film to evolve into a smooth surface
with large, flat areas.[17] However, there
are hardly any studies on the effect of laser pulse rate on the growth
and properties of PZT films. Guan et al.[17] used a Monte Carlo computational model to study the influence of
the pulse rate on the island density and film morphology in the early
phase of PLD growth. The computational results indicated that more
and smaller sized islands are formed at higher repetition rates, and
the reduced island size enhances the diffusion of adatoms resulting
in a smoother film surface.In this paper, we report on the
fabrication of 2-μm-thick
PZT films using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) with high longitudinal
piezo-responses on ULE glass substrates with CNOns buffer layers at
deposition temperatures as low as 450 °C. The relationship between
the deposition conditions, the microstructural properties, and the
piezoelectric properties of in situ PZT films deposited by pulsed
laser deposition was investigated. Moreover, the dependence of piezoelectric
properties on nanosheet buffer-layer and substrate-type is discussed.
Experimental Section
The concept
of growth and control of the growth direction of perovskite
layers on nanosheets was introduced by Kikuta et al.[11] and demonstrated with PLD-grown epitaxial films on CNOns
and TiOns by Nijland et al.[26] The backbone
of CNOns consists of corner-sharing NbO6 octahedra with
a (001) surface plane and a pseudocubic lattice constant of ap = 3.86 Å. TiOns consists of side-sharing
TiO6 octahedra creating a hexagonal surface plane with
in-plane lattice constants a = 3.76 Å and b = 2.97 Å, compatible with (110)-oriented growth of
perovskites. The thickness of the nanosheet is a few nanometers.
Synthesis
Nanosheets
Ca2Nb3O10 (CNOns)
and Ti0.87O2 (TiOns) nanosheets
were fabricated by exfoliation of layered protonated titanate (H1.07Ti1.73O4·H2O) and
protonated calcium niobate (HCa2Nb3O10·1.5H2O) followed by the Langmuir–Blodgett
(LB) deposition method. The details of the flux-synthesized, layered
precursor K0.8[Ti1.73Li0.27O4] and the solid state synthesized, layered precursor KCa2Nb3O10 and their protonation processes
can be found in previous reports.[27−29] The AFM images of a
monolayer CNOns on glass and Si substrates as well as on TiOns on
glass substrate, are shown in Figure S1 (Supporting Information, SI).
Pulsed Laser Deposition
Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 (PZT) thin films with a
thickness of about
2-μm (±0.05 μm) were grown on 200 nm-thickLaNiO3 (LNO) electrode buffered glass, CNOns/glass, TiOns/glass,
and CNOns/Si substrates with pulsed laser deposition (PLD) using a
KrF excimer laser source (Lambda Physik, 248 nm wavelength). The deposition
conditions of the PZT films were laser repetition frequency 10–50
Hz, substrate temperature 450–600 °C, energy density 2.5
J cm–2, and oxygen pressure 0.1 mbar. The deposition
conditions were 4 Hz, 600 °C, 2.5 J cm–2, and
0.1 mbar O2 for the LNO electrodes. In the study of the
effect of deposition temperature on the properties of PZT films, the
LNO electrode was deposited at the same temperature as the PZT film.
All layers were deposited successively without breaking the vacuum.
After deposition, the films were cooled down to room temperature in
a 1 bar oxygen atmosphere at a ramp rate of 8 °C minute–1.
Analysis and Characterization
The crystal structure
of the thin films was analyzed by X-ray diffraction θ–2θ
and omega scans (XRD, Philips X’Pert X–ray diffractometer).
The surface morphology and microstructure were analyzed using atomic
force microscopy (AFM: Bruker Dimension Icon), high-resolution scanning
electron microscopy (HRSEM: Zeiss–1550), and high-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Philips CM300ST–FEG).
For electrical measurements, the samples with 200 nm-thickLNO top-electrodes
were used. 300 × 300 μm2 capacitors were patterned
by a standard photolithography process and structured by argon-beam
etching of the top-electrodes and wet-etching (HF-HCl solution) of the PZT films (see Figure S2). The polarization hysteresis (P–E) loop
measurements were performed with the ferroelectric mode of the aixACCT
TF-2000 Analyzer using a triangular ac-electric field
of ±200 kV cm–1 at 1 kHz scanning frequency.
