| Literature DB >> 28946500 |
Xue Yang1, Yunliang Li2, Suyun Li3, Ayobami Olayemi Oladejo4, Yucheng Wang1, Shanfen Huang1, Cunshan Zhou1, Xiaofei Ye5, Haile Ma6, Yuqing Duan1.
Abstract
The effects of ultrasound-assisted α-amylase degradation (UAD) treatment with multiple modes on the extraction of rice protein (RP) from rice dreg powder were studied. The results showed that UAD treatment increased protein extraction rate significantly (p<0.05) compared to that of α-amylase degradation treatment and control. Among all the ultrasound mode treatments researched in this paper, sequential frequency ultrasound treatment presented higher protein extraction rate compared to that of simultaneous or single frequency ultrasound treatment. The highest protein extraction rate was obtained under 20/35kHz of sequential frequency UAD treatment with the protein extraction rate of 89.58% and protein purity of 92.99%. The test and analysis of fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, starch content, non-protein nitrogen content, SH and SS content, surface hydrophobicity, amino acids content and proteins characteristics were studied to reveal the mechanism of UAD on the protein extraction effect. After treated with UAD, the starch-protein agglomerates disintegrated completely, moreover, protein advanced structure was changed to some extent and the disulfide bond was partially broken, but the main chain structure (peptide chain), specificity of protein and amino acid composition were not obviously changed. Consequently, the structure modified RP extracted by UAD treatment presented higher solubility, emulsifying activity and foaming capacity, which was beneficial for the application of RP. In conclusion, UAD treatment is an effective method for maximizing extraction rate, purity and modifying properties of extracted protein.Entities:
Keywords: Extraction; Function; Rice protein; Structure; Ultrasound; α-Amylase degradation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28946500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.08.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrason Sonochem ISSN: 1350-4177 Impact factor: 7.491