Banaz Al-Khalidi1, Michael A Rotondi2, Samantha M Kimball3, Chris I Ardern2. 1. School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: khalidib@yorku.ca. 2. School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Pure North S'Energy Foundation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the clinical utility of measuring serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D [25(OH)D] along with traditional risk factors in the diagnosis of insulin resistance (IR) and to estimate the optimal 25(OH)D level associated with normal glucose and insulin homeostasis. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 6868 adults aged≥20years without diagnosed diabetes in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, with available standardized 25(OH)D data (2001-2010). IR was defined by the homeostatic-model-assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; ≥75th percentile, sex-specific: 3.9 in men or 3.6 in women). Using logistic regression, two risk models were developed to estimate the risk of IR: Model 1 included established risk factors, and Model 2 additionally included serum 25(OH)D. Predictiveness curves and decision-curve analysis were used to assess differences in IR detection among models. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were used to estimate the lower threshold for 25(OH)D. Results were validated in a testing sample. RESULTS: Model 2 marginally improved detection of IR: at a risk threshold of 0.2, adding 25(OH)D would identify an additional 2 to 4 cases per 1000 people. Overall, the lower 25(OH)D threshold was estimated at 60nmol/L, however, the threshold differed by ethnicity (Mexican-Americans: 54nmo/L, non-Hispanic whites: 68nmol/L, and non-Hispanic blacks: 41nmol/L). CONCLUSION: Addition of serum 25(OH)D to traditional risk factors provided small incremental improvement in detection of IR in asymptomatic adults. The optimal 25(OH)D threshold was estimated to be at least 60nmol/L, however, the threshold may differ by ethnic-background. Further research is needed to validate these results in other populations.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To assess the clinical utility of measuring serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D [25(OH)D] along with traditional risk factors in the diagnosis of insulin resistance (IR) and to estimate the optimal 25(OH)D level associated with normal glucose and insulin homeostasis. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 6868 adults aged≥20years without diagnosed diabetes in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, with available standardized 25(OH)D data (2001-2010). IR was defined by the homeostatic-model-assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; ≥75th percentile, sex-specific: 3.9 in men or 3.6 in women). Using logistic regression, two risk models were developed to estimate the risk of IR: Model 1 included established risk factors, and Model 2 additionally included serum 25(OH)D. Predictiveness curves and decision-curve analysis were used to assess differences in IR detection among models. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were used to estimate the lower threshold for 25(OH)D. Results were validated in a testing sample. RESULTS: Model 2 marginally improved detection of IR: at a risk threshold of 0.2, adding 25(OH)D would identify an additional 2 to 4 cases per 1000 people. Overall, the lower 25(OH)D threshold was estimated at 60nmol/L, however, the threshold differed by ethnicity (Mexican-Americans: 54nmo/L, non-Hispanic whites: 68nmol/L, and non-Hispanic blacks: 41nmol/L). CONCLUSION: Addition of serum 25(OH)D to traditional risk factors provided small incremental improvement in detection of IR in asymptomatic adults. The optimal 25(OH)D threshold was estimated to be at least 60nmol/L, however, the threshold may differ by ethnic-background. Further research is needed to validate these results in other populations.