The effective piezoelectric small-signal coefficient (d33f) and large-signal strain (S) of the
piezoelectric thin-film capacitors was measured using a double-beam
laser interferometer (aixDBLI) method with a minimum resolution of
0.2 pm. The d33f values were obtained
from d33f–E loops
measured at increasing cycling intervals at ±200 kV cm–1 and 1 kHz frequency.
Results and Discussion
Effect of Deposition Conditions
Two series of samples
were fabricated with the aim to modify the microstructure of the PZT
films grown on CNOns/glass substrates by varying respectively the
PLD deposition temperature at constant PLD laser pulse frequency (Td = 450, 520, 560, and 600 °C and at 50
Hz) and by varying the laser pulse rate at constant deposition temperature
(10, 25, and 50 Hz and with Td = 600 °C).
Notable differences in columnar grain growth and film quality were
observed, resulting in changes in the polarization and especially
the effective, longitudinal piezoelectric constant (d33f) of PZT thin film capacitors.Figure a shows
the XRD θ–2θ patterns of films deposited at 50
Hz and different substrate temperatures and Figure b that of films deposited at 600 °C
and varying laser pulse frequency. All PZT films are predominantly
(001)-oriented with only minor fractions of (110) and (111) orientations.
Note that PZT films with only perovskite phases are obtained even
at a deposition temperature as low as 450 °C. This is significantly
lower than process temperatures reported in other studies[15,30,31] and represents an important advantage
for the integration with CMOS devices. The (002) reflection peak of
the PZT films was further examined with an X-ray ω-scan (rocking
curve), as shown in Figure S3 (SI). The full-width-at-half-maximum (fwhm) values
of the PZT films increases only slightly with increasing deposition
frequency from 0.52° to 0.67° for 10 and 50 Hz, respectively,
and slightly more for deposition temperature decreasing from 600 °C
(values in Table ).
Only for the lowest Td = 450 °C does
the fwhm increase somewhat more to 1.08°. A lower fwhm value
corresponds to a higher quality PZT film, implying that the grains
are more aligned.
Figure 1
XRD θ–2θ
scans of 2-μm-thick PZT films
grown on LNO/CNOns/glass: (a) Td of 450,
520, 560, and 600 °C and at 50 Hz and (b) 10, 25, and 50 Hz and
with Td of 600 °C.
Table 1
Properties of PZT Films on Glass,
Si, and STO Substrates with CNO and TiO Nanosheets
Average root-mean-square roughness
(Rrms), determined from AFM images in
an average over area of 10 × 10 μm2.
Deposition rate (Rav).
Average grain
size (dcol), determined from SEM cross-section.
Average volume void fraction
and
average grain spacing calculated as in ref (34) from the measured Rav data, assuming that the (10 Hz, 600 °C)-film is 100% dense.
On top of nanosheet.
Film is assumed to be 100% dense.
Estimated from the average deposition
rate and the average grain diameter, following the procedure described
in ref (34).
XRD θ–2θ
scans of 2-μm-thick PZT films
grown on LNO/CNOns/glass: (a) Td of 450,
520, 560, and 600 °C and at 50 Hz and (b) 10, 25, and 50 Hz and
with Td of 600 °C.Average root-mean-square roughness
(Rrms), determined from AFM images in
an average over area of 10 × 10 μm2.Deposition rate (Rav).Average grain
size (dcol), determined from SEM cross-section.Average volume void fraction
and
average grain spacing calculated as in ref (34) from the measured Rav data, assuming that the (10 Hz, 600 °C)-film is 100% dense.On top of nanosheet.Film is assumed to be 100% dense.Estimated from the average deposition
rate and the average grain diameter, following the procedure described
in ref (34).The film morphology and structure were investigated by AFM
and
cross-sectional SEM as shown in Figure . First we discuss the frequency dependence. The film
deposited at 600 °C and 10 Hz shows a very dense, structure free
film on top of the nanosheets, which is extremely flat. It was shown
previously that the observed polycrystalline columnar structure formed
along lines arises from the edges of the nanosheets. The average column
diameter range from 20 to 30 nm at the bottom to a few 100 nm at the
top of the 2-μm-thick film. This structure was ascribed to a
different nucleation density and growth at the edges of the nanosheets
and the in-plane orientation mismatch of the single crystals grown
on top of neighboring nanosheets. The same mechanism was also observed
in the PZT films grown on the CNO nanosheets buffered Si substrates,
in which the columnar growth was formed on parts of the Si substrate
that are not covered by CNO nanosheets.[4] For higher laser frequencies, the structure of the film is columnar
(Figure b,c). The
fine columnar structure on the nanosheet is very similar to the columnar
structure off the nanosheets, which makes it impossible to distinguish
the two orientations from the SEM images. However, the XRD measurements
show approximately the same ratio of (001) and non (001)-oriented
growths, suggesting that on the nanosheets the growth is still (001)-oriented.
