Andreas S Lappas1,2, Anna S Tzortzi1,3, Efstathia M Konstantinidi1,2, Stephanie I Teloniatis1, Chara K Tzavara4, Sofia A Gennimata5, Nikolaos G Koulouris5, Panagiotis K Behrakis1,2,3. 1. "George D. Behrakis Research Lab" Hellenic Cancer Society, Athens, Greece. 2. Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece. 3. Institute of Public Health, The American College of Greece, Athens, Greece. 4. Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece. 5. Respiratory Function Laboratory, 1st Respiratory Medicine Department, Sotiria General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the duration of immediate respiratory effects of e-cigarette smoking (ECS) and tested the hypothesis that ECS has more prominent effects in asthmatics compared with healthy smokers (HS). METHODS: Fifty-four smokers, 27 healthy (HS group) and 27 with intermittent asthma (mild asthma (MA) group) underwent a control session (no liquid, no resistor coil inside e-cigarette cartridge) and an experimental session of ECS using standardized puffing settings. Impulse oscillometry impedance (Z), resistance (R), reactance (X) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were measured before and 0, 15 and 30 min after control and experimental sessions. RESULTS: Control session revealed no significant changes. In the experimental session, immediately post-ECS, both groups exhibited a significant increase in respiratory system total impedance at 5 Hz (Z5) (P < 0.001), respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz (R5) (P < 0.001), respiratory system resistance at 10 Hz (R10) (P < 0.001), respiratory system resistance at 20 Hz (R20) (P < 0.05), resonant frequency (P < 0.001) and reactance area (P < 0.05). MA exhibited higher baseline values and a more prominent effect immediately after ECS compared with HS for Z5 (P = 0.022), R5 (P = 0.010) and R10 (P = 0.013). FeNO decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.001); HS returned to baseline values in ≤15 min while the MA maintained significantly lower values for an additional 15 min (P < 0.05) and returned to baseline values at 30 min post-ECS. CONCLUSION: A single session of ECS had respiratory mechanical and inflammatory effects, which were more prominent in smokers with asthma.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the duration of immediate respiratory effects of e-cigarette smoking (ECS) and tested the hypothesis that ECS has more prominent effects in asthmatics compared with healthy smokers (HS). METHODS: Fifty-four smokers, 27 healthy (HS group) and 27 with intermittent asthma (mild asthma (MA) group) underwent a control session (no liquid, no resistor coil inside e-cigarette cartridge) and an experimental session of ECS using standardized puffing settings. Impulse oscillometry impedance (Z), resistance (R), reactance (X) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were measured before and 0, 15 and 30 min after control and experimental sessions. RESULTS: Control session revealed no significant changes. In the experimental session, immediately post-ECS, both groups exhibited a significant increase in respiratory system total impedance at 5 Hz (Z5) (P < 0.001), respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz (R5) (P < 0.001), respiratory system resistance at 10 Hz (R10) (P < 0.001), respiratory system resistance at 20 Hz (R20) (P < 0.05), resonant frequency (P < 0.001) and reactance area (P < 0.05). MA exhibited higher baseline values and a more prominent effect immediately after ECS compared with HS for Z5 (P = 0.022), R5 (P = 0.010) and R10 (P = 0.013). FeNO decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.001); HS returned to baseline values in ≤15 min while the MA maintained significantly lower values for an additional 15 min (P < 0.05) and returned to baseline values at 30 min post-ECS. CONCLUSION: A single session of ECS had respiratory mechanical and inflammatory effects, which were more prominent in smokers with asthma.
Authors: Dongmei Li; Isaac K Sundar; Scott McIntosh; Deborah J Ossip; Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Richard J O'Connor; Irfan Rahman Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Devika R Rao; Kendra L Maple; Amy Dettori; Folashade Afolabi; Jenny K R Francis; Maddy Artunduaga; Tiffany J Lieu; Kim Aldy; Dazhe James Cao; Stephanie Hsu; Sing Yi Feng; Vineeta Mittal Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sukirth M Ganesan; Shareef M Dabdoub; Haikady N Nagaraja; Michelle L Scott; Surya Pamulapati; Micah L Berman; Peter G Shields; Mary Ellen Wewers; Purnima S Kumar Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: David G Chapman; Dylan T Casey; Jennifer L Ather; Minara Aliyeva; Nirav Daphtary; Karolyn G Lahue; Jos L van der Velden; Yvonne M W Janssen-Heininger; Charles G Irvin Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 4.379