Literature DB >> 28943318

A qualitative study showing women's participation and empowerment in instrumental vaginal births.

Marie Sjödin1, Ingela Rådestad2, Sofia Zwedberg3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An instrumental birth with a ventouse or forceps is a complicated birth, possibly resulting in fear of childbirth which could influence the entire birth experience negatively. Patients who are actively involved in their care have a stronger sense of satisfaction and a sense of participation can contribute to shorter hospital stays. AIM: To describe the experience of participation for women involved in an instrumental delivery with ventouse or forceps.
METHOD: Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 16 women who gave birth aided by a ventouse or forceps. Their answers were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. In addition the women were asked to evaluate their experience during the delivery. Using a numerical scale (NRS) the birth experience was graded by choosing a number between 0 (worst possible experience) and 10 (best conceivable experience).
FINDINGS: Two themes were extracted from the data: To be part of a team and To feel empowered. Five categories were identified from the women's descriptions of the experience of involvement during the instrumental delivery: to cooperate; to understand; to have contact; to participate, and to not be involved. Those women who rated their experience as low grade, described a lack of involvement in their childbirth compared to those women who rated their experience as high.
CONCLUSION: This study shows how cooperation and empowerment of the woman are two key factors in order for the women to have a positive experience of their instrumental vaginal births. The study also shows that empowerment is created when the woman is actively engaged and participates in the birth process which gives her the feeling of being part of the team, creating an environment based on mutual understanding.
Copyright © 2017 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obstetrical forceps; Patient participation; Professional–patient relation; Qualitative content analysis; Vacuum extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28943318     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  2 in total

1.  Women's, partners' and healthcare providers' views and experiences of assisted vaginal birth: a systematic mixed methods review.

Authors:  Nicola Crossland; Carol Kingdon; Marie-Clare Balaam; Ana Pilar Betrán; Soo Downe
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Psychosocial factors that mediate the association between mode of birth and maternal postnatal adjustment: findings from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Fiona Alderdice; Jane Henderson; Charles Opondo; Marci Lobel; Maria Quigley; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.