Literature DB >> 28941898

Interlaboratory validation of an improved method for detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in produce using a real-time PCR assay.

Helen R Murphy1, Hediye Nese Cinar2, Gopal Gopinath2, Kathy E Noe3, Lacresha D Chatman3, Nancy E Miranda3, June H Wetherington4, Jason Neal-McKinney5, Gabrielle S Pires4, Elizabeth Sachs4, Kristopher J Stanya4, Cynthia L Johnson4, Fernanda S Nascimento6, Monica Santin7, Aleksey Molokin7, Mansour Samadpour8, Harish Janagama8, Amy Kahler9, Candace Miller9, Alexandre J da Silva2.   

Abstract

A collaborative validation study was performed to evaluate the performance of a new U.S. Food and Drug Administration method developed for detection of the protozoan parasite, Cyclospora cayetanensis, on cilantro and raspberries. The method includes a sample preparation step in which oocysts are recovered from produce using an enhanced produce washing solution containing 0.1% Alconox and a commercially available method to disrupt the C. cayetanensis oocysts and extract DNA. A real-time PCR assay targeting the C. cayetanensis 18S rDNA gene with an internal amplification control to monitor PCR inhibition provides species-specific identification. Five laboratories blindly analyzed a total of 319 samples consisting of 25 g of cilantro or 50 g of raspberries which were either uninoculated or artificially contaminated with C. cayetanensis oocysts. Detection rates for cilantro inoculated with 200, 10, and 5 oocysts, were 100%, 80%, and 31%, respectively. For raspberries, the detection rates for samples inoculated with 200, 10, and 5 oocysts were 100%, 90% and 50%, respectively. All uninoculated samples, DNA blank extracts, and no-template PCR controls were negative. Reproducibility between laboratories and analysts was high and the method was shown to be an effective analytical tool for detection of C. cayetanensis in produce. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclospora cayetanensis; Detection method; Produce; Real-time PCR; Validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28941898     DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0740-0020            Impact factor:   5.516


  11 in total

1.  Dead-End Ultrafiltration and DNA-Based Methods for Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in Agricultural Water.

Authors:  Mauricio Durigan; Helen R Murphy; Alexandre J da Silva
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Cyclospora cayetanensis and Cyclosporiasis: An Update.

Authors:  Sonia Almeria; Hediye N Cinar; Jitender P Dubey
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-04

3.  Comparison of Three Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in Stool Samples Targeting the 18S rRNA Gene and the hsp70 Gene.

Authors:  Felix Weinreich; Andreas Hahn; Kirsten Alexandra Eberhardt; Torsten Feldt; Fred Stephen Sarfo; Veronica Di Cristanziano; Hagen Frickmann; Ulrike Loderstädt
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-01-26

4.  Dispersal of taeniid eggs: Experimental faecal contamination of forest environment followed by DNA detection in wild berries.

Authors:  Sanna Malkamäki; Antti Oksanen; Anu Näreaho; Antti Sukura
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-04-11

5.  A New Protocol for Molecular Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis as Contaminants of Berry Fruits.

Authors:  Tamirat T Temesgen; Kristoffer R Tysnes; Lucy J Robertson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Molecular typing of Cyclospora cayetanensis in produce and clinical samples using targeted enrichment of complete mitochondrial genomes and next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Hediye Nese Cinar; Gopal Gopinath; Helen R Murphy; Sonia Almeria; Mauricio Durigan; Dajung Choi; AhYoung Jang; Eunje Kim; RaeYoung Kim; Seonju Choi; Jeongu Lee; Yurim Shin; Jieon Lee; Yvonne Qvarnstrom; Theresa K Benedict; Henry S Bishop; Alexandre da Silva
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 7.  Parasite contamination of berries: Risk, occurrence, and approaches for mitigation.

Authors:  Tamirat Tefera; Kristoffer R Tysnes; Kjersti Selstad Utaaker; Lucy J Robertson
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2018-04-21

Review 8.  Advances in Cyclosporiasis Diagnosis and Therapeutic Intervention.

Authors:  Junqiang Li; Zhaohui Cui; Meng Qi; Longxian Zhang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 9.  Life Cycle and Transmission of Cyclospora cayetanensis: Knowns and Unknowns.

Authors:  Jitender P Dubey; Asis Khan; Benjamin M Rosenthal
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-06

10.  Verification and Use of the US-FDA BAM 19b Method for Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in a Survey of Fresh Produce by CFIA Laboratory.

Authors:  Laura Lalonde; Jenna Oakley; Patrick Fries
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.