Literature DB >> 28940603

Long-term stable vertical bone regeneration after sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implant placement with and without grafting.

Fernando Verdugo1, Agurne Uribarri2, Theresia Laksmana3, Antonio D'addona4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Less invasive surgical approaches to regenerate bone intra-sinus and allow long-term functional implant stability are needed.
PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term vertical bone regeneration after sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implant placement with and without bone grafting.
METHODS: Vertical bone gains (VBG) post-sinus elevation, with and without grafting, were evaluated in thirty individuals presenting an average residual bone height (RBH) of 4.2 mm using a standardized digital technique. Measurements were taken preoperatively, and at an average of 64.6 months follow-up. Clinically, peri-implant tissues were assessed for pocket formation and presence of inflammation to evaluate established success criteria.
RESULTS: Overall, RBH averaged 4.2 ± 1.1 mm (range: 1.8-5.8) and VBG 7.7 ± 1.6 mm (range: 6.0-12.9). Mean difference of 7.6 mm between vertical bone heights (VBH) at augmented implants sites and initial RBH, 11.8 versus 4.2 mm, (P < .0001, CI95%: 6.9-8.2) was statistically significant. RBH averaged 4.5 ± 0.8 mm and 3.8 ± 1.2 (P = .07) and VBG 6.8 ± 0.5 and 8.5 ± 1.9 mm (P = .003, CI95%: 0.6-2.7), for nongrafted and grafted individuals, respectively. The grafting group received an average graft volume of 0.35 ± 0.1 cc (range: 0.25-0.5) per implant site. Long-term follow-ups average 64.6 months (range: 36-144) and all implants met the success criteria. VBG ≥ 7 mm were 7.3 times more likely to develop on grafted sites (OR = 7.3, P = 0.02, CI95%: 1.2-46.2).
CONCLUSION: None to negligible amounts of grafting material are required to regenerate substantial amounts of autogenous bone into atrophic sinus cavities after simultaneous implant placement. The regenerated VBH seems stable for functional implant stability long-term. Implant success rates were 100% at an average of 64.6 months.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone grafting; bone transplantation; dental implant; maxillary sinus floor augmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28940603     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  4 in total

1.  Transalveolar sinus floor lift without bone grafting in atrophic maxilla: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingdong Yan; Ruimin Liu; Shuting Bai; Min Wang; Haibin Xia; Jiang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Sinus Floor Elevation via an Osteotome Technique without Biomaterials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Andrés-García; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Pedro Bullón; Javier Fernández-Farhall; Alberto Gómez-Menchero; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Grafted bone remodeling following transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Pe-Yi Kuo; Cho-Ying Lin; Chi-Ching Chang; Yuan-Min Wang; Whei-Lin Pan
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.910

4.  Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Mikio Imai; Yoichiro Ogino; Hideaki Tanaka; Kiyoshi Koyano; Yasunori Ayukawa; Takeshi Toyoshima
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.747

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.