The change from the dense structure to the columnar structure on the
nanosheets is attributed to a drastic increase in the nucleation density
with increasing laser frequency, due to strongly reduced diffusion
time for particles arriving on the film surface. This structural change
also has a large effect on the surface roughness. It is only 0.7 nm
on top of the nanosheet for the film deposited at 10 Hz and 600 °C.
It is only due to the columnar growth at the nanosheet edges that
the average root-mean-square roughness (Rrms) is fairly large (27 nm, see also Table ). The Rrms rapidly
increases from 19 to 32 nm for the (25 Hz, 600 °C)-film and (50
Hz, 600 °C)-film, respectively. The increased roughness correlates
with the larger average columnar grain diameter (dcol), which translates into a higher pyramidal-shape at
the top of the layer and thus larger Rrms.
Figure 2
Surface morphology AFM and cross-sectional SEM images
of 2-μm-thick
PZT films deposited on LNO/CNOns/glass: (a–c) varying laser
frequency and with Td = 600 °C, (d–g)
that same for varying deposition temperature (Td) and at 50 Hz laser frequency.
Surface morphology AFM and cross-sectional SEM images
of 2-μm-thick
PZT films deposited on LNO/CNOns/glass: (a–c) varying laser
frequency and with Td = 600 °C, (d–g)
that same for varying deposition temperature (Td) and at 50 Hz laser frequency.Figure d–g
shows the surface morphology and structure of films deposited at 50
Hz but at different deposition temperature (Td). With decreasing Td the average
grain diameter decreases gradually from 174 nm for the (50 Hz, 600
°C)-film to 63 nm for the (50 Hz, 450 °C)-film. The decreasing
column width with decreasing deposition temperature indicates a decreasing
lateral growth rate, due to lower surface mobility after the nucleation
phase. The surface roughness suddenly decreases from about 32 nm to
about 20 nm, when Td is decreased from
600 °C to a lower T (50 Hz, 560–450 °C)-film. On close examination of the
SEM graphs of the top of the grains one can observe a distinct difference
between these and the (50 Hz, 560–450 °C)-films. The top
of the columns of all films have a pyramidal shape, but the pyramid
side surfaces are covered with many small crystallites, smoothing
out the sharp features of the pyramidal structure for the latter films.
This seems to be the main cause for the sudden reduction in surface
roughness with decreasing Td between 600
and 560 °C. Thus, in this temperature interval the nucleation
density on the pyramidal side faces is strongly increased, ascribed
to the reduced diffusion length in the short time (20 ms) in between
laser pulses at these lower temperatures. The cross-sectional TEM
image of the PZT film deposited at 10 Hz (Figure a), shows the compact grain or “dense”
microstructure in the film on the CNOns and the columnar grain on
the CNOns edges and in the uncovered glass areas in between the nanosheets.
The cross-sectional TEM image of PZT film deposited at 50 Hz also
shows the separated columnar microstructure (Figure b).
Figure 3
Cross-sectional TEM images of the 2-μm-thick
PZT films grown
at (a) 10 Hz and (b) 50 Hz, on LNO/CNO/glass substrates. (C)–(H)
SAED patterns taken from the corresponding positions in (a) and (b),
respectively.
