Rachel M Landisch1, Ziyan Yin2, Melissa Christensen3, Aniko Szabo2, Amy J Wagner3. 1. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Electronic address: rlandisc@mcw.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 3. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Elective preterm delivery (EPD) of a fetus with gastroschisis may prevent demise and ameliorate intestinal injury. While the literature on optimal timing of delivery varies, we hypothesize that a potential benefit may be found with EPD. METHODS: A meta-analysis of publications describing timing of delivery in gastroschisis from 1/1990 to 8/2016 was performed, including studies where either elective preterm delivery (group 1, G1) or preterm gestational age (GA) (group 2, G2) were evaluated against respective comparators. The following outcomes were analyzed: total parenteral nutrition (TPN), first enteral feeding (FF), length of stay, ventilator days, fetal demise, complex gastroschisis, sepsis, and death. RESULTS: Eighteen studies describing 1430 gastroschisis patients were identified. G1 studies found less sepsis (p<0.01), fewer days to FF (p=0.03), and 11days less of TPN (p=0.07) in the preterm cohort. Comparatively, G2 studies showed less days to FF in term GA (p=0.02).Whereas G1 BWs were similar, G2 preterm had a significantly lower BW compared to controls (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elective preterm delivery appears favorable with respect to feeding and sepsis. However, benefits are lost when age is used as a surrogate of EPD. A randomized, prospective, multi-institutional trial is necessary to delineate whether EPD is advantageous to neonates with gastroschisis. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Elective preterm delivery (EPD) of a fetus with gastroschisis may prevent demise and ameliorate intestinal injury. While the literature on optimal timing of delivery varies, we hypothesize that a potential benefit may be found with EPD. METHODS: A meta-analysis of publications describing timing of delivery in gastroschisis from 1/1990 to 8/2016 was performed, including studies where either elective preterm delivery (group 1, G1) or preterm gestational age (GA) (group 2, G2) were evaluated against respective comparators. The following outcomes were analyzed: total parenteral nutrition (TPN), first enteral feeding (FF), length of stay, ventilator days, fetal demise, complex gastroschisis, sepsis, and death. RESULTS: Eighteen studies describing 1430 gastroschisis patients were identified. G1 studies found less sepsis (p<0.01), fewer days to FF (p=0.03), and 11days less of TPN (p=0.07) in the preterm cohort. Comparatively, G2 studies showed less days to FF in term GA (p=0.02).Whereas G1 BWs were similar, G2 preterm had a significantly lower BW compared to controls (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elective preterm delivery appears favorable with respect to feeding and sepsis. However, benefits are lost when age is used as a surrogate of EPD. A randomized, prospective, multi-institutional trial is necessary to delineate whether EPD is advantageous to neonates with gastroschisis. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Authors: Russell B Hawkins; Steven L Raymond; Shawn D St Peter; Cynthia D Downard; Faisal G Qureshi; Elizabeth Renaud; Paul D Danielson; Saleem Islam Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Adriana Lopez; Renata H Benjamin; Janhavi R Raut; Anushuya Ramakrishnan; Laura E Mitchell; Kuojen Tsao; Anthony Johnson; Peter H Langlois; Michael D Swartz; A J Agopian Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Mustafa Behram; Süleyman Cemil Oğlak; Seyithan Özaydın; Sema Süzen Çaypınar; İlker Gönen; Şeyhmus Tunç; Yusuf Başkıran; İsmail Özdemir Journal: Turk J Med Sci Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 0.973