Effects of Topical Tamoxifen on Wound Healing of Burned Skin in Rats.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the effects of the topical application of tamoxifen on wound healing of burned skin in Wistar rats by evaluating 3 healing characteristics: fibrotic tissue thickness (FTT), scar surface area (SSA), and angiogenesis in the healed scar tissue.
METHODS: Eighteen male Wistar rats were used in this study. A third-degree burn wound was made on the shaved animals' back, measuring 2×2×2 cm. In the first group, a 2% tamoxifen ointment was applied to the wound twice daily for 8 weeks. The second group received a placebo ointment during the same period. The third group did not receive any treatment and served as the control group.
RESULTS: The median (interquartile range=[Q1, Q3]) FTT was 1.35 (1.15, 1.62) mm, 1.00 (0.95, 1.02) mm, and 1.25 (0.8, 1.5) mm in the control, tamoxifen, and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.069). However, the FTT in the tamoxifen group was less than in the placebo and control groups. The median angiogenesis was 3.5 (3.00, 6.25), 8.00 (6.75, 9.25), and 7.00 (5.50, 8.25) vessels per high-power field for the control, tamoxifen, and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.067). However, the median angiogenesis was higher in the tamoxifen group than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the mean SSA between the tamoxifen group and the control group (P=0.990).
CONCLUSIONS: Local application of tamoxifen increased angiogenesis and decreased the FTT, with no change in the SSA in burned skin areas. These effects are expected to expedite the wound healing process, reducing contracture and preventing hypertrophic scar and keloid formation.

INTRODUCTION

Excessive scar formation after deep burns is inevitable. In the healing process, hypertrophic scars, keloids, and contracture can occur, which in turn cause emotional, social, and functional problems for the rest of the victim’s life.

The pathophysiology of the formation of hypertrophic scars, keloids, and contracture is not yet completely understood; for this reason, both surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities have yielded disappointing results.

Considering the high costs of excessive scar treatment despite various therapeutic strategies, controversies still exist regarding the best treatment. Therefore, it has been suggested that preventing excessive scar formation may be more effective [1].

Prevention of abnormal scarring after skin burns is a challenging problem, and several therapies exist for the reduction of hypertrophic scar and keloid formation. Tamoxifen is a nonsteroidal antagonist of estradiol used extensively in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. This drug reducing the production of collagen by decreasing transforming growth factor (TGF-β2), and can prevent fibroblast formation in wound healing. It is also implicated in the reduction of hypertrophic scar and keloid formation. Previous studies have shown the effects of tamoxifen on inhibiting fibroblasts in Dupuytren contracture affecting the palmar fascia [2], keloids [3] and retroperitoneal fibrosis [4]. In an in vitro study, it was shown that exposure to tamoxifen in human dermal cells could decrease cell growth factors (basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor), and it was suggested that the clinical use of tamoxifen may decrease scar formation [5]. A randomized controlled trial of 300 patients with a history of hypertrophic scarring showed that oral tamoxifen could significantly reduce hypertrophic scars after surgical incisions [6].

Tamoxifen prevents myofibroblast differentiation and may have a therapeutic role in chronic inflammatory conditions or cancer [7]. Prevention of keloid and hypertrophic scar formation is still a challenging field, and several different therapeutic modalities have been reviewed by Berman et al. [8].

This study aimed to assess the effects of the topical application of tamoxifen on wound healing of burned skin in Wistar rats by evaluating 3 healing characteristics: fibrotic tissue thickness (FTT), scar surface area (SSA), and angiogenesis in healed scar tissue.

METHODS

Eighteen male Wistar rats with a mean weight of 250 to 300 g were used in this study. The rats were obtained from our hospital animal experimental laboratory, and the study was conducted in the same laboratory. The rats were randomly divided into 3 groups, all with an equal number of animals. All animals were anesthetized via intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (60 mg/kg), and a 3-×3-cm area of dorsal hair was shaved (Fig. 1). A third-degree burn wound was made with a 2-×2-×2-cm stainless steel cube (Fig. 2) that was placed in 96°C water for 3 minutes and then was placed on the shaved area for 15 seconds (Fig. 3). All animals were kept under standard laboratory conditions and were provided with identical food and water during the study period. After recovery, rats were individually housed in separate cages. The cages were cleaned daily and kept free from infectious agents. In 2 of the groups, a 2% tamoxifen ointment or a placebo ointment was applied to the wound twice daily for 8 weeks. Each of the animals was kept in a separate cage to prevent licking of the applied ointment by other mice, so we did not use any cover or dressing over the wounds after applying the ointment.