Cross-sectional TEM images of the 2-μm-thick
PZT films grown
at (a) 10 Hz and (b) 50 Hz, on LNO/CNO/glass substrates. (C)–(H)
SAED patterns taken from the corresponding positions in (a) and (b),
respectively.In a previous paper we
described that the columnar grains in films
grown along the CNOns edges and in the uncovered Si substrate areas
have (110) orientation.[4] Therefore, we
assume that also in the present case of PZT growth on CNOns on glass,
the minor (110)-oriented fraction is due to the growth on the bare
glass substrate and along the CNOns edges. In order to verify the
origin of the (110) orientation, selected area electron diffraction
(SAED) was used. Figure (C–E) are the SAED patterns taken from the corresponding positions
in the film deposited at 10 Hz, shown in the cross-sectional TEM image Figure a. The SAED patterns
at the positions C and D correspond to a (110) in-plane direction
therefore the growth at these positions is in the [001] direction.
In contrast, the SAED of the columnar grains growing at the edge of
the nanosheets (position E) have a (100) in-plane orientation, thus
the grain growth is in the [110] direction. Although the columnar
grains with (110) growth orientation in the gap between nanosheets
are also formed in the films deposited at 50 Hz, these (110) grains
are difficult to recognize because the microstructure is very similar
to that on the nanosheets with (001) orientation. Figure (F–H) show the SAED
patterns at three positions in a single column on a nanosheet, showing
that the growth direction of this column is along [001].To
investigate the effect of the repetition laser frequency and
deposition temperature Td on the ferroelectric
and piezoelectric properties of PZT films, the P–E and d33f −E hysteresis loops were measured, as shown in Figure . The polarization loops for films deposited
at 600 °C slightly change by increasing the laser frequency (Figure a). The remanent
polarization (Pr) of the films deposited
at different repetition frequency iesare nearly equal (Table ), but the slope of the hysteresis
loop for increasing applied field increases with decreasing deposition
frequency. We think that the value of the remanent polarization and
this change in slope are related to a gradual change in the clamping
of the grains with laser frequency, but a detailed model that accounts
for polarization rotation and extension in relation to more or less
clamping to substantiate this is still lacking.
Figure 4
Ferroelectric polarization (P–E) and piezoelectric
(d33f–E) hysteresis
loops of 2-μm-thick PZT films deposited on LNO/CNOns/glass (a,b)
at varying laser frequency and with Td = 600 °C, and (c,d) the same for varying deposition temperature
(Td) and at 50 Hz laser frequency.
Ferroelectric polarization (P–E) and piezoelectric
(d33f–E) hysteresis
loops of 2-μm-thick PZT films deposited on LNO/CNOns/glass (a,b)
at varying laser frequency and with Td = 600 °C, and (c,d) the same for varying deposition temperature
(Td) and at 50 Hz laser frequency.The d33f values increase with repetition
frequency (Figure b), which was previously ascribed to increased declamping of the
columns in the film deposited at high repetition frequency. The large d33f values are ascribed to a combination of
the intrinsic effect and the extrinsic contribution due to domain
switching and polarization rotation. Both intrinsic and extrinsic
effects become larger with decreased clamping.[32]Applying the same analysis as
discussed in ref (32), it is found that with
higher laser frequency the film becomes less dense and the columnar
grains become more separated. From the measured deposition rate per
pulse and the column diameter it is estimated that the average void
fraction in the film increases from close to 0% for the 10 Hz-film
to 23% for the 50 Hz film, while the average separation between grains
increases from 0 to 27 nm (Table ). Consequently the clamping of the PZT grains is strongly
reduced, and the grains may to a large extend be considered as unclamped
single crystals. The maximum piezoelectric coefficient is even larger
than the theoretical value for a single domain, single crystal (327
pm V–1, Haun et al.).[33] The increased value is ascribed to the extrinsic effect of domain
wall motion between different polarization domains. This is supported
by phase field simulations that have shown that by that mechanism d33f values up to 600 pm V–1 may be possible in unclamped, single crystal PZT with (near-) MPB
compositions.[34]Figure b also indicates
that for increasing field d33f rapidly
decreases, which in terms of the above explanation implies that the
contribution of domain switching and polarization rotation decreases
and that the relative contribution of the intrinsic piezoelectric
effect becomes larger. Therefore, the d33f value reaches a peak in the low electric field region and gradually
decreases as the higher electric field is applied.Ferroelectric
and piezoelectric properties of PZT thin films have
been achieved even at a deposition temperature as low as 450 °C
(Figure c,d). The
polarization decreases with decreasing Td, but only for the lowest deposition temperature is the remanent
polarization decreased significantly (Pr is reduced from about 28 to 19 μC cm–2)
and the loop has become much more slanted. The effect of decreasing Td on the piezoelectric properties is much stronger:
the maximum d33f value decreases from
356 pm V–1 at Td = 600
°C to 200 pm V–1 at Td = 450 °C. We attribute both trends to the change in
crystallinity and microstructure with decreasing deposition temperature.
