N Guberina1, U Dietrich2, D Arweiler-Harbeck3, M Forsting2, A Ringelstein2. 1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Electronic address: nika.guberina@uk-essen.de. 2. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine radiation-doses imparted during multislice (MSCT) and cone-beam computed-tomography (CBCT) for perioperative examination of cochlear-implant insertion. METHODS: Radiation-doses were assessed during standardized petrous-bone CT-protocols at different MSCT ((I) single-source CT-scanner Somatom-Definition-AS+, (II) 2nd generation of dual-source CT-scanner Somatom-Definition-Flash, (III) 3rd generation of dual-source CT-scanner Somatom-Force and at the CBCT Ziehm-Vision-RFD3D ((IV) (a) RFD-3D (Standard-modifier), (b) RFD-3D (Low-dose-modifier)). Image quality was examined by two radiologists appraising electrode-array placement, quality-control of cochlear-implant surgery and complications based on real patients' examinations (n=78). RESULTS: In MSCT-setting following radiation-doses were assessed (CTDIw; DLP): (I) 21.5mGy; 216mGycm; (II) 19.7mGy; 195mGycm; (III) 12.7mGy; 127mGycm; in the CBCT setting radiation doses were distributed as follows: (IV) (a) 1.9mGy; 19.4mGycm; (b) 1.2mGy; 12.9mGycm. Overall, image quality was evaluated as good for both, MSCT- and CBCT-examinations, with a good interrater reliability (r=0.81). CONCLUSION: CBCT bears considerable dose-saving potential for the perioperative examination of cochlear-implant insertion while maintaining adequate image quality.
PURPOSE: To examine radiation-doses imparted during multislice (MSCT) and cone-beam computed-tomography (CBCT) for perioperative examination of cochlear-implant insertion. METHODS: Radiation-doses were assessed during standardized petrous-bone CT-protocols at different MSCT ((I) single-source CT-scanner Somatom-Definition-AS+, (II) 2nd generation of dual-source CT-scanner Somatom-Definition-Flash, (III) 3rd generation of dual-source CT-scanner Somatom-Force and at the CBCT Ziehm-Vision-RFD3D ((IV) (a) RFD-3D (Standard-modifier), (b) RFD-3D (Low-dose-modifier)). Image quality was examined by two radiologists appraising electrode-array placement, quality-control of cochlear-implant surgery and complications based on real patients' examinations (n=78). RESULTS: In MSCT-setting following radiation-doses were assessed (CTDIw; DLP): (I) 21.5mGy; 216mGycm; (II) 19.7mGy; 195mGycm; (III) 12.7mGy; 127mGycm; in the CBCT setting radiation doses were distributed as follows: (IV) (a) 1.9mGy; 19.4mGycm; (b) 1.2mGy; 12.9mGycm. Overall, image quality was evaluated as good for both, MSCT- and CBCT-examinations, with a good interrater reliability (r=0.81). CONCLUSION: CBCT bears considerable dose-saving potential for the perioperative examination of cochlear-implant insertion while maintaining adequate image quality.
Authors: R A Helal; R Jacob; M A Elshinnawy; A I Othman; I M Al-Dhamari; D W Paulus; T T Abdelaziz Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Felix Eisenhut; Lava Taha; Michael Manhart; Vivian Thimsen; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Heinrich Iro; Joachim Hornung; Arnd Dörfler; Stefan Lang Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 2.995
Authors: Yashar Naseri; Ulrich Hubbe; Christoph Scholz; Johannes Brönner; Marie T Krüger; Jan-Helge Klingler Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 1.930