Mahmoud Eldirani1, Omar Chehab1, Hussein Hassan1, Hani Tamim1, Habib A Dakik2. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. hd01@aub.edu.lb.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is commonly utilized for the non-invasive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). It is either performed with exercise or pharmacologic stress. The objective of this study is to compare the referral patterns and diagnostic findings in patients referred for pharmacologic vs exercise MPI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective study of 429 consecutive patients who were referred for MPI at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (23% had pharmacologic stress with dipyridamole and 77% had exercise stress testing). Patients referred to pharmacologic stress were older, had a higher percentage of women, and a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension. There were more abnormal scans in the pharmacologic stress group (38% vs 20%, P < 0.001), as well as a higher prevalence of ischemia (21% vs 13%, P < 0.001) and impaired left ventricular function with an ejection fraction < 50% (19% vs 7.9%, P < 0.001). The significant predictors for referral to pharmacologic stress by multivariable logistic regression analysis were older age (OR = 2.01 (1.57-2.57), P < 0.001) and diabetes (OR = 2.04 (1.19-3.49), P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Patients referred for pharmacologic stress MPI are at a higher risk than those referred for exercise stress MPI with more CAD risk factors, older age, and a higher prevalence of abnormal MPI findings.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is commonly utilized for the non-invasive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). It is either performed with exercise or pharmacologic stress. The objective of this study is to compare the referral patterns and diagnostic findings in patients referred for pharmacologic vs exercise MPI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective study of 429 consecutive patients who were referred for MPI at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (23% had pharmacologic stress with dipyridamole and 77% had exercise stress testing). Patients referred to pharmacologic stress were older, had a higher percentage of women, and a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension. There were more abnormal scans in the pharmacologic stress group (38% vs 20%, P < 0.001), as well as a higher prevalence of ischemia (21% vs 13%, P < 0.001) and impaired left ventricular function with an ejection fraction < 50% (19% vs 7.9%, P < 0.001). The significant predictors for referral to pharmacologic stress by multivariable logistic regression analysis were older age (OR = 2.01 (1.57-2.57), P < 0.001) and diabetes (OR = 2.04 (1.19-3.49), P = 0.009). CONCLUSION:Patients referred for pharmacologic stress MPI are at a higher risk than those referred for exercise stress MPI with more CAD risk factors, older age, and a higher prevalence of abnormal MPI findings.
Authors: Lee A Fleisher; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Andrew D Auerbach; Susan A Barnason; Joshua A Beckman; Biykem Bozkurt; Victor G Davila-Roman; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Thomas A Holly; Garvan C Kane; Joseph E Marine; M Timothy Nelson; Crystal C Spencer; Annemarie Thompson; Henry H Ting; Barry F Uretsky; Duminda N Wijeysundera Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; Sean W Hayes; James Min; John D Friedman; Louise E J Thomson; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sachin M Navare; Jeff F Mather; Leslee J Shaw; Michael S Fowler; Gary V Heller Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-11-13 Impact factor: 5.952