Literature DB >> 28940708

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of zirconia-based implant fixed dental prostheses: Results of a prospective case series 5 years after implant placement.

Benedikt Christopher Spies1, Siegbert Witkowski1, Kirstin Vach2, Ralf-Joachim Kohal1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcome of all-ceramic zirconia implant supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) 5 years after implant installation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients were treated with two terminally placed one-piece zirconia implants for a three-unit FDP each. The FDPs consisted of a CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia framework over-pressed with a fluor-apatite veneering ceramic and were adhesively cemented. Survival and success were assessed by applying modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria and preparation of Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots. Alpha and Bravo ratings were accepted for success (among others including small area veneer chippings and occlusal roughness), whereas Charlie ratings allowing for intra-oral correction (e.g., polishing) were accepted for survival. Furthermore, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed with the help of visual analogue scales (VAS). Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test (USPHS criteria) and linear mixed models (PROMs) were used to evaluate time effects on response variables.
RESULTS: All patients were available 61.8 ± 1.1 months after implant installation (53.6 ± 3.1 months after final prosthesis insertion). FDP survival was 100%. Significant incidence of veneer chipping (p = .0096) and occlusal roughness (p = .0019) was observed. Charlie rated extent of both phenomena resulted in a KM success estimate of 38.5% (95% CI: 14.1%-62.8%; seven FDPs with obvious roughness, three of them with extended veneer chipping). Compared with the pre-treatment assessments (30%-81% of satisfaction), all surveys at prosthetic delivery showed significantly improved VAS scores (66%-93%; p ≤ .038), except for speech (p = .341). Concerning function, esthetics and self-esteem, no decrease in satisfaction could be observed until the end of follow-up (90%-96%; p ≥ .057), whereas perception of sense (92%) and speech (95%) increased over time (p ≤ .030). Occurrence of technical complications did not correlate with patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Bi-layered FDPs made from zirconia/fluor-apatite highly satisfied patients but showed significant incidence of technical complications.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD-CAM; case series; ceramics; dental implant; fixed dental prosthesis; zirconia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28940708     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Stability of Cantilever Fixed Dental Prostheses on Zirconia Implants.

Authors:  Nadja Rohr; Reto Nüesch; Rebecca Greune; Gino Mainetti; Sabrina Karlin; Lucia K Zaugg; Nicola U Zitzmann
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Experience with bruxism in the everyday oral implantology practice in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Magdalini Thymi; Annemiek Rollman; Corine M Visscher; Daniel Wismeijer; Frank Lobbezoo
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2018-11-09

Review 3.  Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Oral Implants In Vitro: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Annalena Bethke; Stefano Pieralli; Ralf-Joachim Kohal; Felix Burkhardt; Manja von Stein-Lausnitz; Kirstin Vach; Benedikt Christopher Spies
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Three-unit fixed dental prostheses supported by either two abutment implants or two abutment teeth: A comparative retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christiaan W P Pol; Gerry M Raghoebar; Marco S Cune; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 5.  Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Frank Akito Spitznagel; Marc Balmer; Daniel B Wiedemeier; Ronald Ernst Jung; Petra Christine Gierthmuehlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.021

Review 6.  Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Se-Wook Pyo; Dae-Joon Kim; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Luke Yeo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Full-zirconia single-tooth molar implant-supported restorations with angulated screw channel abutments: A 1-year prospective case series study.

Authors:  Christiaan W P Pol; Gerry M Raghoebar; Zakelina Maragkou; Marco S Cune; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.932

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.