Fig. 1.

An anaesthetized rat with a shaved back

Rats were anaesthetized and the dorsal hair was shaved in a 3×3 cm area.

Fig. 2.

Generating a third-degree burn wound

The designed instrument was heated in boiling water for 3 minutes at 96°C, and was put on the shaved area for 15 seconds to generate a third-degree burn wound.

Fig. 3.

Rats after burn wound generation

A third-degree burn wound was generated in all rats

In the first group, a 2% tamoxifen ointment was applied to the wound twice daily for 8 weeks. The second group received a placebo ointment during the same period. The third group did not receive any treatment and served as the control group. Tamoxifen and the placebo ointment were provided in similar tubes. Both tamoxifen and the placebo ointment were purchased from the Iran Hormone Pharmaceutical Company, Tehran, Iran. The 2% tamoxifen and placebo ointments were prepared in 2 differently colored containers without any labels. This drug made only for our experiment by the pharmaceutical company Pars Darou. The ingredients of the placebo ointment were a combination of glyceryl monostearate, liquid paraffin, petrolatum, propylene glycol, cetyl alcohol, and isopropyl myristate.

The ointment was the vehicle only, with no active ingredient. Throughout the entire period of this study, none of the investigators knew which ointment was tamoxifen, and each animal had a private code number, which was used as an identification code for pathology.

The protocol of the study was approved by the Animal Medical Ethics Committee of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences (Ref. letter no. s/340/3/5694). In order to collect specimens, the animals were euthanized at 8 weeks after the burn injury was made, under a high concentration of chloroform (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Wounds on the last day of the experiment

Gross view of wounds on the last day of the experiment. (A) A rat from the control group. (B) A rat from the placebo group. (C) A rat from the tamoxifen group. The arrows point to the wound scar sites.

Histopathological assessment

The wounds were photographed on the first and last day of the study. The SSA was calculated in square millimeters. For pathologic evaluation, excisional biopsies from the thickest area of the scar were performed, and the amount of fibrosis and angiogenesis were assessed via a microscopic examination. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to evaluate angiogenesis (vessels per high-power field, HPF) (Fig. 5), and Masson trichrome staining was used to measure the FTT in millimeters (Fig. 6). All measurements were conducted by 2 independent blinded pathologists. All participants in the project, including the laboratory staff, wound assessors, and the data analyzer were blinded to the group allocation and treatments.

Fig. 5.

Evaluation of angiogenesis

Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to evaluate angiogenesis (×400).

Fig. 6.

Measurements of fibrotic tissue thickness

Masson trichrome staining was used to measure fibrotic tissue thickness (×400).

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics such as median and the interquartile range (IQR; Q1, Q3) were used to present the results. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to analyze the differences among the 3 groups. P-values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Pairwise comparisons between the groups were performed using the Dunn method.

RESULTS

A summary of the data analysis results and comparisons across groups is presented in Table 1. At the end of the study, the median (IQR=[Q1, Q3]) FTT was 1.35 (1.15, 1.62) mm, 1.00 (0.95, 1.02) mm, and 1.25 (0.8, 1.5) mm in the control, tamoxifen, and placebo groups, respectively.

Table 1.

Comparison of tamoxifen with the control and placebo

Items	Fibrotic tissue (thickness, mm)	Angiogenesis (vessels/HPF)	Scar surface area (mm2)
Tamoxifen	1.00 (0.95, 1.02)	8.00 (6.75, 9.25)	77.50 (52.00, 100.00)
Control	1.35 (1.15, 1.62)	3.50 (3.00, 6.25)	89.00 (69.00, 112.50)
Placebo	1.25 (0.80, 1.50)	7.00 (5.50, 8.25)	49.00 (39.00, 60.00)
P-value	0.069	0.067	0.028
Pairwise comparisons by the Dunn method
A versus B	--[a)]	--[a)]	0.990
A versus C	--[a)]	--[a)]	0.160
B versus C	--[a)]	--[a)]	0.032

Data are presented as median (IQR=[Q1, Q3]).

