Gottfried Schmalz1, Reinhard Hickel2, Kirsten L van Landuyt3, Franz-Xaver Reichl4. 1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany. 2. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven Biomat, Leuven, Belgium. 4. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany. Electronic address: reichl@lmu.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Nanoparticles having a size from 1 to 100nm are present in nature and are successfully used in many products of daily life. Nanoparticles are also embedded per se or as byproducts from milling processes of larger filler particles in many dental materials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Recently, possible adverse effects of nanoparticles have gained increased interest with the lungs being a main target organ. Exposure to nanoparticles in dentistry may occur in the dental laboratory, by processing gypsum type products or by grinding and polishing materials. In the dental practice virtually no exposure to nanoparticles occurs when handling unset materials. However, nanoparticles are produced by intraoral adjustment of set restorative materials through grinding/polishing regardless whether they contain nanoparticles or not. Nanoparticles may also be produced through wear of restorations or released from dental implants and they enter the environment when removing restorations. The risk for dental technicians is taken care of by legal regulations. Based on model worst case mass-based calculations, the exposure of dental practice personnel and patients to nanoparticles through intraoral grinding/polishing and wear is low to negligible. Accordingly, the additional risk due to nanoparticles exposure from present materials is considered to be low. However, more research is needed, especially on vulnerable groups (asthma or COPD). An assessment of risks for the environment is not possible due to the lack of data. SIGNIFICANCE: Measures to reduce exposure to nanoparticles include intraorally grinding/polishing using water coolants, proper sculpturing to reduce the need for grinding and sufficient ventilation of treatment areas.
OBJECTIVE: Nanoparticles having a size from 1 to 100nm are present in nature and are successfully used in many products of daily life. Nanoparticles are also embedded per se or as byproducts from milling processes of larger filler particles in many dental materials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Recently, possible adverse effects of nanoparticles have gained increased interest with the lungs being a main target organ. Exposure to nanoparticles in dentistry may occur in the dental laboratory, by processing gypsum type products or by grinding and polishing materials. In the dental practice virtually no exposure to nanoparticles occurs when handling unset materials. However, nanoparticles are produced by intraoral adjustment of set restorative materials through grinding/polishing regardless whether they contain nanoparticles or not. Nanoparticles may also be produced through wear of restorations or released from dental implants and they enter the environment when removing restorations. The risk for dental technicians is taken care of by legal regulations. Based on model worst case mass-based calculations, the exposure of dental practice personnel and patients to nanoparticles through intraoral grinding/polishing and wear is low to negligible. Accordingly, the additional risk due to nanoparticles exposure from present materials is considered to be low. However, more research is needed, especially on vulnerable groups (asthma or COPD). An assessment of risks for the environment is not possible due to the lack of data. SIGNIFICANCE: Measures to reduce exposure to nanoparticles include intraorally grinding/polishing using water coolants, proper sculpturing to reduce the need for grinding and sufficient ventilation of treatment areas.
Authors: Amit Alexander; Mukta Agrawal; Ajaz Uddin; Sabahuddin Siddique; Ahmed M Shehata; Mahmoud A Shaker; Syed Ata Ur Rahman; Mohi Iqbal M Abdul; Mohamed A Shaker Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2019-07-30
Authors: Luigi Vimercati; Domenica Cavone; Antonio Caputi; Luigi De Maria; Michele Tria; Ermelinda Prato; Giovanni Maria Ferri Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2020-05-21
Authors: Aleksandra Skorulska; Paweł Piszko; Zbigniew Rybak; Maria Szymonowicz; Maciej Dobrzyński Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 3.623