Nathan Messas1,2, Marie-Pierre Dubé1,3, Jean-Claude Tardif4,5. 1. Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada. 2. Pôle d'Activité Médico-Chirurgicale Cardio-Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France. 3. Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada. jean-claude.tardif@icm-mhi.org. 5. Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. jean-claude.tardif@icm-mhi.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High-density lipoproteins (HDL) are involved in reverse cholesterol transport. Results from randomized trials of HDL-targeting therapies, including cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, have shown a lack of benefit in unsegmented populations. These observations could be explained by inter-individual variability of clinical responses to such agents depending on the patients' genotypes. In parallel, although lowering of LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) with statin therapy reduces the risk of vascular events in a wide range of individuals, inter-individual variability exists with regard to LDL-c-lowering response as well as efficacy in reducing major cardiovascular events. RECENT FINDINGS: Pharmacogenomic analyses were performed in the dal-OUTCOMES and dal-PLAQUE-2 studies. Beneficial and concordant results were observed in patients with the favorable genotype when treated with the CETP inhibitor dalcetrapib. Similarly, previous studies revealed genetic variants associated with differential LDL-c response to statin therapy. In this review, we discuss the pharmacogenetic determinants of HDL-targeting and statin therapy responses in light of the latest available published data, and their potential therapeutic applications.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High-density lipoproteins (HDL) are involved in reverse cholesterol transport. Results from randomized trials of HDL-targeting therapies, including cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, have shown a lack of benefit in unsegmented populations. These observations could be explained by inter-individual variability of clinical responses to such agents depending on the patients' genotypes. In parallel, although lowering of LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) with statin therapy reduces the risk of vascular events in a wide range of individuals, inter-individual variability exists with regard to LDL-c-lowering response as well as efficacy in reducing major cardiovascular events. RECENT FINDINGS: Pharmacogenomic analyses were performed in the dal-OUTCOMES and dal-PLAQUE-2 studies. Beneficial and concordant results were observed in patients with the favorable genotype when treated with the CETP inhibitor dalcetrapib. Similarly, previous studies revealed genetic variants associated with differential LDL-c response to statin therapy. In this review, we discuss the pharmacogenetic determinants of HDL-targeting and statin therapy responses in light of the latest available published data, and their potential therapeutic applications.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiovascular disease; Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors; High-density lipoproteins (HDL); Pharmacogenetics; Statins
Authors: Jean-Claude Tardif; Eric Rhéaume; Louis-Philippe Lemieux Perreault; Jean C Grégoire; Yassamin Feroz Zada; Géraldine Asselin; Sylvie Provost; Amina Barhdadi; David Rhainds; Philippe L L'Allier; Reda Ibrahim; Ruchi Upmanyu; Eric J Niesor; Renée Benghozi; Gabriela Suchankova; Fouzia Laghrissi-Thode; Marie-Claude Guertin; Anders G Olsson; Ian Mongrain; Gregory G Schwartz; Marie-Pierre Dubé Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2015-01-11
Authors: Anders G Olsson; Gregory G Schwartz; Michael Szarek; William J Sasiela; Michael D Ezekowitz; Peter Ganz; Michael F Oliver; David Waters; Andreas Zeiher Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-03-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: William E Boden; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Todd Anderson; Bernard R Chaitman; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens; Kent Koprowicz; Ruth McBride; Koon Teo; William Weintraub Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip J Barter; Mark Caulfield; Mats Eriksson; Scott M Grundy; John J P Kastelein; Michel Komajda; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Lori Mosca; Jean-Claude Tardif; David D Waters; Charles L Shear; James H Revkin; Kevin A Buhr; Marian R Fisher; Alan R Tall; Bryan Brewer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander Thompson; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Nadeem Sarwar; Sebhat Erqou; Danish Saleheen; Robin P F Dullaart; Bernard Keavney; Zheng Ye; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J L Mega; N O Stitziel; S Kathiresan; M S Sabatine; J G Smith; D I Chasman; M Caulfield; J J Devlin; F Nordio; C Hyde; C P Cannon; F Sacks; N Poulter; P Sever; P M Ridker; E Braunwald; O Melander Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321