Literature DB >> 28948363

Asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation methods to characterize submicron particles: application to carbon-based aggregates and nanoplastics.

Julien Gigault1, Hind El Hadri2, Stéphanie Reynaud2, Elise Deniau2, Bruno Grassl2.   

Abstract

In the last 10 years, asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation (AF4) has been one of the most promising approaches to characterize colloidal particles. Nevertheless, despite its potentialities, it is still considered a complex technique to set up, and the theory is difficult to apply for the characterization of complex samples containing submicron particles and nanoparticles. In the present work, we developed and propose a simple analytical strategy to rapidly determine the presence of several submicron populations in an unknown sample with one programmed AF4 method. To illustrate this method, we analyzed polystyrene particles and fullerene aggregates of size covering the whole colloidal size distribution. A global and fast AF4 method (method O) allowed us to screen the presence of particles with size ranging from 1 to 800 nm. By examination of the fractionating power F d, as proposed in the literature, convenient fractionation resolution was obtained for size ranging from 10 to 400 nm. The global F d values, as well as the steric inversion diameter, for the whole colloidal size distribution correspond to the predicted values obtained by model studies. On the basis of this method and without the channel components or mobile phase composition being changed, four isocratic subfraction methods were performed to achieve further high-resolution separation as a function of different size classes: 10-100 nm, 100-200 nm, 200-450 nm, and 450-800 nm in diameter. Finally, all the methods developed were applied in characterization of nanoplastics, which has received great attention in recent years. Graphical Absract Characterization of the nanoplastics by asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation within the colloidal size range.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colloidal materials; Field flow fractionation; Interlaboratory comparison; Nanoplastics

Year:  2017        PMID: 28948363     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0629-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  7 in total

1.  In-house validation of AF4-MALS-UV for polystyrene nanoplastic analysis.

Authors:  Beatrice Battistini; Francesco Petrucci; Beatrice Bocca
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Identification and removal of micro- and nano-plastics: Efficient and cost-effective methods.

Authors:  Aayushi Kundu; Nagaraj P Shetti; Soumen Basu; Kakarla Raghava Reddy; Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda; Tejraj M Aminabhavi
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 16.744

3.  Finding the tiny plastic needle in the haystack: how field flow fractionation can help to analyze nanoplastics in food.

Authors:  Katrin Loeschner; Janja Vidmar; Nanna B Hartmann; André Marcel Bienfait; Milica Velimirovic
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 4.478

4.  Combining microcavity size selection with Raman microscopy for the characterization of Nanoplastics in complex matrices.

Authors:  Andrea Valsesia; Monica Quarato; Jessica Ponti; Francesco Fumagalli; Douglas Gilliland; Pascal Colpo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Field-Portable Microplastic Sensing in Aqueous Environments: A Perspective on Emerging Techniques.

Authors:  Morgan G Blevins; Harry L Allen; Beckett C Colson; Anna-Marie Cook; Alexandra Z Greenbaum; Sheila S Hemami; Joseph Hollmann; Ernest Kim; Ava A LaRocca; Kenneth A Markoski; Peter Miraglia; Vienna L Mott; William M Robberson; Jose A Santos; Melissa M Sprachman; Patricia Swierk; Steven Tate; Mark F Witinski; Louis B Kratchman; Anna P M Michel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Liuwei Wang; Wei-Min Wu; Nanthi S Bolan; Daniel C W Tsang; Yang Li; Muhan Qin; Deyi Hou
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 7.  Characterisation of particles in solution - a perspective on light scattering and comparative technologies.

Authors:  Ciarán Manus Maguire; Matthias Rösslein; Peter Wick; Adriele Prina-Mello
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 8.090

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.