| Literature DB >> 28947910 |
Xiao Ling1,2, Yuqiang Xiang1,2, Qingfa Tang1,2, Zhen Jin1,2, Feilong Chen1,2, Xiaomei Tan1,2.
Abstract
Puerariae Lobatae Radix, known as Gegen in Chinese, is widely used to treat cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and many other chronic illnesses. Flavonoids are the main active components in Gegen and are found in high concentrations in soybeans. Few studies, however, have focused on the effects of flavonoid-rich food on the absorption of Gegen. Here, we report an in vivo pharmacokinetic study on rats to explore the effects of soybean milk on the absorption of Gegen and an in vitro Ussing chamber study of puerarin intestinal transmembrane absorption. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values of puerarin in rats were significantly decreased after drinking soybean milk, when taking Gegen decoction or a Gegen patent medicine (P < 0.01). In the Ussing chamber experiment, cumulative transmission (Qtn) after 2 h and apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) were lower in the puerarin-daidzin and puerarin-soybean milk solution groups than in the puerarin group. Daidzin in soybean milk inhibited the transmembrane transport of puerarin, resulting in decreased bioavailability of puerarin in Gegen. The results of this study strongly suggest that Gegen should not be taken with flavonoid-rich food, particularly soybean products.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28947910 PMCID: PMC5602493 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7146813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Product ion mass spectra and chemical structures of puerarin and naringin (IS). ∗∗ represents the molecular weight of the possible product ions.
MRM parameters of puerarin, daidzin, and naringin.
| Compound | Precursor ion | Product ion | Dwell | Fragment | Collison energy | Polarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puerarin | 417.0 | 297.0 | 200 | 135.0 | 20.0 | + |
| Daidzin | 417.0 | 255.2 | 200 | 135.0 | 10.0 | + |
| Naringin | 581.0 | 273.0 | 200 | 120.0 | 24.0 | + |
Figure 2Mean concentration-time profiles of puerarin in rat plasma after oral administration of Yufeng Ningxin tablets and Gegen decoction (equivalent to 10 mg/kg puerarin). Each pointer presents the mean ± SD (n = 6).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of puerarin after oral administration of Gegen decoction to rats (n = 6, ).
| G group | GS group | |
|---|---|---|
| AUC0– | 346.34 ± 49.91 | 238.57 ± 48.53 |
| MRT0– | 9.90 ± 0.88 | 8.47 ± 0.76 |
|
| 24.99 ± 18.65 | 16.46 ± 9.68 |
|
| 0.46 ± 0.29 | 0.79 ± 0.46 |
|
| 76.55 ± 14.69 | 52.35 ± 15.73 |
|
| 533.85 ± 273.81 | 724.71 ± 357.63 |
| CL | 19.75 ± 8.47 | 28.19 ± 13.36 |
P < 0.01 compared with G group; G group was given Gegen decoction; GS group was given Gegen decoction soybean milk solution.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of puerarin after oral administration of Yufeng Ningxin tablets to rats (n = 6, ).
| Y group | YS group | |
|---|---|---|
| AUC0– | 730.46 ± 150.63 | 246.69 ± 106.00## |
| MRT0– | 4.95 ± 1.33 | 4.64 ± 1.34 |
|
| 9.54 ± 4.21 | 8.58 ± 10.10 |
|
| 1.08 ± 0.58 | 0.88 ± 0.63 |
|
| 188.21 ± 118.78 | 51.80 ± 17.67## |
|
| 150.83 ± 64.98 | 312.97 ± 137.45## |
| CL | 11.17 ± 1.84 | 37.15 ± 14.10## |
## P < 0.01 compared with Y group; Y group was given Yufeng Ningxin aqueous solution; YS group was given Yufeng Ningxin soybean milk solution. All the four dose regimens are equal to 10 mg/kg puerarin.
