Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa1, Esther Landa Torre2, Juan Carlos López-Mugartza2, Ellen Bialystok3, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla4,5. 1. Department of Education and Psychology, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain. 2. Department of Philology and Didactics of the Language, Public University of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain. 3. Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada. 4. IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain. 5. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a literature review of the administration and scoring criteria used in normative studies of verbal fluency tests (VFT), and to propose a new model for the administration and scoring of phonological, semantic, and action VFT for use in Spanish-speakers. METHODS: A literature search was performed using four databases Dialnet, ProQuest (PsycINFO, PsycArticles), Science Direct (Elsevier), and PubMed and 47 articles met the following criteria: 1) articles which contained normative data of phonological, semantic, or action VFT, 2) published between 2000 and 2015, 3) published in English or Spanish, 4) used healthy population. RESULTS: Of 2087 citations retrieved, 47 eligible studies were reviewed. The majority of the studies have been conducted in the USA, and with English and Spanish speakers. Only 12 studies provided the instruction, and 23 clearly describe the scoring guidelines. Moreover, among the studies that provided these information important discrepancies were found. Therefore, a new administration and scoring guidelines are presented, which may resolve this problem and be utilized in Spanish speaking countries. CONCLUSIONS: This review showed that still there is no consensus regarding the administration and scoring of VFT. A new method of administration and scoring is presented that can be use with Spanish-speakers.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a literature review of the administration and scoring criteria used in normative studies of verbal fluency tests (VFT), and to propose a new model for the administration and scoring of phonological, semantic, and action VFT for use in Spanish-speakers. METHODS: A literature search was performed using four databases Dialnet, ProQuest (PsycINFO, PsycArticles), Science Direct (Elsevier), and PubMed and 47 articles met the following criteria: 1) articles which contained normative data of phonological, semantic, or action VFT, 2) published between 2000 and 2015, 3) published in English or Spanish, 4) used healthy population. RESULTS: Of 2087 citations retrieved, 47 eligible studies were reviewed. The majority of the studies have been conducted in the USA, and with English and Spanish speakers. Only 12 studies provided the instruction, and 23 clearly describe the scoring guidelines. Moreover, among the studies that provided these information important discrepancies were found. Therefore, a new administration and scoring guidelines are presented, which may resolve this problem and be utilized in Spanish speaking countries. CONCLUSIONS: This review showed that still there is no consensus regarding the administration and scoring of VFT. A new method of administration and scoring is presented that can be use with Spanish-speakers.
Authors: Alberto Rodríguez-Lorenzana; Itziar Benito-Sánchez; Lila Adana-Díaz; Clara Patricia Paz; Tarquino Yacelga Ponce; Diego Rivera; Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2020-05-27
Authors: Joaquín A Ibáñez-Alfonso; Rosalba Company-Córdoba; Claudia García de la Cadena; Ian C Simpson; Diego Rivera; Antonio Sianes Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-06-25