| Literature DB >> 28941218 |
Steven Van Cruchten1, Vanessa Vrolyk2, Marie-France Perron Lepage3, Marie Baudon3, Hélène Voute3, Sabine Schoofs4, Julius Haruna5, Marie-Odile Benoit-Biancamano2, Benoît Ruot3, Karel Allegaert6,7.
Abstract
In this review paper, literature data on pre- and postnatal eye development are compared between humans and nonclinical species that are commonly used for human safety assessment, namely, mouse, rat, rabbit, dog, minipig, and nonhuman primates. Some new data on rat and minipig ocular development are also included. This compiled information can be helpful for species selection in juvenile toxicity studies or assist in the interpretation of (non)clinical data during pediatric drug development. Despite some differences in developmental windows and anatomical peculiarities, such as the lack of a fovea centralis in nonprimate species or the presence of a nictitating membrane in some nonclinical species, the functioning and development of the eye is strikingly similar between humans and other mammals. As such, all commonly used nonclinical species appear to be relatively good models for human eye development, although some practical constraints such as size may be a limiting factor. Birth Defects Research 109:1540-1567, 2017.Entities:
Keywords: clinical; development; eye; function; morphology; nonclinical
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28941218 DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Birth Defects Res Impact factor: 2.344