Figure 3Qtn and Papp of puerarin in the intestinal absorption study in six groups with the same puerarin concentration (0.3 mg/mL). Y group, YS group, P group (puerarin aqueous solution), PS group (puerarin-soybean milk solution), PD group (puerarin and daidzin), and PV group (puerarin and verapamil). #P < 0.01 compared with Y group; P < 0.01 compared with P group.
Figure 4Representative multiple reaction monitoring chromatograms of (a) puerarin and (b) naringin (IS) in (1) blank plasma, (2) blank plasma spiked with standard solution and internal standard, (3) plasma sample after oral administration of puerarin, (4) blank Krebs-Ringer solution, (5) blank Krebs-Ringer solution spiked with standard solution and internal standard, and (6) Ussing chamber sample.
Summary of recovery, matrix effect, accuracy, and precision of puerarin for the UHPLC-MS/MS method in rat plasma (n = 6, ).
| Spiked conc. (ng·mL−1) of puerarin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 100 | 750 | ||
| Recovery (%) | 98.50 ± 14.51 | 111.05 ± 15.06 | 114.85 ± 6.06 | |
| Matrix effect (%) | 96.50 ± 12.28 | 97.49 ± 6.42 | 87.85 ± 9.66 | |
| Precision | Intraday | 14.73 | 13.56 | 7.68 |
| RSD% | Interday | 8.99 | 8.71 | 4.63 |
| Accuracy | Intraday | −5.04 | 11.05 | 1.02 |
| RE% | Interday | −3.02 | 7.54 | 11.11 |
Summary of stability of puerarin for the UHPLC-MS/MS method in rat plasma (n = 6).
| Spiked conc. (ng·mL−1) of puerarin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 100 | 750 | ||
| 3 freeze-thaw cycles | Precision (RSD%) | 14.20 | 2.84 | 6.24 |
| Accuracy (RE%) | −12.22 | 11.02 | 13.41 | |
| Long-term | Precision (RSD%) | 8.97 | 5.71 | 5.06 |
| Accuracy (RE%) | −14.09 | −0.56 | 10.58 | |
| Postpreparation | Precision (RSD%) | 14.24 | 8.12 | 3.59 |
| Accuracy (RE%) | 14.02 | −3.19 | 11.79 | |
| Prepreparation | Precision (RSD%) | 13.03 | 1.04 | 7.29 |
| Accuracy (RE%) | −10.93 | 2.42 | 5.95 | |
Summary of recovery, matrix effect, accuracy, and precision of puerarin for the UHPLC-MS/MS method in Ussing chamber samples (n = 6, ).
| Spiked conc. (ng·mL−1) of puerarin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1000 | 2500 | ||
| Recovery (%) | 97.40 ± 0.80 | 92.00 ± 5.80 | 87.60 ± 4.20 | |
| Matrix effect (%) | 109.32 ± 4.18 | 100.21 ± 2.02 | 98.88 ± 2.16 | |
| Precision | Intraday | 7.51 | 3.56 | 6.13 |
| RSD% | Interday | 5.82 | 5.23 | 6.12 |
| Accuracy | Intraday | 1.15 | 5.00 | −5.60 |
| RE% | Interday | −4.25 | 7.00 | −6.40 |
Summary of stability of puerarin for the UHPLC-MS/MS method in Ussing chamber samples (n = 6).
| Spiked conc. (ng·mL−1) of puerarin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1000 | 2500 | ||
| 3 freeze-thaw cycles | Precision (RSD%) | 8.36 | 3.33 | 9.20 |
| Accuracy (RE%) | 2.39 | 7.20 | 0.09 | |
| Prepreparation | Precision (RSD%) | 5.80 | 5.21 | 6.14 |
| Accuracy (RE%) | −4.25 | 7.00 | −6.40 | |
| Postpreparation | Precision (RSD%) | 6.66 | 8.32 | 1.25 |
| Accuracy (RE%) | −2.38 | −5.38 | −6.1 | |
| Prepreparation | Precision (RSD%) | 7.23 | 2.13 | −2.32 |
| Accuracy (RE%) | 4.29 | 3.19 | −1.73 | |