Literature DB >> 28944349

Toward Mixed Method Evaluations of Scientific Visualizations and Design Process as an Evaluation Tool.

Bret Jackson1, Dane Coffey1, Lauren Thorson1,2, David Schroeder1, Arin M Ellingson3, David J Nuckley3,4, Daniel F Keefe1.   

Abstract

In this position paper we discuss successes and limitations of current evaluation strategies for scientific visualizations and argue for embracing a mixed methods strategy of evaluation. The most novel contribution of the approach that we advocate is a new emphasis on employing design processes as practiced in related fields (e.g., graphic design, illustration, architecture) as a formalized mode of evaluation for data visualizations. To motivate this position we describe a series of recent evaluations of scientific visualization interfaces and computer graphics strategies conducted within our research group. Complementing these more traditional evaluations our visualization research group also regularly employs sketching, critique, and other design methods that have been formalized over years of practice in design fields. Our experience has convinced us that these activities are invaluable, often providing much more detailed evaluative feedback about our visualization systems than that obtained via more traditional user studies and the like. We believe that if design-based evaluation methodologies (e.g., ideation, sketching, critique) can be taught and embraced within the visualization community then these may become one of the most effective future strategies for both formative and summative evaluations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Design; Evaluation; Visualization

Year:  2012        PMID: 28944349      PMCID: PMC5607956          DOI: 10.1145/2442576.2442580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc 2012 BELIV Workshop (2012)


  7 in total

1.  Interactive slice WIM: navigating and interrogating volume data sets using a multisurface, multitouch VR interface.

Authors:  Dane Coffey; Nicholas Malbraaten; Trung Bao Le; Iman Borazjani; Fotis Sotiropoulos; Arthur G Erdman; Daniel F Keefe
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  FI3D: direct-touch interaction for the exploration of 3D scientific visualization spaces.

Authors:  Lingyun Yu; Pjotr Svetachov; Petra Isenberg; Maarten H Everts; Tobias Isenberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.579

3.  An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations.

Authors:  Purvi Saraiya; Chris North; Karen Duca
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.579

4.  Artistic collaboration in designing VR visualizations.

Authors:  Daniel F Keefe; David B Karelitz; Eileen L Vote; David H Laidlaw
Journal:  IEEE Comput Graph Appl       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.088

5.  Scientific sketching for collaborative VR visualization design.

Authors:  Daniel F Keefe; Daniel Acevedo; Jadrian Miles; Fritz Drury; Sharon M Swartz; David H Laidlaw
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.579

6.  Using visual design experts in critique-based evaluation of 2D vector visualization methods.

Authors:  Daniel Acevedo; Cullen D Jackson; Fritz Drury; David H Laidlaw
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.579

7.  Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics.

Authors:  H J Woltring; R Huiskes; A de Lange; F E Veldpaus
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Trend-Centric Motion Visualization: Designing and Applying a New Strategy for Analyzing Scientific Motion Collections.

Authors:  David Schroeder; Fedor Korsakov; Carissa Mai-Ping Knipe; Lauren Thorson; Arin M Ellingson; David Nuckley; John Carlis; Daniel F Keefe
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.579

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.