Literature DB >> 28944952

Bypassing agent prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors.

Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha1, Sarah J Nevitt, Mindy L Simpson, Maissaa Janbain, Barbara A Konkle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors are at high risk of bleeding complications. Infusion of bypassing agents, such as recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) and plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate, are suggested as alternative therapies to factor VIII (haemophilia A) or IX (haemophilia B) for individuals who no longer respond to these treatments because they develop inhibitory antibodies. The ultimate goal of treatment is to preserve the individual's joints, otherwise destroyed by recurrent bleeds.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of bypassing agent prophylaxis to prevent bleeding in people with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched for relevant studies from the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched trial registries (16 February 2017) and bibliographic references of retrieved studies were reviewed for potential articles to be included in the review.Date of the last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Coagulopathies Trials Register: 12 December 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled studies (cross-over or parallel design) evaluating the effect of prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents compared with on-demand treatment, or studies evaluating the effects of high-dose compared with low-dose prophylaxis in males of any age with hemophilia with inhibitors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias according to standard Cochrane criteria. They assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria. MAIN
RESULTS: We included four randomized studies (duration 7 to 15 months) involving 116 males. Risk of bias was judged to be high in two studies due to the open-label study design and in one study due to attrition bias.Two studies compared on-demand treatment to prophylaxis with bypassing agents. In one study (34 males) prophylaxis significantly reduced mean overall bleeding rates, MD - 7.27 (95% CI -9.92 to -4.62) (low quality evidence), mean number of overall bleeding events per month, MD -1.10 (95% CI -1.54 to -0.66), mean number of hemarthrosis, MD -6.60 (95% CI -9.32 to -3.88) (low quality evidence) and mean number of joints that had hemarthrosis, MD -0.90 (95% CI -1.36 to -0.44). The meta-analysis did not conclusively demonstrate significant benefit of prophylaxis on health-related quality of life as measured by Haem-A-QoL score, EQ-5D total score and utility score, EQ-5D VAS and SF-36 physical summary and mental summary score (low quality evidence for all health-related quality of life analyses).The remaining two studies compared dose regimens. The results from one study (22 males) did not conclusively demonstrate benefit or harm of high-dose versus low-dose recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) as a prophylaxis for overall bleeding rate, MD -0.82 (95% CI -2.27 to 0.63) (moderate quality evidence), target joint bleeding rate, MD -3.20 (95% CI -7.23 to 0.83) (moderate quality evidence) and serious adverse events, RR 9.00 (95% CI, 0.54 to 149.50) (moderate quality evidence).The overall quality of evidence was moderate to low due to imprecision from limited information provided by studies with small sample sizes and incomplete outcome data in one study. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that prophylaxis with bypassing agents may be effective in reducing bleeding in males with hemophilia with inhibitors. However, there is a lack of evidence for the superiority of one agent over the other or for the optimum dosage regimen. Further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits and harms of prophylaxis treatment on health-related quality of life, as well as the effects of dose of bypassing agents on the outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28944952      PMCID: PMC6483761          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011441.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  4 in total

1.  Pro- and anticoagulant factors facilitate thrombin generation and balance the haemostatic response to FEIBA(®) in prophylactic therapy.

Authors:  K Varadi; S Tangada; M Loeschberger; P Montsch; G Schrenk; B Ewenstein; P L Turecek
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.287

2.  Anti-inhibitor coagulant complex prophylaxis in hemophilia with inhibitors.

Authors:  Cindy Leissinger; Alessandro Gringeri; Bülent Antmen; Erik Berntorp; Chiara Biasoli; Shannon Carpenter; Paolo Cortesi; Hyejin Jo; Kaan Kavakli; Riitta Lassila; Massimo Morfini; Claude Négrier; Angiola Rocino; Wolfgang Schramm; Margit Serban; Marusia Valentina Uscatescu; Jerzy Windyga; Bülent Zülfikar; Lorenzo Mantovani
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Prophylaxis with anti-inhibitor coagulant complex improves health-related quality of life in haemophilia patients with inhibitors: results from FEIBA NF Prophylaxis Study.

Authors:  O Stasyshyn; S Antunes; V Mamonov; X Ye; J Epstein; Y Xiong; S Tangada
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.287

4.  Randomized, prospective clinical trial of recombinant factor VIIa for secondary prophylaxis in hemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Authors:  B A Konkle; L S Ebbesen; E Erhardtsen; R P Bianco; T Lissitchkov; L Rusen; M A Serban
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.824

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Selective inhibition of activated protein C anticoagulant activity protects against hemophilic arthropathy in mice.

Authors:  Jhansi Magisetty; Vijay Kondreddy; Shiva Keshava; Kaushik Das; Charles T Esmon; Usha R Pendurthi; L Vijaya Mohan Rao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 25.476

2.  EPCR deficiency or function-blocking antibody protects against joint bleeding-induced pathology in hemophilia mice.

Authors:  Jhansi Magisetty; Usha R Pendurthi; Charles T Esmon; L Vijaya Mohan Rao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Gene-based FVIIa prophylaxis modulates the spontaneous bleeding phenotype of hemophilia A rats.

Authors:  Shannon M Zintner; Juliana C Small; Giulia Pavani; Lynn Dankner; Oscar A Marcos-Contreras; Phyllis A Gimotty; Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen; Bo Wiinberg; Paris Margaritis
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-02-12

4.  FVIIa (Factor VIIa) Induces Biased Cytoprotective Signaling in Mice Through the Cleavage of PAR (Protease-Activated Receptor)-1 at Canonical Arg41 (Arginine41) Site.

Authors:  Vijay Kondreddy; Usha R Pendurthi; Xiao Xu; John H Griffin; L Vijaya Mohan Rao
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 5.  Anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) therapy: a novel approach to the treatment of haemophilia.

Authors:  Pratima Chowdary
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Inhibition of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) as a Treatment for Haemophilia: Rationale with Focus on Concizumab.

Authors:  Pratima Chowdary
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.