Matthew Driller1, Kelsi Mackay2, Blair Mills3, Francisco Tavares3. 1. Health, Sport and Human Performance, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Electronic address: mdriller@waikato.ac.nz. 2. Health, Sport and Human Performance, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. 3. Health, Sport and Human Performance, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand; Chiefs Super Rugby, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Previous results from our laboratory suggest that band flossing results in increased ankle range of motion (ROM) and jump performance 5-min following application. However, the time-course of such benefits is yet to be examined. DESIGN: Parallel group design. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 69 recreational athletes (32 male/37 female). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants performed a weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT), a counter-movement jump (CMJ) and a 15 m sprint test (SPRINT) pre and up to 45-min post application of a floss band to both ankles (FLOSS) or without flossing of the ankle joints (CON). RESULTS: There was a significant intervention × time interaction in favour of FLOSS when compared to CON for the WBLT (p < 0.05). These results were associated with trivial to small effect sizes at all time points. Small, but non-significant (p > 0.05) benefits were seen for FLOSS when compared to CON for CMJ force (mean ± 90%CI: 89 ± 101 N) and 15 m SPRINT times (-0.06 ± 0.04 s) at 45-min post. CONCLUSION: There is a trend towards a benefit for the use of floss bands applied to the ankle joint to improve ROM, jump and sprint performance in recreational athletes for up to 45-min following their application.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Previous results from our laboratory suggest that band flossing results in increased ankle range of motion (ROM) and jump performance 5-min following application. However, the time-course of such benefits is yet to be examined. DESIGN: Parallel group design. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 69 recreational athletes (32 male/37 female). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants performed a weight-bearing lunge test (WBLT), a counter-movement jump (CMJ) and a 15 m sprint test (SPRINT) pre and up to 45-min post application of a floss band to both ankles (FLOSS) or without flossing of the ankle joints (CON). RESULTS: There was a significant intervention × time interaction in favour of FLOSS when compared to CON for the WBLT (p < 0.05). These results were associated with trivial to small effect sizes at all time points. Small, but non-significant (p > 0.05) benefits were seen for FLOSS when compared to CON for CMJ force (mean ± 90%CI: 89 ± 101 N) and 15 m SPRINT times (-0.06 ± 0.04 s) at 45-min post. CONCLUSION: There is a trend towards a benefit for the use of floss bands applied to the ankle joint to improve ROM, jump and sprint performance in recreational athletes for up to 45-min following their application.