Although the void fraction does not change significantly with deposition
temperature, the average grain diameter does, and with that the average
separation between the grains, which monotonically decreases from
about 27 to 7 nm for Td falling from 600
to 450 °C. With decreasing grain separation one may expect that
the grains are increasingly connected and then the clamping increases.
In general clamping reduces domain wall motion and consequently the
extrinsic piezoelectric effect related to domain wall motion, leading
to a decrease in the piezoelectric properties. The decrease in the
(remanent) polarization at low Td might
be due to the degradation of crystallinity (reflected in an increase
of the fwhm with decreasing Td), decreasing
the amount of switchable polarization. For optical applications, the
static piezoelectric displacement of PZT film capacitors is very important. Figure a shows the displacement
profile of a 2 μm PZT thin film capacitor deposited on CNOns/glass
at 50 Hz and 600 °C, measured at an applied DC voltage of 10
V, measured with optical white-light interferometry (WLI) . This is
very similar to the way such a device may be used in deformable mirrors
to control the wavefront in optical systems. The displacement profile
along the trace indicated in Figure a is shown in Figure b. The average piezoelectric coefficient over the 0–10
V voltage range (this corresponds to 0–50 kV cm–1 applied electric field) is about 440 pm V–1.
Figure 5
(a) White
light interferometer (WLI) measurement and (b) height
profile of piezoelectric displacement, of a 2-μm-thick PZT film
grown on LNO/CNOns/glass at 50 Hz and 600 °C, measured under
a dc-voltage of 10 V.
(a) White
light interferometer (WLI) measurement and (b) height
profile of piezoelectric displacement, of a 2-μm-thick PZT film
grown on LNO/CNOns/glass at 50 Hz and 600 °C, measured under
a dc-voltage of 10 V.The strain response of the films was investigated as a function
of laser pulse rate. Figure S4 shows the
bipolar and unipolar large-signal strain-field hysteresis loops (S–E) for the PZT films grown on CNOns/glass at 600
°C deposition temperature and varying laser frequencies, using
a cycle frequency of 1 kHz. Typical butterfly shaped bipolar strain
loops are observed. The hysteresis indicates the importance of ferroelectric
domain switching and domain wall motion.[32] (This is also reflected by the jump to zero strain at E = 0 kV cm–1 in the raising branch of the loop.
At this point there is a waiting time in the measurement protocol,
before the next cycle is started. During this waiting time the strain
is relaxed at constant applied field by continuing domain wall motion.)
