| Literature DB >> 28944526 |
Rajiv Sharma1, Sarah Tinkler1, Arnab Mitra1, Sudeshna Pal1, Raven Susu-Mago1, Miron Stano2.
Abstract
Medicaid and uninsured patients are disadvantaged in access to care and are disproportionately Black and Hispanic. Using a national audit of primary care physicians, we examine the relationship between state Medicaid fees for primary care services and access for Medicaid, Medicare, uninsured, and privately insured patients who differ by race/ethnicity and sex. We found that states with higher Medicaid fees had higher probabilities of appointment offers and shorter wait times for Medicaid patients, and lower probabilities of appointment offers and longer wait times for uninsured patients. Appointment offers and wait times for Medicare and privately insured patients were unaffected by Medicaid fees. At mean state Medicaid fees, our analysis predicts a 27-percentage-point disadvantage for Medicaid versus Medicare in appointment offers. This decreases to 6 percentage points when Medicaid and Medicare fees are equal, suggesting that permanent fee parity with Medicare could eliminate most of the disparity in appointment offers for Medicaid patients. The predicted decrease in the disparity is smaller for Black and Hispanic patients than for White patients. Our research highlights the importance of considering the effects of policy on nontarget patient groups, and the consequences of seemingly race-neutral policies on racial/ethnic and sex-based disparities.Entities:
Keywords: Medicaid; access to primary care; health care disparities; simulated patients; uninsured
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28944526 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Econ ISSN: 1057-9230 Impact factor: 3.046