Julia Anglen Bauer1, Birgit Claus Henn2, Christine Austin3, Silvia Zoni4, Chiara Fedrighi4, Giuseppa Cagna4, Donatella Placidi4, Roberta F White2, Qiong Yang5, Brent A Coull6, Donald Smith7, Roberto G Lucchini8, Robert O Wright3, Manish Arora3. 1. Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: jnab@bu.edu. 2. Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Italy. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA. 8. Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manganese (Mn) is an essential element required for growth and development, but higher body burdens have been associated with neurobehavioral decrements in children. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether prenatal or postnatal Mn measured in deciduous teeth was associated with scores on a test of visuospatial learning and memory. METHODS: Deciduous teeth were collected from 142 participants (ages 10-14years) residing near varied ferro‑manganese industry in Italy. Mn concentrations were measured in prenatal and postnatal tooth regions by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The Virtual Radial Arm Maze (VRAM), an animal-human analogue task, was used to assess visuospatial learning and memory. We used generalized additive, linear and zero-inflated Poisson mixed regression models to estimate associations between prenatal or postnatal Mn concentrations and repeated measures of all four VRAM outcomes: time, distance, working and reference memory errors. Effect measure modification by sex was examined in stratified models. RESULTS: U-shaped associations between prenatal Mn and VRAM outcomes were observed among girls only (pGAMM=0.001 to 0.02 in stratified models). Compared to the mid-tertile of prenatal Mn, girls in the highest tertile took 7.7s [95% CI: -6.1, 21.5] longer to complete the task, traveled 2.3 maze units [0.1, 4.4] farther, and committed more working and reference memory errors (β for count ratio=1.33 [1.01, 1.83]; 1.10 [0.98, 1.24], respectively). This association was not observed among boys. In contrast, for postnatal Mn, no significant associations were found, and patterns were similar for boys and girls. CONCLUSIONS: The prenatal period may be a critical window for the impact of environmental Mn on visuospatial ability and executive function, especially for females.
BACKGROUND:Manganese (Mn) is an essential element required for growth and development, but higher body burdens have been associated with neurobehavioral decrements in children. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether prenatal or postnatal Mn measured in deciduous teeth was associated with scores on a test of visuospatial learning and memory. METHODS: Deciduous teeth were collected from 142 participants (ages 10-14years) residing near varied ferro‑manganese industry in Italy. Mn concentrations were measured in prenatal and postnatal tooth regions by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The Virtual Radial Arm Maze (VRAM), an animal-human analogue task, was used to assess visuospatial learning and memory. We used generalized additive, linear and zero-inflated Poisson mixed regression models to estimate associations between prenatal or postnatal Mn concentrations and repeated measures of all four VRAM outcomes: time, distance, working and reference memory errors. Effect measure modification by sex was examined in stratified models. RESULTS: U-shaped associations between prenatal Mn and VRAM outcomes were observed among girls only (pGAMM=0.001 to 0.02 in stratified models). Compared to the mid-tertile of prenatal Mn, girls in the highest tertile took 7.7s [95% CI: -6.1, 21.5] longer to complete the task, traveled 2.3 maze units [0.1, 4.4] farther, and committed more working and reference memory errors (β for count ratio=1.33 [1.01, 1.83]; 1.10 [0.98, 1.24], respectively). This association was not observed among boys. In contrast, for postnatal Mn, no significant associations were found, and patterns were similar for boys and girls. CONCLUSIONS: The prenatal period may be a critical window for the impact of environmental Mn on visuospatial ability and executive function, especially for females.
Authors: Robert O Wright; Chitra Amarasiriwardena; Alan D Woolf; Rebecca Jim; David C Bellinger Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2005-11-28 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Robert B Gunier; Ana Maria Mora; Donald Smith; Manish Arora; Christine Austin; Brenda Eskenazi; Asa Bradman Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Karin Broberg; Tahir Taj; Stefano Guazzetti; Marco Peli; Giuseppa Cagna; Daniela Pineda; Donatella Placidi; Robert O Wright; Donald R Smith; Roberto G Lucchini; Karin Wahlberg Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-06-22 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Yuri Levin-Schwartz; Chris Gennings; Birgit Claus Henn; Brent A Coull; Donatella Placidi; Roberto Lucchini; Donald R Smith; Robert O Wright Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Z García-Chimalpopoca; D Hernández-Bonilla; M Cortez-Lugo; C Escamilla-Núñez; A Schilmann; H Riojas-Rodríguez; S Rodríguez-Dozal; S Montes; L A Tristán-López; M Catalán-Vázquez; C Rios Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 3.911
Authors: Lisa B Rokoff; Jessica R Shoaff; Brent A Coull; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; David C Bellinger; Susan A Korrick Journal: Environ Res Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Anna V Oppenheimer; David C Bellinger; Brent A Coull; Marc G Weisskopf; Susan A Korrick Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Stephani S Kim; John D Meeker; Rachel Carroll; Shanshan Zhao; Michael J Mourgas; Michael J Richards; Max Aung; David E Cantonwine; Thomas F McElrath; Kelly K Ferguson Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Courtney J Mercadante; Milankumar Prajapati; Heather L Conboy; Miriam E Dash; Carolina Herrera; Michael A Pettiglio; Layra Cintron-Rivera; Madeleine A Salesky; Deepa B Rao; Thomas B Bartnikas Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Jordyn M Wilcox; David C Consoli; Krista C Paffenroth; Brittany D Spitznagel; Erin S Calipari; Aaron B Bowman; Fiona E Harrison Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Julia Anglen Bauer; Roberta F White; Brent A Coull; Christine Austin; Manuela Oppini; Silvia Zoni; Chiara Fedrighi; Giuseppa Cagna; Donatella Placidi; Stefano Guazzetti; Qiong Yang; David C Bellinger; Thomas F Webster; Robert O Wright; Donald Smith; Megan Horton; Roberto G Lucchini; Manish Arora; Birgit Claus Henn Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 4.294