| Literature DB >> 28948882 |
Jan-Peter Voß1, Nina Amelung1,2.
Abstract
We reconstruct the innovation journey of 'citizen panels', as a family of participation methods, over four decades and across different sites of development and application. A process of aggregation leads from local practices of designing participatory procedures like the citizens jury, planning cell, or consensus conference in the 1970s and 1980s, to the disembedding and proliferation of procedural formats in the 1990s, and into the trans-local consolidation of participatory practices through laboratory-based expertise since about 2000. Our account highlights a central irony: anti-technocratic engagements with governance gave birth to efforts at establishing technoscientific control over questions of political procedure. But such efforts have been met with various forms of reflexive engagement that draw out implications and turn design questions back into matters of concern. An emerging informal assessment regime for technologies of participation as yet prevents closure on one dominant global design for democracy beyond the state.Keywords: citizens jury; consensus conference; innovation in governance; planning cell; public participation; technology assessment
Year: 2016 PMID: 28948882 DOI: 10.1177/0306312716641350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soc Stud Sci ISSN: 0306-3127 Impact factor: 3.885