OBJECTIVES: To explore the feasibility of a new quantitative method for microvascular function: non-invasive retinal function imaging (RFI). in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and healthy controls and have it benchmarked against Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) measurements. METHODS: The variability of Microvascular measurements was assessed in 8 SCD patients and 8 healthy matched controls. Measurements were conducted twice on two different study days. RFI was performed for assessment of arterial and venous retinal blood flow. LSCI measurements included post occlusive reactive hyperemia and IBH challenges. Measured variables included basal flow, flow upon occlusion-reperfusion and flow during an IBH. RESULTS: RFI arterial flow and venous flow and LSCI basal flow and peak flow showed excellent intra subject repeatability between days (CVC of 8.5% 9.5%, 7.6% and 7.7% respectively) and between measurements on one day (CVC of 7.0%, 7.7%, 7.6% and 4.7% respectively). RFI arterial flow (p<0.002), and RFI venous flow (p=0.007) differed significantly between SCD patients and controls in as did LSCI basal flow, maximal flow and delta flow during IBH (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RFI showed low variability for all readout measures, comparable with most microvascular measures from LSCI. The discriminating power of the RFI between SCD patients and controls demonstrate the feasibility of this device for quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in clinical research.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the feasibility of a new quantitative method for microvascular function: non-invasive retinal function imaging (RFI). in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and healthy controls and have it benchmarked against Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) measurements. METHODS: The variability of Microvascular measurements was assessed in 8 SCDpatients and 8 healthy matched controls. Measurements were conducted twice on two different study days. RFI was performed for assessment of arterial and venous retinal blood flow. LSCI measurements included post occlusive reactive hyperemia and IBH challenges. Measured variables included basal flow, flow upon occlusion-reperfusion and flow during an IBH. RESULTS: RFI arterial flow and venous flow and LSCI basal flow and peak flow showed excellent intra subject repeatability between days (CVC of 8.5% 9.5%, 7.6% and 7.7% respectively) and between measurements on one day (CVC of 7.0%, 7.7%, 7.6% and 4.7% respectively). RFI arterial flow (p<0.002), and RFI venous flow (p=0.007) differed significantly between SCDpatients and controls in as did LSCI basal flow, maximal flow and delta flow during IBH (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RFI showed low variability for all readout measures, comparable with most microvascular measures from LSCI. The discriminating power of the RFI between SCDpatients and controls demonstrate the feasibility of this device for quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in clinical research.
Authors: W A J Birkhoff; L van Manen; J Dijkstra; M L De Kam; J C van Meurs; A F Cohen Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Mahnaz Shahidi; Anthony E Felder; Ou Tan; Norman P Blair; David Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Willem A J Birkhoff; Jules A A C Heuberger; Titiaan E Post; Pim Gal; Frederik E Stuurman; Jacobus Burggraaf; Adam F Cohen Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2018-12