Literature DB >> 28945928

Premixed vs basal-bolus insulin regimen in Type 2 diabetes: comparison of clinical outcomes from randomized controlled trials and real-world data.

U Anyanwagu1, J Mamza1, J Gordon1, R Donnelly1, I Idris1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the concordance between data derived from randomized controlled trial (RCT) and real-world estimates of HbA1c and weight change after 24 weeks of initiation of a basal-bolus compared with a premixed insulin regimen in people with Type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: Data eight RCTs were pooled after a systematic review of studies examining basal-bolus (n = 1893) or premixed (n = 1517) regimens. Real-world data were extracted from the UK primary care dataset for people on basal-bolus (n = 7483) or premixed insulin regimens (n=10 744). The mean differences between HbA1c and weight from baseline were calculated using t-tests, while analysis of variance was used to compare the two treatment regimens. Linear regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of this change.
RESULTS: Both insulin regimens were associated with HbA1c reductions (real-world data -0.28%; RCT data, -1.4%) and weight gain (real-world data, +0.27 kg; RCT data, +2.96 kg) but there were no significant differences between basal-bolus and premixed insulin. Discordances in the pattern of treatment response were observed, however, between real-world and RCT data for both insulin regimens. For any given baseline HbA1c concentration, the change in HbA1c in the RCTs was greater than in real-world conditions and for those with baseline weight above ~60 kg, RCT data showed overall weight gain in contrast to slight weight loss in the real-world population. Lastly, for both randomized controlled trial and real-world populations, while greater baseline weight was associated with reduced response to treatment, the association was much steeper in the RCT than in the real-world population. In addition, greater baseline weight was associated with greater weight reductions in both premixed insulin and basal-bolus insulin regimens, although to a lesser extent with the latter.
CONCLUSION: These results highlight specific discrepancies in the HbA1c reduction and weight change in insulin regimen between real world versus RCT populations; with greater reduction in HbA1c and greater increase in weight observed in the RCT population than in the real-world population. Also, the basal-bolus regimens in both real-world and RCT populations showed greater reduction in HbA1c compared to the premix regimen (though more marked in RCTs), while the premix regimen showed greater increase in weight in real-world, as against basal-bolus in the RCT population.
© 2017 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28945928     DOI: 10.1111/dme.13518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  9 in total

1.  Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms.

Authors:  Riaz Qureshi; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Tianjing Li
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 7.407

2.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  High level of clinical inertia in insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes across Central and South-Eastern Europe: insights from SITIP study.

Authors:  Matthew D Campbell; Drazen Babic; Uros Bolcina; Lea Smirčić-Duvnjak; Tsvetalina Tankova; Asimina Mitrakou; Peter Kempler; Andrej Janez
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  A single-dose euglycaemic clamp study in two cohorts to compare the exposure of SAR341402 (insulin aspart) Mix 70/30 with US- and European-approved versions of insulin aspart Mix 70/30 and SAR341402 rapid-acting solution in subjects with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Christoph Kapitza; Leszek Nosek; Wolfgang Schmider; Lenore Teichert; Bhaswati Mukherjee; Irene Nowotny
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 6.577

5.  Comparison of Prevailing Insulin Regimens at Different Time Periods in Hospitalized Patients: A Real-World Experience from a Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Sun Joon Moon; Hun Jee Choe; Soo Heon Kwak; Hye Seung Jung; Kyong Soo Park; Young Min Cho
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.893

6.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: comparison of results from randomized controlled trials and real-world data.

Authors:  Dandan Wang; Litao Huang; Yuhui Zhang; Zeyi Cheng; Xin Zhang; Pengwei Ren; Qi Hong; Deying Kang
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-01

7.  Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Favorable Glycemic Control with Once-Daily Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart after Changing from Basal Insulin in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Han Na Jang; Ye Seul Yang; Seong Ok Lee; Tae Jung Oh; Bo Kyung Koo; Hye Seung Jung
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2019-12

9.  Low fasting glucose-to-estimated average glucose ratio was associated with superior response to insulin degludec/aspart compared with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Han Na Jang; Ye Seul Yang; Tae Jung Oh; Bo Kyung Koo; Seong Ok Lee; Kyong Soo Park; Hak Chul Jang; Hye Seung Jung
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.232

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.