Antoni Bayés-Genis1,2, David E Lanfear3, Maurice W J de Ronde4,5, Josep Lupón1,2, Joost J Leenders6, Zhen Liu6, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff7, Marinus J C Eijkemans7, Elisabet Zamora1,2, Marta De Antonio1, Aeilko H Zwinderman5, Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma4,5, Yigal M Pinto6,8. 1. Heart Failure Unit, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Badalona, Spain. 2. Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Henry Ford Hospital, Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, MI, USA. 4. Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. ACS Biomarker BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 8. Heart Failure Research Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIMS: Small studies suggested circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers for heart failure (HF). However, standardized approaches and quality assessment for measuring circulating miRNAs are not uniformly established, and most studies have been small, so that results are inconsistent. We used a standardized data handling protocol, optimized for circulating miRNA qPCRs to remove noise and used it to assess which circulating miRNAs robustly add prognostic information in patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured 12 miRNAs in two independent cohorts totalling 2203 subjects. Cohort I (Barcelona) comprised 834 chronic HF patients. Cohort II (Detroit) comprised 1369 chronic HF patients. Each sample was measured in duplicate, and normalized to a very abundant and stable miRNA (miR-486-5p). We used a multistep algorithm to distinguish false amplification signals and thus classify each miRNA measurement as 'valid', 'undetectable' or 'invalid'. Higher levels of miR-1254 and miR-1306-5p were significantly associated with risk of the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization in both cohorts, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.11 to 1.21 per log increase (P-values 0.004 to 0.009). However, adding these miRNAs to established predictors (age, sex, haemoglobin, renal function, and NT-proBNP) did not further augment the c-statistic beyond 0.69 (cohort I) or 0.70 (cohort II). CONCLUSION: We used a stringent quality assessment for miRNA testing, and were able to replicate the association of miR-1254 and miR-1306-5p with risk of death and HF hospitalization in HF patients of two independent cohorts. However, these two circulating miRNAs failed to improve prognostication over established predictors.
AIMS: Small studies suggested circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers for heart failure (HF). However, standardized approaches and quality assessment for measuring circulating miRNAs are not uniformly established, and most studies have been small, so that results are inconsistent. We used a standardized data handling protocol, optimized for circulating miRNA qPCRs to remove noise and used it to assess which circulating miRNAs robustly add prognostic information in patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured 12 miRNAs in two independent cohorts totalling 2203 subjects. Cohort I (Barcelona) comprised 834 chronic HF patients. Cohort II (Detroit) comprised 1369 chronic HF patients. Each sample was measured in duplicate, and normalized to a very abundant and stable miRNA (miR-486-5p). We used a multistep algorithm to distinguish false amplification signals and thus classify each miRNA measurement as 'valid', 'undetectable' or 'invalid'. Higher levels of miR-1254 and miR-1306-5p were significantly associated with risk of the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization in both cohorts, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.11 to 1.21 per log increase (P-values 0.004 to 0.009). However, adding these miRNAs to established predictors (age, sex, haemoglobin, renal function, and NT-proBNP) did not further augment the c-statistic beyond 0.69 (cohort I) or 0.70 (cohort II). CONCLUSION: We used a stringent quality assessment for miRNA testing, and were able to replicate the association of miR-1254 and miR-1306-5p with risk of death and HF hospitalization in HF patients of two independent cohorts. However, these two circulating miRNAs failed to improve prognostication over established predictors.
Authors: Rocío Toro; Sara Blasco-Turrión; Francisco José Morales-Ponce; Pablo Gonzalez; Pablo Martínez-Camblor; Amador López-Granados; Ramon Brugada; Oscar Campuzano; Alexandra Pérez-Serra; Felix Rosa Longobardo; Alipio Mangas; Vicenta Llorente-Cortes; David de Gonzalo-Calvo Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2018-07-14 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Hongsheng Gui; Ruicong She; Jasmine Luzum; Jia Li; Timothy D Bryson; Yigal Pinto; Hani N Sabbah; L Keoki Williams; David E Lanfear Journal: Circ Genom Precis Med Date: 2021-05-17
Authors: David de Gonzalo-Calvo; Germán Cediel; Christian Bär; Julio Núñez; Elena Revuelta-Lopez; Josep Gavara; César Ríos-Navarro; Vicenta Llorente-Cortes; Vicente Bodí; Thomas Thum; Antoni Bayes-Genis Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Evelyn M Templeton; Vicky A Cameron; John W Pickering; A Mark Richards; Anna P Pilbrow Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2021-09 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: David de Gonzalo-Calvo; Pablo Martínez-Camblor; Christian Bär; Kevin Duarte; Nicolas Girerd; Bengt Fellström; Roland E Schmieder; Alan G Jardine; Ziad A Massy; Hallvard Holdaas; Patrick Rossignol; Faiez Zannad; Thomas Thum Journal: Theranostics Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Jan-Thorben Sieweke; Tobias Jonathan Pfeffer; Saskia Biber; Shambhabi Chatterjee; Karin Weissenborn; Gerrit M Grosse; Jan Hagemus; Anselm A Derda; Dominik Berliner; Ralf Lichtinghagen; Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner; Johann Bauersachs; Christian Bär; Thomas Thum; Udo Bavendiek Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 4.241