Literature DB >> 28940223

A descriptive study on the efficacy and complications of the Capio (Boston Scientific) suturing device for sacrospinous ligament fixation.

Alex Mowat1, Vivien Wong2, Judith Goh3, Hannah Krause3, Anita Pelecanos4, Peta Higgs5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacrospinous colpopexy is an effective vaginal apical support operation. Due to morbidity associated with traditional approaches which require wide dissection, slim-line suture delivery devices have been introduced in the hope of reducing morbidity without compromise to outcomes. AIM: The aim of our series was to report outcomes and complications (particularly buttock pain and blood loss) of the sacrospinous colpopexy using the Capio suturing device and evaluate it against published results using the Miya hook.
METHODS: This is a prospective, multi-centre descriptive study. The primary outcome is objective success at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include subjective success at 12 months, patient-reported outcomes at 12 months, operating time, estimated blood loss and post-operative buttock pain.
RESULTS: Fifty-one consenting patients undergoing sacrospinous colpopexy were recruited at four Queensland hospitals. Objective success at 12 months was 95% (41/43) and subjective success at 12 months was 92% (44/48). Eighty-four percent of patients reported buttock pain at one week, reducing to 16% by six weeks, of which 7% required analgesia.
CONCLUSIONS: At a mean of 17 months follow up, we found that the sacrospinous colpopexy using the Capio suturing device provided excellent apical support with a low requirement for blood transfusion and an average operating time of seven minutes. We found a high rate of buttock pain immediately post-operatively, but our rates became consistent with previous reports by six weeks post-operation.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pain; postoperative; vaginal vault prolapse

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28940223     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  7 in total

1.  Trends in prolapse surgery in England.

Authors:  Martino Maria Zacche; Sambit Mukhopadhyay; Ilias Giarenis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The resurrection of sacrospinous fixation: unilateral apical sling hysteropexy.

Authors:  Dmitry Shkarupa; Nikita Kubin; Ekaterina Shapovalova; Anastasya Zaytseva
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  How we do an anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Estelle Declas; Geraldine Giraudet; Celine De Graer; Cyril Bengler; Sophie Delplanque; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Comparison of Postoperative Short-Term Outcomes between Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Surgery Using the Capio™ SLIM Suture Capturing Device and Conventional TVM Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Haruhiko Kanasaki; Aki Oride; Tomomi Hara; Satoru Kyo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-04-01

6.  Fast track sacrospinous ligament fixation: subjective and objective outcomes at 6 months.

Authors:  Susanne Greisen; Susanne Maigaard Axelsen; Karl Møller Bek; Rikke Guldberg; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Surgical management of pudendal nerve entrapment after sacrospinous ligament fixation.

Authors:  Eva V Vodegel; Kim W M van Delft; Charlotte H C Nuboer; Claudia R Kowalik; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 7.331

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.