C Heijkenskjöld Rentzhog1, C Janson2, L Berglund3, M P Borres1, L Nordvall1, K Alving1, A Malinovschi4. 1. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 2. Department of Medical Sciences: Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 3. Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 4. Department of Medical Sciences: Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Classic spirometry is effort dependent and of limited value in assessing small airways. Peripheral airway involvement, and relation to poor control, in asthma, has been highlighted recently. Forced oscillation technique (FOT) offers an effort-independent assessment of overall and peripheral lung mechanics. We studied the association between lung function variables, obtained either by spirometry or multifrequency (5, 11 and 19 Hz) FOT, and asthma diagnosis and control. METHODS: Spirometry measures, resistance at 5 (R5) and 19 Hz (R19), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), resonant frequency (fres ), resistance difference between 5-19 Hz (R5-R19) and Asthma Control Test scores were determined in 234 asthmatic and 60 healthy subjects (aged 13-39 years). We used standardized lung function variables in logistic regression analyses, unadjusted and adjusted for age, height, gender and weight. RESULTS: Lower FEV1 /FVC (OR [95% CI] 0.47 [0.32, 0.69]) and FEF50 (0.62 [0.46, 0.85]) per standard deviation increase, and higher R5 (3.31 [1.95, 5.62]) and R19 (2.54 [1.65, 3.91]) were associated with asthma diagnosis. Independent predictive effects of FEV1 /FVC and R5 or R19, respectively, were found for asthma diagnosis. Lower FEV1 /FVC and altered peripheral FOT measures (X5, fres and R5-R19) were associated with uncontrolled asthma (P-values < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Resistance FOT measures were equally informative as spirometry, related to asthma diagnosis, and, furthermore, offered additive information to FEV1 /FVC, supporting a complementary role for FOT. Asthma control was related to FOT measures of peripheral airways, suggesting a potential use in identifying such involvement. Further studies are needed to determine a clinical value and relevant reference values in children, for the multifrequency FOT measurements.
BACKGROUND: Classic spirometry is effort dependent and of limited value in assessing small airways. Peripheral airway involvement, and relation to poor control, in asthma, has been highlighted recently. Forced oscillation technique (FOT) offers an effort-independent assessment of overall and peripheral lung mechanics. We studied the association between lung function variables, obtained either by spirometry or multifrequency (5, 11 and 19 Hz) FOT, and asthma diagnosis and control. METHODS: Spirometry measures, resistance at 5 (R5) and 19 Hz (R19), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), resonant frequency (fres ), resistance difference between 5-19 Hz (R5-R19) and Asthma Control Test scores were determined in 234 asthmatic and 60 healthy subjects (aged 13-39 years). We used standardized lung function variables in logistic regression analyses, unadjusted and adjusted for age, height, gender and weight. RESULTS: Lower FEV1 /FVC (OR [95% CI] 0.47 [0.32, 0.69]) and FEF50 (0.62 [0.46, 0.85]) per standard deviation increase, and higher R5 (3.31 [1.95, 5.62]) and R19 (2.54 [1.65, 3.91]) were associated with asthma diagnosis. Independent predictive effects of FEV1 /FVC and R5 or R19, respectively, were found for asthma diagnosis. Lower FEV1 /FVC and altered peripheral FOT measures (X5, fres and R5-R19) were associated with uncontrolled asthma (P-values < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Resistance FOT measures were equally informative as spirometry, related to asthma diagnosis, and, furthermore, offered additive information to FEV1 /FVC, supporting a complementary role for FOT. Asthma control was related to FOT measures of peripheral airways, suggesting a potential use in identifying such involvement. Further studies are needed to determine a clinical value and relevant reference values in children, for the multifrequency FOT measurements.
Authors: Marcello Cottini; Carlo Lombardi; Giovanni Passalacqua; Diego Bagnasco; Alvise Berti; Pasquale Comberiati; Gianluca Imeri; Massimo Landi; Enrico Heffler Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-05-23