Literature DB >> 28951002

Perinatal outcomes after gestational surrogacy versus autologous IVF: analysis of national data.

Sesh Kamal Sunkara1, Belavendra Antonisamy2, Hepsy Y Selliah2, Mohan S Kamath3.   

Abstract

Anonymized data were obtained from the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority to determine whether gestational surrogacy influences perinatal outcomes compared with pregnancies after autologous IVF. A total of 103,160 singleton live births, including 244 after gestational surrogacy, 87,571 after autologous fresh IVF and intractyoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and 15,345 after autologous frozen embryo transfers were analysed. Perinatal outcomes of pretern birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW) and high birth weight (HBW) were compared. No difference was found in the risk of PTB and LBW after gestational surrogacy compared with autologous fresh IVF-ICSI: PTB (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.42), LBW (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.43) and gestational surrogacy compared with autologous frozen embryo transfers: PTB (adjusted OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.60), LBW (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.96). The incidence of HBW was significantly higher after gestational surrogacy compared with fresh IVF-ICSI (adjusted OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.75); no difference was found in HBW between gestational surrogacy and autologous frozen embryo transfers. The dataset is limited by lack of information on confounders, i.e. ethnicity, body mass index, underlying medical history, which could result in residual confounding.
Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autologous IVF; gestational surrogacy; perinatal outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28951002     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of perinatal outcomes between spontaneous vs. commissioned cycles in gestational carriers for single and same-sex male intended parents.

Authors:  Z Pavlovic; K C Hammer; M Raff; P Patel; K N Kunze; B Kaplan; C Coughlin; J Hirshfeld-Cytron
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Obstetric Complications of Donor Egg Conception Pregnancies.

Authors:  Amit Shah; Maryam Parisaei; Jessica Garner
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-04-10

Review 3.  Risks in Surrogacy Considering the Embryo: From the Preimplantation to the Gestational and Neonatal Period.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Tsioulou; A Rapani; G Anifandis; A Pantou; S Bolaris; P Bakas; E Deligeoroglou; K Pantos; M Koutsilieris
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Perinatal Outcomes Following Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Parimala Chinta; Mohan S Kamath
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

5.  A survey of public attitudes toward uterus transplantation, surrogacy, and adoption in Japan.

Authors:  Akari Nakazawa; Tetsuya Hirata; Tomoko Arakawa; Natsuki Nagashima; Shinya Fukuda; Kazuaki Neriishi; Miyuki Harada; Yasushi Hirota; Kaori Koga; Osamu Wada-Hiraike; Yoshio Koizumi; Tomoyuki Fujii; Minoru Irahara; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.