Christos Tsiokos1, Mahsa Malekmohammadi2, Nicholas AuYong2, Nader Pouratian3. 1. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: npouratian@mednet.ucla.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent discoveries suggest that it is most likely the coupling of β oscillations (13-30Hz) and not merely their power that relates to Parkinson disease (PD) pathophysiology. METHODS: We analyzed power and phase amplitude coupling (PAC) in local field potentials (LFP) recorded from Pallidum after placement of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads in nineteen PD patients and three patients with dystonia. RESULTS: Within GPi, we identified PAC between phase of β and amplitude of high frequency oscillations (200-300Hz) and distinct β-low γ (40-80Hz) PAC both modulated by contralateral movement. Resting β-low γ PAC, also present in dystonia patients, inversely correlated with severity of rigidity and bradykinesia (R=-0.44, P=0.028). These findings were specific to the low β band, suggesting a differential role for the two β sub-bands. CONCLUSIONS: PAC is present across distinct frequency bands within the GPi. Given the presence of low β-low γ PAC in dystonia and the inverse correlation with symptom severity, we propose that this PAC may be a normal pallidal signal. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides new evidence on the pathophysiological contribution of local pallidal coupling and suggests similar and distinct patterns of coupling within GPi and STN in PD.
OBJECTIVE: Recent discoveries suggest that it is most likely the coupling of β oscillations (13-30Hz) and not merely their power that relates to Parkinson disease (PD) pathophysiology. METHODS: We analyzed power and phase amplitude coupling (PAC) in local field potentials (LFP) recorded from Pallidum after placement of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads in nineteen PDpatients and three patients with dystonia. RESULTS: Within GPi, we identified PAC between phase of β and amplitude of high frequency oscillations (200-300Hz) and distinct β-low γ (40-80Hz) PAC both modulated by contralateral movement. Resting β-low γ PAC, also present in dystoniapatients, inversely correlated with severity of rigidity and bradykinesia (R=-0.44, P=0.028). These findings were specific to the low β band, suggesting a differential role for the two β sub-bands. CONCLUSIONS:PAC is present across distinct frequency bands within the GPi. Given the presence of low β-low γ PAC in dystonia and the inverse correlation with symptom severity, we propose that this PAC may be a normal pallidal signal. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides new evidence on the pathophysiological contribution of local pallidal coupling and suggests similar and distinct patterns of coupling within GPi and STN in PD.
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mark W Woolrich; Saad Jbabdi; Brian Patenaude; Michael Chappell; Salima Makni; Timothy Behrens; Christian Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-11-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kenneth A Follett; Frances M Weaver; Matthew Stern; Kwan Hur; Crystal L Harris; Ping Luo; William J Marks; Johannes Rothlind; Oren Sagher; Claudia Moy; Rajesh Pahwa; Kim Burchiel; Penelope Hogarth; Eugene C Lai; John E Duda; Kathryn Holloway; Ali Samii; Stacy Horn; Jeff M Bronstein; Gatana Stoner; Philip A Starr; Richard Simpson; Gordon Baltuch; Antonio De Salles; Grant D Huang; Domenic J Reda Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrea L Crowell; Elena S Ryapolova-Webb; Jill L Ostrem; Nicholas B Galifianakis; Shoichi Shimamoto; Daniel A Lim; Philip A Starr Journal: Brain Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Bernadette C M van Wijk; Martijn Beudel; Ashwani Jha; Ashwini Oswal; Tom Foltynie; Marwan I Hariz; Patricia Limousin; Ludvic Zrinzo; Tipu Z Aziz; Alexander L Green; Peter Brown; Vladimir Litvak Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Robert S Eisinger; Jackson N Cagle; Enrico Opri; Jose Alcantara; Stephanie Cernera; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun; Aysegul Gunduz Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Doris D Wang; Coralie de Hemptinne; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Jill L Ostrem; Nicholas B Galifianakis; Marta San Luciano; Philip A Starr Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Luke A Johnson; Joshua E Aman; Ying Yu; David Escobar Sanabria; Jing Wang; Meghan Hill; Rajiv Dharnipragada; Remi Patriat; Mark Fiecas; Laura Li; Lauren E Schrock; Scott E Cooper; Matthew D Johnson; Michael C Park; Noam Harel; Jerrold L Vitek Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 9.698
Authors: Roberto Martin Del Campo-Vera; Austin M Tang; Angad S Gogia; Kuang-Hsuan Chen; Rinu Sebastian; Zachary D Gilbert; George Nune; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee Journal: Neuromodulation Date: 2021-07-05
Authors: Ka Loong Kelvin Au; Joshua K Wong; Takashi Tsuboi; Robert S Eisinger; Kathryn Moore; Janine Lemos Melo Lobo Jofili Lopes; Marshall T Holland; Vanessa M Holanda; Zhongxing Peng-Chen; Addie Patterson; Kelly D Foote; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Michael S Okun; Leonardo Almeida Journal: Neurol Ther Date: 2020-11-02