The strain increases with laser frequency and a maximum strain of
about 0.78%, at a driving field of +200 kV cm–1 is
obtained for the (50 Hz, 600 °C) film. With increasing strain
the slope of the S–E curve decreases, hence
the piezoelectric coefficient d33S(E) = (dS/dE) implies a decreasing piezoelectric effect at high
fields. The average piezoelectric strain coefficient (d33S = ΔS/ΔE)) was calculated from the bipolar S–E curve
(Figure S4a inset). Table S1 gives the differences in the piezoelectric coefficients
measured under the different driving conditions. For the film deposited
at 10 Hz, d33f (0 kV cm–1), determined from the small-signal or dc-bias d33f–E hysteresis loop,
is about 35% smaller than the large signal value d33S determined from the S–E loop. This difference is even 44% for the films deposited
at 25 and 50 Hz. Such a (large) difference was also reported by Berfield
et al.[23] and attributed to a combination
of the active mechanisms that contribute to the piezoelectric response
and the way to determine d33 for the different
driving cases. For the small-signal piezoelectric (d33f–E) measurement, a low ac-field of 2 kV cm–1 was applied so that
the sample response is linear, but the piezoelectric strain (S–E) measurement was performed under an ac-electric field with an amplitude well above the coercive field of
the films. The higher extrinsic contribution from domain wall movement
and/or electric-field induced domain switching to the response of
strain is thought to be the origin of the much higher d33S values determined from the S–E curves than the values from the d33f–E loops.[35] However,
there is some variation in the slope at E = 0 of
the S–E curves for different maximum applied ac fields, and this may affect the calculated d33 value.[23] Therefore, the
small-signal effective piezoelectric coefficient (d33f) value has been used to compare the piezoelectric
properties of PZT grown on different substrates. For actuator applications
the maximum achievable strain Smax at
maximum applied electric field Emax is
the quantity of interest and their ratio Smax/Emax the key figure of merit. Therefore,
also the unipolar strain loops of PZT films deposited at different
repetition frequencies as a function of unipolar electric field are
shown in Figure S4b. The films have a relatively
low strain hysteresis (H) of about 6.9–7.5%
that slightly decreases above a laser frequency of 25 Hz. Strain hysteresis
(related to the piezoelectric loss) was evaluated from the fraction
of strain at half-maximum field (see inset in Figure S4b).[36] The high piezoelectric
strain and low strain hysteresis obtained in this study expand the
possibilities for the application of such PZT films in actuator systems.
Effect of Nanosheet Seed Layers
To demonstrate the
advantageous effect of a seed layer of nanosheets on the crystalline
and electrical properties of PZT films we compared the properties
of 2-μm-thick PZT film deposited at a laser frequency of 50
Hz and 600 °C deposition temperature, directly on LNO/glass and
LNO/Ti0.87O2 nanosheets on glass (LNO/TiOns/glass)
with similar films using LNO/CNOns/glass.Figure shows
the
XRD θ–2θ patterns for 2-μm-thick PZT films
deposited on LNO/glass, LNO/TiOns/glass, and LNO/CNOns/glass substrates.
A predominant (110) orientation (with a minor fraction with (001)
orientation) is found for the PZT film on TiOns/glass, while a random
orientation is observed for the PZT film deposited on LNO/glass directly.
These results indicate that CNOns and TiOns can be utilized to control
the orientation of perovskite compounds on glass substrates. The low
crystalline quality of the random-oriented PZT film directly grown
on glass can also be seen from the large fwhm value of the rocking
curve peak (Table ). The average diameter of the columnar grains in this film is about
192 nm. Note that the columnar grains do not extend from the bottom
to the top of the film (Figure b) as is the case for the PZT films on LNO/CNOns/glass. In
a previous study we have shown that PZT films can be grown on Ti0.87O2 nanosheet buffered Si (TiOns/Si) substrates
with a columnar structure.[4] Similar to
the film grown on TiOns/Si, the film grown on TiOns/glass in this
study also has a columnar structure (but more dense and finer than
in the case of growth on CNOns/glass) with continuous grains from
the bottom electrode to the top of the layer (Figure d). The average grain size of about 90 nm
in the PZT film on TiOns/glass is much smaller than that on CNOns/glass
(174 nm). More information on the grain size and surface roughness
of these films is given in Table .
Figure 6
XRD θ–2θ
patterns of 2-μm-thick PZT films
deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered (a) glass, (b)
TiOns/glass, and (c) CNOns/glass.
Figure 7
AFM and cross-sectional SEM images of PZT films deposited
(at 50
Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered (a,b) glass, (c,d) TiOns/glass,
and (e,f) CNOns/glass.
