| Literature DB >> 28946699 |
Pin-Kuei Fu1,2,3, Chi-Yu Yang4, Su-Chin Huang5, Yu-Wen Hung6, Kee-Ching Jeng7, Ying-Pei Huang8, Hong Chuang9, Nai-Chun Huang10, Jui-Ping Li11, Ming-Hua Hsu12, Jen-Kun Chen13,14,15.
Abstract
Paeonol is a key phenolic compound in the root bark of Moutan Cortex Radicis that has been used in traditional Chinese Medicine to ameliorate inflammation. A series of aminothiazole-paeonol derivatives (APDs) were synthesized in this work and subjected to preliminary evaluation in cells followed by verification in animals. Quantification of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in culture media of LPS-activated A549 cells, a lung epithelial adenocarcinoma cell line, were used to investigate the anti-inflammatory capability of APDs. ALI-bearing rats were employed to verify therapeutic efficacy of APDs according to observations of total cells, protein amounts, MCP-1 and IL-6 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Histopathological examinations of lung tissues were consequently applied for validation of APDs. Among these compounds, 2-(2-aminothiazol-4-yl)-5-methoxyphenol (4) had the most potent activity, showing comparable inhibition of MCP-1/IL-6 and superior elimination of neutrophil infiltration and protein exudation in lungs compared to others as well as dexamethasone. This study demonstrated a comprehensive strategy to evaluate APDs through integration of cell-based screening and animal-based verification. In order to fulfill unmet needs of treating acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), APDs introduced in this work could be promising lead compounds to develop high potent anti-inflammation agents.Entities:
Keywords: Moutan Cortex Radicis; acute lung injury; acute respiratory distress syndrome; aminothiazole-paeonol derivatives; anti-inflammation agents; paeonol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28946699 PMCID: PMC6151495 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22101605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of aminothiazole-paeonol derivatives (APDs) as anti-inflammation agents in this study.
Figure 1Preliminary screening protocols for anti-inflammation potency of APDs using the LPS-activated A549 cell model.
Secretion of MCP-1 in conditioned media of LPS-activated A549 cells treated with low (1.0 µg/mL) and high (10 µg/mL) concentrations of Dexa, paeonol, and APDs.
| Drugs (Symbols) | Secretion of MCP-1 in Conditioned Media (pg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|
| Low Dose Treatment | High Dose Treatment | |
| Dexamethasone (Dexa) | 2669 ± 578 * | 2538 ± 343 * |
| Paeonol (P) | 3938 ± 106 | 3584 ± 329 |
| 2 (P-2) | 4332 ± 332 | 3610 ± 505 |
| 3 (P-3) | 3618 ± 267 | 4446 ± 201 |
| 4 (P-4) | 2724 ± 254 * | 2077 ± 111 * |
| 4.HCl (P-4.HCl) | 3323 ± 261 | 2826 ± 362 * |
| 5a (P-5a) | 3980 ± 424 | 3225 ± 76 |
| 5b (P-5b) | 3983 ± 120 | 3786 ± 131 |
| 5c (P-5c) | 4238 ± 464 | 3793 ± 176 |
| 5d (P-5d) | 4140 ± 416 | 4118 ± 372 |
| 5e (P-5e) | 4002 ± 125 | 3893 ± 312 |
| 5f (P-5f) | 4050 ± 2.3 | 4334 ± 544 |
| 5g (P-5g) | 4354 ± 155 | 4628 ± 89 |
Significant differences of MCP-1 secretion between positive control group and each treatment group at p values less than 0.05 were annotated with *. The MCP-1 concentration in positive control (LPS-activated) groups was 4163.5 pg/mL.
Figure 2Secretion of (A) MCP-1 and (B) IL-6 in conditioned media of LPS-activated A549 cells treated with Dexa (1.0 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL) and selected APDs (1.0 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL). Significant differences between each treatment group and LPS-activated (positive control) group at p values less than 0.05 were annotated with *.
Figure 3Viabilities of A549 cells at 24 h post-treatment of selected APDs. The P-4, P-4.HCl and P-5c represented the Compound 4, 4.HCl and 5c shown in Figure 1.
Figure 4Verification protocols of LPS-challenged ALI-bearing rats treated with testing chemicals (APDs, paeonol, and dexamethasone).
Figure 5Biological responses of ALI-bearing rats treated with Dexa, paeonol and selected APDs on (A) total cell counts, (B) total protein concentrations, (C) IL-6 and (D) MCP-1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Significant differences between each treatment group and LPS-treated (positive control) group at p values less than 0.05 were annotated with *.
Figure 6Histopathological examination of H&E stained lung tissues collected from: (A) non-challenged (negative control), (B) LPS-challenged (positive control) rats without treatment and ALI-bearing rats treated with (C) Dexa, (D) paeonol, (E) Compound 4, and (F) Compound 4.HCl. Rats were consequently sacrificed at 8 h after intratracheal administration of LPS (8 mg/kg). The alveolar spaces (∗) filled with the mixture of red blood cells (→) and mononuclear/neutrophilic infiltrates (⇧) combined with biological responses observed in BALF were integrated to comprehensively evaluate therapeutic efficacy of APDs. (Scale bar: 100 µm).