HPF, high-power field; A, tamoxifen; B, control; C, placebo.

Multiple comparisons were not performed because the Kruskal-Wallis test results were not significantly different.

No significant difference was observed in the FTT across the groups (P=0.069). However, the FTT in the tamoxifen group was less than in the control and placebo groups. The median (IQR=[Q1, Q3]) angiogenesis was 3.5 (3.00, 6.25), 8.00 (6.75, 9.25) and 7.00 (5.50, 8.25) vessels/HPF for the control, tamoxifen, and placebo groups, respectively. The median angiogenesis was higher in the tamoxifen group than in the control group. However, these differences between the groups was not statistically significant (P=0.067).

The SSA was 89.00 (69.00, 112.50) mm2, 77.50 (52.00, 100.00) mm2, and 49.00 (39.00, 60.00) mm2 for the control, tamoxifen, and placebo groups, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed between the tamoxifen group and the control group (P=0.990). However, the SSA was significantly smaller in the placebo group than in the tamoxifen group (P=0.032).

DISCUSSION

This study found that local application of tamoxifen ointment could reduce excessive scar formation and wound contraction in third-degree burned skin. This effect may have been caused by inhibiting fibrin accumulation, facilitating the process of healing, and maintaining and increasing the blood supply to the wound.

The present study showed that tamoxifen reduced the thickness of the fibrotic tissue; however, this was not statistically significant, which might have been due to the limited number of samples. The clinical importance of this issue is that the prevention of hypertrophic scar and keloid formation is the most challenging problem in patients with severe burns.

In the present study, a significant decrease was observed in the final surface area of the scar in the placebo group compared with the tamoxifen group. It appears that wound coverage by the ointment in that group prevented the wound dehydration and facilitated wound re-epithelialization, which consequently increased fibroblast activity and reduced the final scar area. Inhibition of wound contraction is clinically important because it would not only ameliorate problems such as pain, deformity, and limitations in body movements, but also reduce the need for surgical correction [9].

There was no statistically significant reduction in the final surface area of the scars in the tamoxifen group compared with the control group. This was most likely due to the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on the TGF-β activation pathway, which leads to the inhibition of myofibroblast induction; these events ultimately reduce α-smooth muscle actin and extracellular matrix proteins (such as collagen and fibronectin) as suppliers of wound contraction power. Thus, wound contraction is reduced. Hu et al. have also shown that tamoxifen reduces wound contraction by inhibiting the collagen network [10,11].

Tamoxifen pills (Nolvadex) are used to prevent and treat estrogen receptor-positive types of breast cancer. A liquefied form of tamoxifen (Soltamox) is also available. Tamoxifen ointment is used mainly for experimental proposes. Tamoxifen can cause side effects, including weight gain, sexual problems, thromboembolic events, stroke, and neurocognitive problems [12]. These systemic side effects are important, and the long-term use of oral tamoxifen should therefore be avoided.

The mechanisms of the effects of tamoxifen are complex and have not been clearly defined. It binds to estrogen receptors and blocks the proliferative action of estrogen in mammary cells. This action of tamoxifen is induced by the synthesis of the cytokine TGF-β, which acts as a negative autocrine regulatory molecule [13].

Leventhal et al. [14], in a meta-analysis, reviewed 36 articles published about the outcomes of various types of treatment modalities, and concluded that there was no optimal treatment modality for the management of keloid and hypertrophic scars.

Topical applications for the treatment or prevention of postsurgical skin injuries are noninvasive and more comfortable, and also cost less than other modalities [15].

Mikulec et al. [16] proposed that tamoxifen may improve wound healing in keloids by reducing the expression of TGF-β1.

Foo and Tristani-Firouzi [17] reviewed topical modalities for the treatment and prevention of post-surgical hypertrophic scars, argued that there is no universally accepted treatment for the prevention or elimination of hypertrophic scars, and then recommended “massage therapy” for the reduction of post-burn scarring.

Based on the results of this study, it appears that the use of tamoxifen locally on the burned skin of rats caused an increase in angiogenesis, decreased the FTT, and caused no significant change in the final scar size in the burned areas. These factors can expedite the wound healing process by reducing contracture and preventing hypertrophic scar and keloid formation. Moreover, the local use of tamoxifen locally does not carry the risk of systemic side effects of the drug.