Literature DB >> 28940962

Nasal high flow therapy and PtCO2 in stable COPD: A randomized controlled cross-over trial.

Steven McKinstry1,2,3, Janine Pilcher1,2,3, George Bardsley1,3, James Berry1, Susanne Van de Hei4, Irene Braithwaite1,3, James Fingleton1,2,3, Mark Weatherall3,5, Richard Beasley1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Hypercapnia is associated with worse clinical outcomes in exacerbations of COPD. The present study aimed to determine the effects of nasal high flow (NHF) therapy on transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PtCO2 ) in stable COPD patients.
METHODS: In a single-blind randomized controlled cross-over trial, 48 participants with COPD were allocated in random order to all of four 20 min interventions: NHF at 15 L/min, 30 L/min and 45 L/min or breathing room air with each intervention followed by a washout period of 15 min. The primary outcome measure was PtCO2 at 20 min, adjusted for baseline PtCO2 . Secondary outcomes included respiratory rate at 20 min, adjusted for baseline.
RESULTS: The mean (95% CI) change in PtCO2 at 20 min was -0.6 mm Hg (-1.1 to 0.0), P = 0.06; -1.3 mm Hg (-1.9 to 0.8), P < 0.001; and -2.4 mm Hg (-2.9 to -1.8), P < 0.001; for NHF at 15 L/min, 30 L/min and 45 L/min compared with room air, respectively. The mean (95% CI) change in respiratory rate at 20 min was -1.5 (-2.7 to -0.3), P = 0.02; -4.1 (-5.3 to -2.9), P < 0.001; and -4.3 (-5.5 to -3.1), P < 0.001; breaths per minute compared with room air, respectively.
CONCLUSION: NHF results in a small flow-dependent reduction in PtCO2 and respiratory rate in patients with stable COPD.
© 2017 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arterial partial pressure; carbon dioxide; chronic obstructive respiratory disease; nasal high flow; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28940962     DOI: 10.1111/resp.13185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respirology        ISSN: 1323-7799            Impact factor:   6.424


  8 in total

1.  Hospital Cost Savings for Sequential COPD Patients Receiving Domiciliary Nasal High Flow Therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Milne; Hans-Ulrich Hockey; Jeffrey Garrett
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Letter to the editor: "Nasal high-flow versus non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD" [Letter].

Authors:  J Elshof; M L Duiverman
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2019-09-06

3.  Effects of high-flow nasal cannula and non-invasive ventilation on inspiratory effort in hypercapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Nuttapol Rittayamai; Prapinpa Phuangchoei; Jamsak Tscheikuna; Nattakarn Praphruetkit; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 4.  High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yongkang Huang; Wei Lei; Wenyu Zhang; Jian-An Huang
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Predicting Adverse Events During Six-Minute Walk Test Using Continuous Physiological Signals.

Authors:  Jiachen Wang; Yaning Zang; Qian Wu; Yingjia She; Haoran Xu; Jian Zhang; Shan Cai; Yuzhu Li; Zhengbo Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Comparison of Conventional Oxygen Therapy With High-Flow Nasal Oxygenation in the Management of Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Jitendra Pratap Singh; Deepak Malviya; Samiksha Parashar; Soumya Sankar Nath; Archana Gautam; Neha Shrivastava
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-13

Review 7.  High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy as an emerging option for respiratory failure: the present and the future.

Authors:  Lucia Spicuzza; Matteo Schisano
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  The impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on exercise capacity in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Atsushi Suzuki; Masahiko Ando; Tomoki Kimura; Kensuke Kataoka; Toshiki Yokoyama; Eiichi Shiroshita; Yasuhiro Kondoh
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.317

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.