Kidney allocation based on proven acceptable antigens results in superior graft survival in highly sensitized patients.

Highly sensitized renal transplant candidates accumulate on transplant waiting lists since they produce antibodies to many HLA antigens, which in this way become unacceptable. Organ allocation to these patients is usually based on avoiding transplantation of organs bearing these unacceptable antigens. In contrast, allocation through the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch (AM) program is based on extension of the patient's own HLA type with so-called acceptable HLA antigens to which strictly no antibodies are formed, as shown by extensive laboratory testing. We questioned which type of allocation results in the best long-term graft survival. Therefore, we selected 58,727 cadaveric single renal transplant recipients transplanted within Eurotransplant between 1996 and 2015 and determined factors influencing graft survival for patients transplanted through the AM program. Next, we compared ten-year graft survival of patients with various sensitization grades who received a renal transplant through regular allocation to that of highly sensitized patients transplanted through the AM program. Unlike regular allocation, no effect for HLA mismatches existed for AM patients, while factors that did affect graft survival were similar to those of the general kidney transplant population. AM patients had significantly superior ten-year graft survival compared to highly sensitized patients transplanted on the basis of avoidance of unacceptable mismatches. Strikingly, graft survival of AM patients receiving a repeat transplant was similar to that of nonsensitized repeat transplant recipients. Thus, allocation of kidneys to highly sensitized patients based on proven acceptable antigens results in a significantly better graft survival compared to mere avoidance of unacceptable mismatches.