| Literature DB >> 28943764 |
Eun Ji Choi1, Hae Woong Park1, Hui Seon Yang1, Jin Se Kim2, Ho Hyun Chun1.
Abstract
Quality characteristics of frozen cylindrical pork loin were evaluated following different tempering methods: 27.12 MHz curved-electrode radio frequency (RF) at 1000 and 1500 W, and forced-air convection (FC) or water immersion (WI) at 4°C and 20°C. The developed RF tempering system with the newly designed curved-electrode achieved relatively uniform tempering compared to a parallel-plate RF system. FC tempering at 4°C was the most time-consuming process, whereas 1500 W RF was the shortest. Pork sample drip loss, water holding capacity, color, and microbiological quality declined after WI tempering at 20°C. Conversely, RF tempering yielded minimal sample changes in drip loss, microstructure, color, and total aerobic bacteria counts, along with relatively uniform internal sample temperature distributions compared to those of the other tempering treatments. These results indicate that curved-electrode RF tempering could be used to provide rapid defrosting with minimal quality deterioration of cylindrical frozen meat block products.Entities:
Keywords: freezing; pork loin; quality; radio frequency; tempering
Year: 2017 PMID: 28943764 PMCID: PMC5599572 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.4.518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Fig. 1.Photographic comparisons of pork loin samples subjected to curved-electrode (top) and parallel-electrode (bottom) radio frequency (RF) tempering systems at 1000 W for 10 min and 1500 W for 5 min.
Fig. 2.Tempering time-temperature profiles of cylindrical frozen pork loin samples subjected to curved-electrode and parallel-electrode radio frequency (RF) tempering systems at 1,000 W for 10 min and 1,500 W for 5 min.
Fig. 3.Tempering time-temperature profiles of cylindrical frozen pork loin samples under conventional tempering conditions.
Change in tempering rate, drip loss, cooking loss, and water holding capacity of cylindrical pork loin treated with different tempering conditions
| Parameter | Tempering treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | FC | WI | Curved-electrode RF | ||||
| 4°C | 20°C | 4°C | 20°C | 1000 W | 1500 W | ||
| Tempering rate (°C/min) | - | 0.03±0.01c1 | 0.08±0.02c | 0.11±0.03c | 0.23±0.03c | 2.04±0.30b | 4.18±1.50a |
| Drip loss (%) | - | 1.88±0.32bcd | 2.14±0.26bc | 2.83±0.99b | 6.33±2.22a | 0.16±0.03d | 0.46±0.21cd |
| Cooking loss (%) | 28.03±1.67c | 33.50±0.50a | 31.67±1.46ab | 31.93±2.51ab | 29.90±0.56bc | 31.93±1.17ab | 32.30±2.5ab |
| Water holding capacity | 70.89±2.52a | 66.11±4.88b | 57.86±1.95d | 65.78±2.27b | 60.00±3.24cd | 65.56±0.84b | 64.56±1.17bc |
1Mean values in the same row (a-d) followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan's multiple range test (p<0.05). FC, forced-air convection; WI, water immersion; RF, radio frequency.
Change in pH, VBN, and TBARS of cylindrical pork loin treated with different thawing conditions
| Parameter | Thawing treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | FC | WI | Curved-electrode RF | ||||
| 4°C | 20°C | 4°C | 20°C | 1000 W | 1500 W | ||
| pH | 5.90±0.09 | 5.83±0.11 | 5.86±0.13 | 5.80±0.09 | 5.94±0.16 | 5.83±0.08 | 5.74±0.11 |
| VBN (mg N/100 g) | 12.08±1.66ab1 | 10.79±0.21bc | 10.06±0.31c | 11.49±1.22bc | 13.39±1.43a | 10.30±0.35bc | 10.80±0.26bc |
| TBARS (mg malonaldehyde/kg) | 0.04±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.04±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.05±0.01 | 0.05±0.03 | 0.05±0.02 |
1Mean values in the same row (a-c) followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan's multiple range test (p<0.05).
VBN, volatile base nitrogen; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance; FC, forced-air convection; WI, water immersion; RF, radio frequency.
Changes in Hunter color values of cylindrical frozen pork loin treated with different tempering conditions
| Color parameter | Tempering treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | FC | WI | Curved-electrode RF | ||||
| 4°C | 20°C | 4°C | 20°C | 1000 W | 1500 W | ||
| Hunter L* | 44.97±2.85 | 43.65±2.76 | 45.68±1.28 | 42.97±0.89 | 42.26±2.43 | 44.02±1.39 | 44.49±2.43 |
| a* | 7.60±0.96ab1 | 6.87±1.13abc | 5.69±0.87c | 6.31±0.85bc | 5.55±0.82c | 7.59±0.92ab | 8.44±1.12a |
| b* | 3.19±0.81ab | 2.15±1.05bc | 2.75±0.97ab | 1.07±0.42c | 1.06±0.52c | 3.84±1.21a | 2.98±0.83ab |
| ΔE* | - | 3.01±1.81ab | 2.56±0.70ab | 3.27±0.80ab | 5.10±1.38a | 2.33±1.13b | 2.34±1.76b |
1Mean values in the same row (a-c) followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan's multiple range test (p<0.05). FC, forced-air convection; WI, water immersion; RF, radio frequency.
Fig. 4.Internal thermal distributions within cylindrical pork loins after forced-air convection (FC), water immersion (WI), and curved-electrode radio frequency (RF) tempering captured by an infrared camera.
Changes in number, diameter, and area of the intracellular space of the cylindrical frozen pork loin microstructure exposed to different tempering treatments
| Intracellular space parameter | Tempering treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | FC | WI | Curved-electrode RF | ||||
| 4°C | 20°C | 4°C | 20°C | 1000 W | 1500 W | ||
| Number | - | 4.80±0.92b1 | 6.70±1.34a | 6.60±1.51a | 6.20±1.55a | 1.60±1.07c | 2.20±0.92c |
| Diameter (μm) | - | 34.12±8.62ab | 28.17±8.80b | 35.11±9.34a | 20.92±3.41c | 17.14±3.64c | 20.27±4.85c |
| Area (μm2) | - | 338.32±89.88a | 258.11±39.61b | 367.27±92.25a | 171.26±56.54c | 119.85±26.87c | 138.01±45.87c |
1Mean values in the same row (a-c) followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan's multiple range test (p<0.05). FC, forced-air convection; WI, water immersion; RF, radio frequency.
Changes in the counts (Log CFU/g) of pre-existing microorganisms of frozen pork loin treated with different tempering conditions
| Microorganisms | Tempering treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | FC | WI | Curved-electrode RF | ||||
| 4°C | 20°C | 4°C | 20°C | 1000 W | 1500 W | ||
| Total aerobic bacteria | 3.35±0.21c1 | 2.80±0.17de | 3.72±0.20b | 3.82±0.11ab | 4.07±0.18a | 3.04±0.23cd | 2.62±0.10e |
| Coliforms | 1.68±0.24 | N/D2 | 1.48±0.21 | N/D | 1.67±0.19 | N/D | N/D |
| Yeast and molds | 3.95±0.25 | 4.12±0.18 | 3.98±0.29 | 3.82±0.25 | 4.13±0.13 | 4.01±0.15 | 3.98±0.24 |
1Mean values in the same row (a-e) followed by different letters are significantly different according to Duncan's multiple range test (p<0.05).
2N/D: Not detected (<1 Log CFU/g). FC, forced-air convection; WI, water immersion; RF, radio frequency.