XRD θ–2θ
patterns of 2-μm-thick PZT films
deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered (a) glass, (b)
TiOns/glass, and (c) CNOns/glass.AFM and cross-sectional SEM images of PZT films deposited
(at 50
Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered (a,b) glass, (c,d) TiOns/glass,
and (e,f) CNOns/glass.Figure compares
the polarization and piezoelectric properties of PZT films deposited
on LNO buffered glass, TiOns/glass, and CNOns/glass at 50 Hz and 600
°C. The d33f value of PZT film on
TiOns/glass (215 pm V–1) is also much lower than
that on CNOns/glass (356 pm V–1). It indicates that
not only the columnar structure but also the film orientation affect
the piezoelectric coefficient. In this case, when an external electric
field is applied along the [001] direction, i.e., perpendicular to
the film surface, a large strain is achieved due to extensive non-180°
domain switching,[37] and therefore a higher d33f value is obtained in the (001)-oriented
PZT film. The (001)-oriented PZT film has also a larger remanent polarization
because the spontaneous polarization is along the [001] crystallographic
direction, as shown in Figure a and Table . Moreover, the low void fraction and thus the strong effect of clamping
is also a reason in the low d33f value
in PZT film on TiOns/glass.
Figure 8
(a) P–E and (b) small-signal d33f–E hysteresis loops,
of 2-μm-thick
PZT films deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered glass,
TiOns/glass, and CNOns/glass.
(a) P–E and (b) small-signal d33f–E hysteresis loops,
of 2-μm-thick
PZT films deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered glass,
TiOns/glass, and CNOns/glass.
Effect of Substrate Types
To investigate the effect
of substrates on the piezoelectric properties, the 2-μm-thick
PZT films with (001) orientation are deposited at 50 Hz and 600 °C
on LNO/CNOns/glass, LNO/CNOns/Si, and LNO/SrTiO3 (STO(001)) substrates. The expected (001) orientation with
minor (110) orientation is observed in the PZT films on CNOns/glass
and CNOns/Si, while the film on STO is only (001) oriented, as shown
in Figure . The fwhm
value of the PZT(002) rocking curve in the film on CNOns/Si is approximately
equal to that of the film on CNOns/glass, while a smaller fwhm value
is obtained for the film on STO due to good lattice match and highly
in-plane orientation (Table ).
Figure 9
XRD θ–2θ patterns of 2-μm-thick PZT films
deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered (a) SrTiO3 (STO, 001), (b) CNOns/Si, and (c) CNOns/glass.
XRD θ–2θ patterns of 2-μm-thick PZT films
deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered (a) SrTiO3 (STO, 001), (b) CNOns/Si, and (c) CNOns/glass.The columnar growth in these films is illustrated
in Figure , in which
the
columnar-grain sizes are about 174, 110, and 192 nm, respectively,
for the films on CNOns/glass, CNOns/Si, and STO. It is interesting
to note that the columnar growth is also obtained in the film on single-crystal
STO substrate at high laser frequency (50 Hz) although the average
columnar grain size is much larger than in the films on CNOns/glass
and CNOns/Si. Also the surface of the film on STO becomes much rougher,
reflecting the larger dcol. More details
on the grain size and surface roughness are given in Table .
Figure 10
AFM and cross-sectional SEM images of 2-μm-thick
PZT films
deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered (a,b) STO, (c,d)
CNOns/Si, and (e,f) CNOns/glass.
AFM and cross-sectional SEM images of 2-μm-thick
PZT films
deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered (a,b) STO, (c,d)
CNOns/Si, and (e,f) CNOns/glass.The P–E loops in Figure a for the films
grown on CNOns/glass and CNOns/Si are very much comparable (although
the CNOns/Si device has a slightly larger polarization), but a much
higher polarization is observed in the film on STO. We attribute this
to the difference in thermal expansion coefficients (TEC) of the substrates,
inducing less in-plane tensile strain in PZT on CNOns/Si than that
on CNOns/glass, while there is the in-plane compressive strain in
PZT on STO, causing increasing polarization out of the film plane
(TEC of PZT is 6.0 ppm K–1,[38−40] Si ≈
4.4 ppm K–1,[41] ULE glass
≈ 0 ppm K–1,[42] and STO ≈ 11.0 ppm K–1.[43]).
