| Literature DB >> 28951727 |
Shaoping Su1, Dahua Yu1, Jiadong Cheng2,3, Yajing Chen1, Xiaohua Zhang1, Yanyan Guan2,3, Yangding Li4, Yanzhi Bi2,3, Ting Xue1, Xiaoqi Lu1, Kai Yuan1,2,3.
Abstract
Previous electroencephalogram (EEG) studies revealed reduced spectral power during the resting state in smokers. However, few studies investigated the changes of global brain networks during the resting state in young smokers by EEG. In the present study, we used minimum spanning tree (MST) to assess the differences of global network efficiency between young smoker (n = 20) and nonsmokers (n = 20). Compared with healthy nonsmokers, young smokers showed decreased leaf fraction, kappa value, increased diameter and eccentricity value in alpha band (r = 0.574, p = 0.008), which suggested the global network efficiency was decreased in young smokers. We also found positive correlation between leaf fraction and onset time of smoking in smokers. These results provided more scientific evidence of the abnormal neural oscillations of young smokers and improved our understanding of smoking addiction.Entities:
Keywords: electroencephalogram (EEG); leaf fraction; minimum spanning tree (MST); resting state; smoking
Year: 2017 PMID: 28951727 PMCID: PMC5599785 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Demographic characteristics of young smokers and nonsmokers.
| Age | 20.29 ± 1.1 | 20.95 ± 1.2 | 1.70 | |
| Education (years) | 14.38 ± 0.9 | 14.10 ± 0.8 | 0.13 | |
| Smoking duration (years) | 4.24 ± 1.8 | |||
| Cigarettes per day | 14.05 ± 3.9 | |||
| Pack-years | 3.00 ± 1.8 | |||
| Onset time (age) | 15.30 ± 1.8 | |||
| FTND total score | 4.60 ± 1.5 | |||
| CO ppm | 2.52 ± 0.9 | 8.20 ± 2.8 |
Values are expressed as means ± standard deviations.
Pack-years: smoking years × Daily consumption/20.
FTND: Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence.
Figure 1An overview of the steps. First, artifact-free epochs are filtered for each frequency band (A). Secondly, the functional connectivity matrix based on Phase lag index (PLI) is calculated for each frequency band and epoch (B). Finally, using MST construct global networks and the tree view shows the hierarchical structure of the graph (C).
PLI average and MST measures.
| Delta | PLI | 0.325 | 0.089 | 0.339 | 0.073 | −0.147 | 0.595 |
| Degree | 0.272 | 0.055 | 0.307 | 0.072 | 0.533 | 0.092 | |
| Eccentricity | 0.126 | 0.013 | 0.122 | 0.016 | 0.050 | 0.471 | |
| BC | 0.767 | 0.047 | 0.792 | 0.037 | 0.197 | 0.079 | |
| Kappa | 5.631 | 1.172 | 6.424 | 1.665 | 0.685 | 0.092 | |
| Diameter | 0.161 | 0.017 | 0.156 | 0.021 | −0.255 | 0.439 | |
| Leaf fraction | 0.705 | 0.036 | 0.711 | 0.043 | 0.357 | 0.613 | |
| Tree hierarchy | 0.465 | 0.030 | 0.454 | 0.017 | 0.158 | 0.196 | |
| Theta | PLI | 0.117 | 0.012 | 0.117 | 0.014 | −0.147 | 0.884 |
| Degree | 0.230 | 0.050 | 0.223 | 0.036 | 0.533 | 0.597 | |
| Eccentricity | 0.153 | 0.013 | 0.152 | 0.009 | 0.050 | 0.961 | |
| BC | 0.722 | 0.038 | 0.719 | 0.035 | 0.197 | 0.845 | |
| Kappa | 4.744 | 0.844 | 4.586 | 0.592 | 0.685 | 0.497 | |
| Diameter | 0.195 | 0.016 | 0.196 | 0.011 | −0.255 | 0.800 | |
| Leaf fraction | 0.662 | 0.031 | 0.659 | 0.033 | 0.357 | 0.723 | |
| Tree hierarchy | 0.463 | 0.022 | 0.461 | 0.029 | 0.158 | 0.875 | |
| Alpha | PLI | 0.189 | 0.094 | 0.218 | 0.096 | −0.968 | 0.339 |
| Degree | 0.280 | 0.074 | 0.344 | 0.097 | −2.364 | 0.023 | |
| BC | 0.745 | 0.045 | 0.768 | 0.050 | −1.530 | 0.134 | |
| − | |||||||
| − | |||||||
| Tree hierarchy | 0.478 | 0.025 | 0.488 | 0.022 | −1.419 | 0.164 | |
| Beta | PLI | 0.078 | 0.013 | 0.081 | 0.014 | −0.604 | 0.549 |
| Degree | 0.227 | 0.029 | 0.258 | 0.065 | −2.020 | 0.051 | |
| Eccentricity | 0.147 | 0.010 | 0.145 | 0.014 | 0.490 | 0.627 | |
| BC | 0.732 | 0.030 | 0.741 | 0.041 | −0.786 | 0.437 | |
| Kappa | 4.690 | 0.563 | 5.342 | 1.353 | −2.024 | 0.050 | |
| Diameter | 0.188 | 0.014 | 0.187 | 0.018 | 0.266 | 0.791 | |
| Leaf fraction | 0.671 | 0.028 | 0.680 | 0.036 | −0.909 | 0.369 | |
| Tree hierarchy | 0.462 | 0.027 | 0.463 | 0.019 | −0.099 | 0.922 | |
PLI, Phase lag index.
BC, Betweenness centrality.
Bold indicates significant difference, p < 0.05.
Figure 2MST matrices and MST graph in scalp view and tree view for the alpha band for nonsmoker and smoker. For illustrative the MST method was difference brain networks in smoker compare with nonsmoker.
Figure 3Group averages for leaf fraction, eccentricity, diameter and kappa measures of the MST. Open bars refer to nonsmoker and filled bars to young smoker (*p < 0.05).
Figure 4Significant correlation was found between leaf fraction and onset times in young smoker (r = 0.574, p = 0.008).