Literature DB >> 28948893

State of the art in vivo imaging techniques for laboratory animals.

David Tibor Lauber1, András Fülöp1, Tibor Kovács1,2, Krisztián Szigeti2, Domokos Máthé2,3, Attila Szijártó1.   

Abstract

In recent decades, imaging devices have become indispensable tools in the basic sciences, in preclinical research and in modern drug development. The rapidly evolving high-resolution in vivo imaging technologies provide a unique opportunity for studying biological processes of living organisms in real time on a molecular level. State of the art small-animal imaging modalities provide non-invasive images rich in quantitative anatomical and functional information, which renders longitudinal studies possible allowing precise monitoring of disease progression and response to therapy in models of different diseases. The number of animals in a scientific investigation can be substantially reduced using imaging techniques, which is in full compliance with the ethical endeavours for the 3R (reduction, refinement, replacement) policies formulated by Russell and Burch; furthermore, biological variability can be alleviated, as each animal serves as its own control. The most suitable and commonly used imaging modalities for in vivo small-animal imaging are optical imaging (OI), ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and finally the methods of nuclear medicine: positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

Keywords:  CT; MRI; imaging modalities; molecular imaging; optical imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28948893     DOI: 10.1177/0023677217695852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  20 in total

1.  In Vivo Imaging With Confirmation by Histopathology for Increased Rigor and Reproducibility in Translational Research: A Review of Examples, Options, and Resources.

Authors:  Kathleen Gabrielson; Robert Maronpot; Sébastien Monette; Coraline Mlynarczyk; Yuval Ramot; Abraham Nyska; Polina Sysa-Shah
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  PEGylated peptide to TIP1 is a novel targeting agent that binds specifically to various cancers in vivo.

Authors:  Vaishali Kapoor; Abhay Kumar Singh; Buck E Rogers; Dinesh Thotala; Dennis E Hallahan
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Illuminating human disease: The potential of in vivo imaging for preclinical research and diagnostics.

Authors:  Philip Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 4.  In Vivo Imaging-Driven Approaches to Study Virus Dissemination and Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Pradeep D Uchil; Kelsey A Haugh; Ruoxi Pi; Walther Mothes
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 10.431

Review 5.  Mechanisms of cellular and humoral immunity through the lens of VLP-based vaccines.

Authors:  Hunter McFall-Boegeman; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 5.217

6.  Orally Deliverable Dual-Targeted Pellets for the Synergistic Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Tang; Meng Yang; Yongwei Gu; Liangdi Jiang; Yue Du; Jiyong Liu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Fluorescence Molecular Tomography for In Vivo Imaging of Glioblastoma Xenografts.

Authors:  Jorge A Benitez; Ciro Zanca; Jianhui Ma; Webster K Cavenee; Frank B Furnari
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  Choosing The Right Animal Model for Renal Cancer Research.

Authors:  Paweł Sobczuk; Anna Brodziak; Mohammed Imran Khan; Stuti Chhabra; Michał Fiedorowicz; Marlena Wełniak-Kamińska; Kamil Synoradzki; Ewa Bartnik; Agnieszka Cudnoch-Jędrzejewska; Anna M Czarnecka
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Optimization of In Vivo Studies by Combining Planar Dynamic and Tomographic Imaging: Workflow Evaluation on a Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles System.

Authors:  Maritina Rouchota; Alessio Adamiano; Michele Iafisco; Eirini Fragogeorgi; Irineos Pilatis; Gilles Doumont; Sébastien Boutry; Daniele Catalucci; Argyro Zacharioudaki; George C Kagadis
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Performance of nanoScan PET/CT and PET/MR for quantitative imaging of 18F and 89Zr as compared with ex vivo biodistribution in tumor-bearing mice.

Authors:  Marion Chomet; Maxime Schreurs; Ricardo Vos; Mariska Verlaan; Esther J Kooijman; Alex J Poot; Ronald Boellaard; Albert D Windhorst; Guus Ams van Dongen; Danielle J Vugts; Marc C Huisman; Wissam Beaino
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.