Figure 11
(a) P–E and (b) small-signal d33f–E hysteresis loops,
of 2-μm-thick
PZT films deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered STO,
CNOns/Si, and CNOns/glass substrates.
(a) P–E and (b) small-signal d33f–E hysteresis loops,
of 2-μm-thick
PZT films deposited (at 50 Hz and 600 °C) on LNO buffered STO,
CNOns/Si, and CNOns/glass substrates.Figure b shows
the piezoelectric d33f–E loops of PZT/LNO films on CNOns/glass, CNOns/Si, and STO substrates.
It was found that the larger d33f value
of the PZT film on CNOns/glass than those on CNOns/Si and STO. For
these relatively thin films a large fraction of the clamping is due
to the substrate, that is expected to be proportional to the Young’s
modulus (Ys) of the substrate (Ys = 238 GPa for STO substrate,[44] which is much higher than that of Si (Ys = 150 GPa)[45] and glass (Ys = 67.6 GPa)[42] substrates).
Thus, one may expect with decreasing Ys the effective piezoelectric coefficient of the film increases, as
is observed.In the above, we have interpreted
the trends in the piezoelectric
coefficient (and polarization) in terms of changes in the clamping
of the grains in the different films. We have assumed that this clamping
decreases with increasing (average) grain separation and decreasing
stiffness of the substrate. In Figure , the d33f value
is plotted versus the ratio δ/Ys, where δ is the estimated spacing between the grains in the
phyllo and Ys is the Young’s modulus
of the substrate.[46] The graph shows a clear
positive correlation between δ/Ys and d33f, which holds for these 2-μm-thick
PZT films grown on nanosheets buffered different substrates and deposited
at different temperatures at 50 Hz deposition frequency, thus with
(predominantly) highly oriented growth. The dependence of d33f of films deposited with varying pulse rate
is much weaker but shows the same trend. A clear exception is the
film grown directly on glass, which is polycrystalline with different
growth orientations. No correlation was found between grain diameter
and d33f (see Figure S5). These results support the assumption that clamping between
grains and with the substrate determines to a large extent the extrinsic
contribution to the piezoelectric coefficient.
Figure 12
Effective piezoelectric
coefficient as a function of the ratio
of the grain spacing (δ) in the film and the Young’s
modulus (Ys) of the substrate.
Effective piezoelectric
coefficient as a function of the ratio
of the grain spacing (δ) in the film and the Young’s
modulus (Ys) of the substrate.
Conclusions
In summary, 2-μm-thick
(001)-oriented PZT films with large
piezoelectric coefficients were fabricated on glass using CNOns as
a seed layer. Films with highly vertically aligned, largely separated
columns resulted from using a laser frequency of 50 Hz. Well-developed
polarization and piezoelectric hysteresis loops were obtained down
to temperatures as low as 450 °C and represents an important
advantage for the integration with CMOS devices. The enhanced piezoelectricity
of these PZT films was explained in terms of the columnar microstructure
that allows for a reduced clamping of the film. The small differences
with films grown on ns-buffered Si and STO substrates were attributed
to differences in thermal expansion coefficients of the substrates.
These films on glass (and Si) with very high piezoelectric coefficient
may be used in a wide range of applications, including adjustable
X-ray or EUV optics.
Authors: Huiyu Yuan; Roy Lubbers; Rogier Besselink; Maarten Nijland; Johan E Ten Elshof Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Minh D Nguyen; Huiyu Yuan; Evert P Houwman; Matthijn Dekkers; Gertjan Koster; Johan E Ten Elshof; Guus Rijnders Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2016-11-02 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Maarten Nijland; Suresh Kumar; Roy Lubbers; Dave H A Blank; Guus Rijnders; Gertjan Koster; Johan E ten Elshof Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Huiyu Yuan; Minh Nguyen; Tom Hammer; Gertjan Koster; Guus Rijnders; Johan E ten Elshof Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Philip Lucke; Mohammadreza Nematollahi; Muharrem Bayraktar; Andrey E Yakshin; Johan E Ten Elshof; Fred Bijkerk Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2022-06-17